All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:38:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422213857.GM18672@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534EC282.7010905@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:48:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> XFS_ERROR was designed long ago to trap return values,
> but it's not runtime configurable, it's not consistently used,
> and we can do the same thing today with systemtap, using
> something like:
> 
> probe module("xfs").function("xfs_*").return { if (@defined($return) && $return == VALUE) { ... } }
> 
> Just nuke XFS_ERROR and associated bits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

Eric, given the rebasing impact of this change on other pending
work, I think we should plan to merge this just prior to the next
upstream merge. Perhaps regenerate it against the for-next branch
a week before the merge window is likely to open, and then apply
it? That way we (well, I) don't have to spend a alrge proportion of
this merge window fixing up patch mismatches vs the master branch?

Is that an acceptible approach for everyone?

(Note: I'm assuming Christoph is OK with this given the ftrace
scripts we can use to replace this macro...)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16 17:40 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: clean up return handling Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: return is not a function Eric Sandeen
2014-04-21  6:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 17:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 17:55     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 19:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 22:08         ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 23:44           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-17  0:39             ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-17  0:49               ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-21  6:57               ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:43                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 22:28     ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22 21:38   ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140422213857.GM18672@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.