From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
To: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] xfs: clean up return handling
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 12:40:03 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <534EC073.8090006@sandeen.net> (raw)
2 patches here:
First of all, "return" is not a function. "return(EIO);" is silly.
"return (EIO);" is even sillier. Stop it.
Second of all, XFS_ERROR was designed long ago to trap return values,
but it's not runtime configurable, it's not consistently used,
and we can do the same thing today with systemtap.
So nuke that macro, too.
This is a *lot* of churn. It'll make merging across this change hard.
So we might want to batch this up with another suggestion of Dave's,
to migrate all of xfs to the Linux convention of negative error
returns everywhere, so we don't have two nasty points to merge
across - that'd be fine with me. But anyway, here it is for now.
For posterity, the first patch was generated with:
perl -p -i -e 's/return \(([a-zA-Z0-9]*?)\)/return $1/g' *.c
perl -p -i -e 's/return\(([a-zA-Z0-9]*?)\)/return $1/g' *.c
and the 2nd with:
perl -p -i -e 's/return\(XFS_ERROR\(([a-zA-Z0-9]*?)\)\)/return XFS_ERROR($1)/g' *.c
perl -p -i -e 's/return \(XFS_ERROR\(([a-zA-Z0-9]*?)\)\)/return XFS_ERROR($1)/g' *.c
(Yes, I know I could have done it w/ one regexp - so sue me) ;)
-Eric
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next reply other threads:[~2014-04-16 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-16 17:40 Eric Sandeen [this message]
2014-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: return is not a function Eric Sandeen
2014-04-21 6:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 17:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 17:55 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 19:11 ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 22:08 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 23:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-17 0:39 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-17 0:49 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-21 6:57 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:43 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 22:28 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22 21:38 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=534EC073.8090006@sandeen.net \
--to=sandeen@sandeen.net \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.