From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: sh_mobile: add devicetree documentation
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 09:23:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140502072303.GB2647@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKgwKjag2hRSaDwoejuXRDxDgWwtpnS1gijQbVo0h_MjQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:02:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> >
> > CC devicetree
Yes. Thanks, Geert.
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible : "renesas,iic-<soctype>". "renesas,rmobile-iic" as fallback
> >
> > Please also list all supported values, so checkpatch can validate DTS compatible
> > properties against this binding document.
>
> You could add this pattern to checkpatch as well. I really wish
> Renesas would follow normal convention of <vendor>,<chip>-<device>.
The binding is already applied and this patch just adds forgotten
documentation. Can we keep this documentation describing the current
state for now and discuss the binding convention seperately?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
"devicetree@vger.kernel.org" <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] i2c: sh_mobile: add devicetree documentation
Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 07:23:03 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140502072303.GB2647@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_JsqKgwKjag2hRSaDwoejuXRDxDgWwtpnS1gijQbVo0h_MjQ@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 813 bytes --]
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 08:02:10PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 5:32 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
> <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > Hi Wolfram,
> >
> > CC devicetree
Yes. Thanks, Geert.
> >> +Required properties:
> >> +- compatible : "renesas,iic-<soctype>". "renesas,rmobile-iic" as fallback
> >
> > Please also list all supported values, so checkpatch can validate DTS compatible
> > properties against this binding document.
>
> You could add this pattern to checkpatch as well. I really wish
> Renesas would follow normal convention of <vendor>,<chip>-<device>.
The binding is already applied and this patch just adds forgotten
documentation. Can we keep this documentation describing the current
state for now and discuss the binding convention seperately?
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-02 7:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-30 22:21 [PATCH 0/6] i2c: sh_mobile: cleanups Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 1/6] i2c: sh_mobile: replace magic hex values with constants Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 2/6] i2c: sh_mobile: improve error handling Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1398896470-24663-3-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 22:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-30 22:25 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-02 7:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-05-02 7:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 3/6] i2c: sh_mobile: honor DT bus speed settings Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 5/6] i2c: sh_mobile: devm conversion, low hanging fruits Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-30 22:39 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
[not found] ` <1398896470-24663-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 4/6] i2c: sh_mobile: add devicetree documentation Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-30 22:32 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-05-01 1:02 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-01 1:02 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-02 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-05-02 7:23 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` [PATCH 6/6] i2c: sh_mobile: devm conversion, irq setup Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-04-30 22:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-04-30 22:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140502072303.GB2647@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.