From: thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 4/4] ARM: mvebu: implement L2/PCIe deadlock workaround
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 14:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140513145205.1dad280f@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11503675.BOHdnE4xD3@wuerfel>
Dear Arnd Bergmann,
On Tue, 13 May 2014 13:13:39 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hmm, I think this needs some more explanation about which flags
> you are actually interested in.
>
> These are the three common mem types for ioremap:
>
> #define PROT_PTE_DEVICE L_PTE_PRESENT|L_PTE_YOUNG|L_PTE_DIRTY|L_PTE_XN
> #define PROT_SECT_DEVICE PMD_TYPE_SECT|PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE
>
> [MT_DEVICE] = { /* Strongly ordered / ARMv6 shared device */
> .prot_pte = PROT_PTE_DEVICE | L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED |
> L_PTE_SHARED,
> .prot_pte_s2 = s2_policy(PROT_PTE_S2_DEVICE) |
> s2_policy(L_PTE_S2_MT_DEV_SHARED) |
> L_PTE_SHARED,
> .prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE | PMD_SECT_S,
> .domain = DOMAIN_IO,
> },
> [MT_DEVICE_CACHED] = { /* ioremap_cached */
> .prot_pte = PROT_PTE_DEVICE | L_PTE_MT_DEV_CACHED,
> .prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE | PMD_SECT_WB,
> .domain = DOMAIN_IO,
> },
> [MT_DEVICE_WC] = { /* ioremap_wc */
> .prot_pte = PROT_PTE_DEVICE | L_PTE_MT_DEV_WC,
> .prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE,
> .domain = DOMAIN_IO,
> },
>
> and this is the one you enforce here:
>
> [MT_MEMORY_RW_SO] = {
> .prot_pte = L_PTE_PRESENT | L_PTE_YOUNG | L_PTE_DIRTY |
> L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED | L_PTE_XN,
> .prot_l1 = PMD_TYPE_TABLE,
> .prot_sect = PMD_TYPE_SECT | PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | PMD_SECT_S |
> PMD_SECT_UNCACHED | PMD_SECT_XN,
> .domain = DOMAIN_KERNEL,
> },
>
> So you set a different domain, and turn write-combined and cached mappings
> into uncached mappings, and for uncached mappings you remove the "shared"
> flag. Which of these changes is the one you actually need?
I *believe* the important part is the change from L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED
to L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED, because:
#define L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x00) << 2)
#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x04) << 2)
So the former is "Strongly-Ordered" according to the ARM ARM, while the
latter is "Device Shareable".
The only detail I have access to is that the workaround is "Reads
targeting PCIe End Point must be marked Strongly Ordered", so it's
pretty limited in details.
Do you think I should create a different memory type MT_DEVICE_SO, that
remains in the DOMAIN_IO domain, but uses L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED instead of
L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd-r2nGTMty4D4@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Russell King <linux-lFZ/pmaqli7XmaaqVzeoHQ@public.gmane.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Grant Likely
<grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt-DgEjT+Ai2ygdnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
Albin Tonnerre <albin.tonnerre-5wv7dgnIgG8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Jason Cooper <jason-NLaQJdtUoK4Be96aLqz0jA@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew-g2DYL2Zd6BY@public.gmane.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth
<sebastian.hesselbarth-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
Gregory Clement
<gregory.clement-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Nadav Haklai <nadavh-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Lior Amsalem <alior-eYqpPyKDWXRBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 4/4] ARM: mvebu: implement L2/PCIe deadlock workaround
Date: Tue, 13 May 2014 14:52:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140513145205.1dad280f@free-electrons.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <11503675.BOHdnE4xD3@wuerfel>
Dear Arnd Bergmann,
On Tue, 13 May 2014 13:13:39 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hmm, I think this needs some more explanation about which flags
> you are actually interested in.
>
> These are the three common mem types for ioremap:
>
> #define PROT_PTE_DEVICE L_PTE_PRESENT|L_PTE_YOUNG|L_PTE_DIRTY|L_PTE_XN
> #define PROT_SECT_DEVICE PMD_TYPE_SECT|PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE
>
> [MT_DEVICE] = { /* Strongly ordered / ARMv6 shared device */
> .prot_pte = PROT_PTE_DEVICE | L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED |
> L_PTE_SHARED,
> .prot_pte_s2 = s2_policy(PROT_PTE_S2_DEVICE) |
> s2_policy(L_PTE_S2_MT_DEV_SHARED) |
> L_PTE_SHARED,
> .prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE | PMD_SECT_S,
> .domain = DOMAIN_IO,
> },
> [MT_DEVICE_CACHED] = { /* ioremap_cached */
> .prot_pte = PROT_PTE_DEVICE | L_PTE_MT_DEV_CACHED,
> .prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE | PMD_SECT_WB,
> .domain = DOMAIN_IO,
> },
> [MT_DEVICE_WC] = { /* ioremap_wc */
> .prot_pte = PROT_PTE_DEVICE | L_PTE_MT_DEV_WC,
> .prot_sect = PROT_SECT_DEVICE,
> .domain = DOMAIN_IO,
> },
>
> and this is the one you enforce here:
>
> [MT_MEMORY_RW_SO] = {
> .prot_pte = L_PTE_PRESENT | L_PTE_YOUNG | L_PTE_DIRTY |
> L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED | L_PTE_XN,
> .prot_l1 = PMD_TYPE_TABLE,
> .prot_sect = PMD_TYPE_SECT | PMD_SECT_AP_WRITE | PMD_SECT_S |
> PMD_SECT_UNCACHED | PMD_SECT_XN,
> .domain = DOMAIN_KERNEL,
> },
>
> So you set a different domain, and turn write-combined and cached mappings
> into uncached mappings, and for uncached mappings you remove the "shared"
> flag. Which of these changes is the one you actually need?
I *believe* the important part is the change from L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED
to L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED, because:
#define L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x00) << 2)
#define L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED (_AT(pteval_t, 0x04) << 2)
So the former is "Strongly-Ordered" according to the ARM ARM, while the
latter is "Device Shareable".
The only detail I have access to is that the workaround is "Reads
targeting PCIe End Point must be marked Strongly Ordered", so it's
pretty limited in details.
Do you think I should create a different memory type MT_DEVICE_SO, that
remains in the DOMAIN_IO domain, but uses L_PTE_MT_UNCACHED instead of
L_PTE_MT_DEV_SHARED ?
Thanks,
Thomas
--
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-13 12:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-13 10:10 [PATCHv2 0/4] ARM: implement workaround for Cortex-A9/PL310/PCIe deadlock Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` [PATCHv2 1/4] of: make of_update_property() usable earlier in the boot process Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 14:00 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-13 14:00 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-13 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 14:30 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 14:54 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-13 14:54 ` Grant Likely
2014-05-13 15:30 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-13 15:30 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-13 15:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 15:54 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 16:31 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-13 16:31 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-13 16:58 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-13 16:58 ` Rob Herring
2014-05-13 17:00 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-13 17:00 ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-13 10:10 ` [PATCHv2 2/4] ARM: mm: allow sub-architectures to override PCI I/O memory type Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-14 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 15:01 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-13 10:10 ` [PATCHv2 3/4] ARM: mm: add support for HW coherent systems in PL310 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-14 14:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 14:34 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 14:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-14 14:58 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` [PATCHv2 4/4] ARM: mvebu: implement L2/PCIe deadlock workaround Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 10:10 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-13 11:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-13 11:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-13 12:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni [this message]
2014-05-13 12:52 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-14 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 15:24 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 14:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 14:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-14 15:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-14 15:04 ` Thomas Petazzoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140513145205.1dad280f@free-electrons.com \
--to=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.