[PATCHv2 1/4] of: make of_update_property() usable earlier in the boot process

[thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com (Thomas Petazzoni)]

Dear Jason Cooper,

On Tue, 13 May 2014 11:30:06 -0400, Jason Cooper wrote:

> > Well, I guess it's a per-maintainer choice:
> > 
> > git log | grep "^Fixes:"
> > 
> >     Fixes: 54fe26a900bc528f3df1e4235cb6b9ca5c6d4dc2 ('ARM: mvebu: Add thermal quirk for the Armada 375 DB board')
> 
> Well, just because the maintainer is an idiot and didn't catch it isn't
> an excuse to continue the behavior. ;-)

Yes, no problem :)

> >     Fixes: 54397d85349f ("ARM: kirkwood: Relocate PCIe device tree nodes")
> >     Fixes: a7d4f81821f7 ('ARM: mvebu: Add support for NOR flash device on Openblocks AX3 board')
> >     Fixes: b484ff42df47 ('ARM: mvebu: Add support for NOR flash device on Armada XP-DB board')
> >     Fixes: c971ff185f64 ("leds: leds-pwm: Defer led_pwm_set() if PWM can sleep")
> >     Fixes: abccd00f8af2 ('btrfs: Fix 32/64-bit problem with BTRFS_SET_RECEIVED_SUBVOL ioctl')
> >     Fixes: ee1e0994ab1bd (regulator: s5m8767: Use GPIO for controlling Buck9/eMMC)
> >     Fixes: 652ed95d5fa6 (cpufreq: introduce cpufreq_generic_get() routine)
> > 
> > Somewhat inconsistent :-)
> 
> Yeah, I can go either way on the single quotes/double quotes.  The
> 12-character hash definitely increases readability, though.

I must say I never understood the logic here. We used to use 8 digit
hashes, and then we had collisions. So it means that if we look at the
Git history now, some of these 8 digit hashes no longer uniquely
identify a commit.

To fix this up, we moved to use 12 digit hashes. But that's just
pushing the problem a bit further away, no? There will be some
collision at some point, and therefore in the future 652ed95d5fa6 may
no longer be a unique identifier for the "cpufreq: introduce
cpufreq_generic_get() routine" commit, and therefore people reading the
Git history 3 or 5 years from now will see non-unique identifiers in
'Fixes:' fields.

To me, it would make a lot more sense to use full hashes. I don't
really see how it decreases readability, and it's the most future proof
solution we have (knowing that of course, collisions are still
theoretically possible).

Thomas
-- 
Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com