From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:55:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523215544.GI13642@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de>
On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> > option).
>
> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
>
I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
implementation and board files.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
arm@kernel.org, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:55:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140523215544.GI13642@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de>
On 23/05/2014 at 23:27:51 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> > SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> > but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> > option).
>
> Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!
>
I'm on it ;) I actually have two more almost ready but I will submit the
remaining four for 3.17. I don't think this is urgent enough to rush it
and I'd like to test it enough before we start removing the old clock
implementation and board files.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-23 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-22 16:24 [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3 Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-22 16:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-23 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 21:55 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2014-05-23 21:55 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-23 22:01 ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-23 22:01 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140523215544.GI13642@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.