All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:27:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400775895-31183-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> option).

Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!

> This pull-request depends on:
> - the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
>   3.15-rc6 tag.
> - the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
> So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
> before adding the material for this pull-request.
> 
> About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
> while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
> nodes as they had been written by Boris.
> As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
> when Mark gives his point of view.

Ok. I've merged it into next/dt now.

	Arnd

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
	arm@kernel.org, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
	Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	"Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3
Date: Fri, 23 May 2014 23:27:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1400775895-31183-1-git-send-email-nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>

On Thursday 22 May 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Another AT91 DT pull-request for 3.16. This one is the conversion of two more
> SoC to Common Clock Framework (aka CCF). I identified it as a "DT" pull-request
> but it modifies slightly a couple of files in mach-at91 (use of a configuration
> option).

Four done, four more to go? Nice progress!

> This pull-request depends on:
> - the fixes that I already sent for 3.15 and that are present in the recent
>   3.15-rc6 tag.
> - the at91-cleanup tag that you integrated in your arm-soc/next/soc branch.
> So, as suggested by Arnd on IRC, I merged both of them to act as the base
> before adding the material for this pull-request.
> 
> About the clock nodes that should be grouped in a "clocks" container or not,
> while waiting for a clear statement by the DT maintainers, I kept the clocks
> nodes as they had been written by Boris.
> As proposed by Olof, I plan to send you a comprehensive patch that fixes this
> when Mark gives his point of view.

Ok. I've merged it into next/dt now.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-23 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-22 16:24 [GIT PULL] at91: DT for 3.16 at91-dt3 #3 Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-22 16:24 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-05-23 21:27 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-05-23 21:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-23 21:55   ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-23 21:55     ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-05-23 22:01     ` Olof Johansson
2014-05-23 22:01       ` Olof Johansson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201405232327.52312.arnd@arndb.de \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.