From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>,
kernel@stlinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Gupta, Pekon\"" <pekon@ti.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:58:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708095855.29c2fb87@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707235222.GC7537@ld-irv-0074>
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:52:22 -0700
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:22AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:22:37 -0700 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + nand_timing0: nand-timing {
> > > > + sig-setup = <10>;
> > > > + sig-hold = <10>;
> > > > + CE-deassert = <0>;
> > > > + WE-to-RBn = <100>;
> > > > + wr-on = <10>;
> > > > + wr-off = <30>;
> > > > + rd-on = <10>;
> > > > + rd-off = <30>;
> > > > + chip-delay = <30>; /* delay in us */
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > You didn't document any of this node. And I don't think we want to
> > > specify every single timing parameter in DT; it may make sense to use
> > > Boris Brezillon's approach (I note this further down, in the driver
> > > code) for mapping non-ONFI NAND timings into a compatible ONFI timing
> > > mode. This will greatly simplify the bindings needed, since it's
> > > standardized and auto-detectable in many cases.
> >
> >
> > AFAIR, the NAND timing representation for non-ONFI chips question was
> > left unanswered:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/20/581
> >
> > I can definitely respin my NAND timings series, but I'd like to be sure
> > this is how you want it done before doing so.
>
> Can we start by supporting ONFI-only (or ONFI-only, plus entries in
> nand_flash_ids[]), and have nand_base provide the translation so drivers
> can retrieve the info? Then we can begin supporting new drivers like
> Lee's, and worry about the DT question separately.
So, basically, I just send a new series with patch 1 and 2 from my sunxi
NAND series [1] (including the fixes you suggested, of course), right ?
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi/7977
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>,
devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Boris BREZILLON
<b.brezillon.dev-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org>,
kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mtd-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
"Gupta, Pekon\"" <pekon-l0cyMroinI0@public.gmane.org>,
Ezequiel Garcia
<ezequiel.garcia-wi1+55ScJUtKEb57/3fJTNBPR1lH4CV8@public.gmane.org>,
linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org,
Jason Gunthorpe
<jgunthorpe-ePGOBjL8dl3ta4EC/59zMFaTQe2KTcn/@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:58:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708095855.29c2fb87@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707235222.GC7537@ld-irv-0074>
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:52:22 -0700
Brian Norris <computersforpeace-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:22AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:22:37 -0700 Brian Norris <computersforpeace-Re5JQEeQqe8AvxtiuMwx3w@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + nand_timing0: nand-timing {
> > > > + sig-setup = <10>;
> > > > + sig-hold = <10>;
> > > > + CE-deassert = <0>;
> > > > + WE-to-RBn = <100>;
> > > > + wr-on = <10>;
> > > > + wr-off = <30>;
> > > > + rd-on = <10>;
> > > > + rd-off = <30>;
> > > > + chip-delay = <30>; /* delay in us */
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > You didn't document any of this node. And I don't think we want to
> > > specify every single timing parameter in DT; it may make sense to use
> > > Boris Brezillon's approach (I note this further down, in the driver
> > > code) for mapping non-ONFI NAND timings into a compatible ONFI timing
> > > mode. This will greatly simplify the bindings needed, since it's
> > > standardized and auto-detectable in many cases.
> >
> >
> > AFAIR, the NAND timing representation for non-ONFI chips question was
> > left unanswered:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/20/581
> >
> > I can definitely respin my NAND timings series, but I'd like to be sure
> > this is how you want it done before doing so.
>
> Can we start by supporting ONFI-only (or ONFI-only, plus entries in
> nand_flash_ids[]), and have nand_base provide the translation so drivers
> can retrieve the info? Then we can begin supporting new drivers like
> Lee's, and worry about the DT question separately.
So, basically, I just send a new series with patch 1 and 2 from my sunxi
NAND series [1] (including the fixes you suggested, of course), right ?
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi/7977
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>
To: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
Boris BREZILLON <b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com>,
kernel@stlinux.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, "Gupta, Pekon\"" <pekon@ti.com>,
Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2014 09:58:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140708095855.29c2fb87@bbrezillon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140707235222.GC7537@ld-irv-0074>
Hi Brian,
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014 16:52:22 -0700
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Boris,
>
> On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 10:05:22AM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> > On Wed, 2 Jul 2014 17:22:37 -0700 Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:20:05AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + nand_timing0: nand-timing {
> > > > + sig-setup = <10>;
> > > > + sig-hold = <10>;
> > > > + CE-deassert = <0>;
> > > > + WE-to-RBn = <100>;
> > > > + wr-on = <10>;
> > > > + wr-off = <30>;
> > > > + rd-on = <10>;
> > > > + rd-off = <30>;
> > > > + chip-delay = <30>; /* delay in us */
> > > > + };
> > >
> > > You didn't document any of this node. And I don't think we want to
> > > specify every single timing parameter in DT; it may make sense to use
> > > Boris Brezillon's approach (I note this further down, in the driver
> > > code) for mapping non-ONFI NAND timings into a compatible ONFI timing
> > > mode. This will greatly simplify the bindings needed, since it's
> > > standardized and auto-detectable in many cases.
> >
> >
> > AFAIR, the NAND timing representation for non-ONFI chips question was
> > left unanswered:
> >
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/5/20/581
> >
> > I can definitely respin my NAND timings series, but I'd like to be sure
> > this is how you want it done before doing so.
>
> Can we start by supporting ONFI-only (or ONFI-only, plus entries in
> nand_flash_ids[]), and have nand_base provide the translation so drivers
> can retrieve the info? Then we can begin supporting new drivers like
> Lee's, and worry about the DT question separately.
So, basically, I just send a new series with patch 1 and 2 from my sunxi
NAND series [1] (including the fixes you suggested, of course), right ?
[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.hardware.netbook.arm.sunxi/7977
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-08 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-28 9:20 [PATCH] mtd: nand: stm_nand_bch: add new driver Lee Jones
2014-05-28 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-05-28 9:20 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-03 0:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03 0:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03 0:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03 8:05 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-03 8:05 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-03 8:05 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-07 23:52 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-07 23:52 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-07 23:52 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-07 23:52 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08 7:58 ` Boris BREZILLON [this message]
2014-07-08 7:58 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-08 7:58 ` Boris BREZILLON
2014-07-09 17:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-09 17:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-09 17:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-09 17:22 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03 9:09 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-03 9:09 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-03 9:09 ` Gupta, Pekon
2014-07-08 0:16 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08 0:16 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-08 0:16 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-05 14:23 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 14:23 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 14:23 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 14:23 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-05 21:02 ` pekon
2014-08-05 21:02 ` pekon
2014-08-05 21:02 ` pekon at pek-sem.com
2014-08-19 2:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19 2:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19 2:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19 2:12 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-20 18:02 ` pekon
2014-08-20 18:02 ` pekon
2014-08-20 18:02 ` pekon
2014-07-31 16:47 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-31 16:47 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-31 16:47 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-31 17:54 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-31 17:54 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-31 17:54 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-31 17:54 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-01 9:27 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-01 9:27 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-01 9:27 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-19 2:42 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19 2:42 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19 2:42 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-19 2:42 ` Brian Norris
2014-08-06 10:44 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:44 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:44 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:26 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:26 ` Lee Jones
2014-08-06 10:26 ` Lee Jones
2014-07-03 0:50 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03 0:50 ` Brian Norris
2014-07-03 0:50 ` Brian Norris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140708095855.29c2fb87@bbrezillon \
--to=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=b.brezillon.dev@gmail.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ezequiel.garcia@free-electrons.com \
--cc=jgunthorpe@obsidianresearch.com \
--cc=kernel@stlinux.com \
--cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=pekon@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.