From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [GIT PULL] at91: drivers for 3.18 #2
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140908092642.GB20883@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201409052325.11709.arnd@arndb.de>
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
> >
> > This pull-request is focused on the work that Maxime did for migrating our timer
> > (PIT) to the clocksource sub-system. A big cleanup happened which allows us to
> > be even closer to the point when we have only the bare minimum in our formerly
> > crowded mach-at91 directory.
> >
> > This pull-request goes on top of the "drivers" one already sent to you on Sept.
> > 01st.
>
> Hmm, I'm not too happy to see more uses of early_platform_*, I was hoping
> we could kill that off in the long run. This is only used for the legacy
> board files, not for DT, right?
Yes, the DT uses the usual CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE mechanism.
I wasn't aware that early_platform drivers were in the killzone, but
I'm definitely aware that global custom exported functions are, hence
why I went this way.
> Do you have a timeline for getting rid of the board files completely?
I don't, but it would be great if we could kill these in the next
couple releases.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20140908/5a2806c9/attachment.sig>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
arm@kernel.org, Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] at91: drivers for 3.18 #2
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2014 11:26:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140908092642.GB20883@lukather> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201409052325.11709.arnd@arndb.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1255 bytes --]
Hi Arnd,
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 11:25:11PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 05 September 2014, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> > Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
> >
> > This pull-request is focused on the work that Maxime did for migrating our timer
> > (PIT) to the clocksource sub-system. A big cleanup happened which allows us to
> > be even closer to the point when we have only the bare minimum in our formerly
> > crowded mach-at91 directory.
> >
> > This pull-request goes on top of the "drivers" one already sent to you on Sept.
> > 01st.
>
> Hmm, I'm not too happy to see more uses of early_platform_*, I was hoping
> we could kill that off in the long run. This is only used for the legacy
> board files, not for DT, right?
Yes, the DT uses the usual CLOCKSOURCE_OF_DECLARE mechanism.
I wasn't aware that early_platform drivers were in the killzone, but
I'm definitely aware that global custom exported functions are, hence
why I went this way.
> Do you have a timeline for getting rid of the board files completely?
I don't, but it would be great if we could kill these in the next
couple releases.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-08 9:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-05 16:36 [GIT PULL] at91: drivers for 3.18 #2 Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-05 16:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-05 21:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-05 21:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-05 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-05 21:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-08 9:26 ` Maxime Ripard [this message]
2014-09-08 9:26 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-08 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-08 9:52 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 9:15 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-09 9:15 ` Maxime Ripard
2014-09-09 9:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-09 9:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-15 16:12 ` [GIT PULL] at91: drivers for 3.18 #2 (bis) Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-15 16:12 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-24 4:59 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-24 4:59 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-24 10:50 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-24 10:50 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-09-24 17:34 ` Olof Johansson
2014-09-24 17:34 ` Olof Johansson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140908092642.GB20883@lukather \
--to=maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.