From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, timur@tabi.org,
Li.Xiubo@freescale.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:24:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917022440.GA3216@Asurada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917013251.GA4796@dragon>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:19:28AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:46:34PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > The spdif root clock may be used by other module or defined with
> > > CLK_SET_RATE_GATE, so we can't change the clock rate in driver.
> > > In this patch remove the clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate to protect the
> > > clock.
> >
> > It's a quite convenient and conservative way to remove the clock
> > dealing code in the driver, however, it may result less flexible
> > functionalities.
> >
> > The reason why I left the clk_set_rate() in the driver is to hope
> > we may find a better way to tackle those tough situations. For IP
> > itself, it doesn't matter if the clock the SoC provides to it is
> > being shared by other modules or not.
> >
> > So I think, if it's a shared clock, we should not define it as a
> > rate-changeable one in the SoC level, as we might still have some
> > SoCs provide a dedicated clock to S/PDIF so as to get the maximum
> > range of clock support for users.
> >
> > @Shawn
> > Sorry to involve you in this topic. I'm not so sure if we can do
> > this in the clock driver so that the clock rate would be fixed
> > even if the driver is trying to change it. If we can, I think we
> > may use a better solution here instead.
>
> No, we do not have anything like that today.
It's not supported in the clock API or just not implemented in our
code? Can we just register a clock without CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT to
achieve the purpose? (We are just trying to fix those PRED and PODF
dividers when the driver calls set_rate to their GATE clock.)
Thank you
Nicolin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, timur@tabi.org,
perex@perex.cz, Li.Xiubo@freescale.com,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:24:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917022440.GA3216@Asurada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917013251.GA4796@dragon>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:19:28AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:46:34PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > The spdif root clock may be used by other module or defined with
> > > CLK_SET_RATE_GATE, so we can't change the clock rate in driver.
> > > In this patch remove the clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate to protect the
> > > clock.
> >
> > It's a quite convenient and conservative way to remove the clock
> > dealing code in the driver, however, it may result less flexible
> > functionalities.
> >
> > The reason why I left the clk_set_rate() in the driver is to hope
> > we may find a better way to tackle those tough situations. For IP
> > itself, it doesn't matter if the clock the SoC provides to it is
> > being shared by other modules or not.
> >
> > So I think, if it's a shared clock, we should not define it as a
> > rate-changeable one in the SoC level, as we might still have some
> > SoCs provide a dedicated clock to S/PDIF so as to get the maximum
> > range of clock support for users.
> >
> > @Shawn
> > Sorry to involve you in this topic. I'm not so sure if we can do
> > this in the clock driver so that the clock rate would be fixed
> > even if the driver is trying to change it. If we can, I think we
> > may use a better solution here instead.
>
> No, we do not have anything like that today.
It's not supported in the clock API or just not implemented in our
code? Can we just register a clock without CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT to
achieve the purpose? (We are just trying to fix those PRED and PODF
dividers when the driver calls set_rate to their GATE clock.)
Thank you
Nicolin
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolin Chen <nicoleotsuka@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@freescale.com>
Cc: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>,
timur@tabi.org, Li.Xiubo@freescale.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com,
broonie@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.de,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2014 19:24:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140917022440.GA3216@Asurada> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140917013251.GA4796@dragon>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 09:32:52AM +0800, Shawn Guo wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:19:28AM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 07:46:34PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > The spdif root clock may be used by other module or defined with
> > > CLK_SET_RATE_GATE, so we can't change the clock rate in driver.
> > > In this patch remove the clk_set_rate and clk_round_rate to protect the
> > > clock.
> >
> > It's a quite convenient and conservative way to remove the clock
> > dealing code in the driver, however, it may result less flexible
> > functionalities.
> >
> > The reason why I left the clk_set_rate() in the driver is to hope
> > we may find a better way to tackle those tough situations. For IP
> > itself, it doesn't matter if the clock the SoC provides to it is
> > being shared by other modules or not.
> >
> > So I think, if it's a shared clock, we should not define it as a
> > rate-changeable one in the SoC level, as we might still have some
> > SoCs provide a dedicated clock to S/PDIF so as to get the maximum
> > range of clock support for users.
> >
> > @Shawn
> > Sorry to involve you in this topic. I'm not so sure if we can do
> > this in the clock driver so that the clock rate would be fixed
> > even if the driver is trying to change it. If we can, I think we
> > may use a better solution here instead.
>
> No, we do not have anything like that today.
It's not supported in the clock API or just not implemented in our
code? Can we just register a clock without CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT to
achieve the purpose? (We are just trying to fix those PRED and PODF
dividers when the driver calls set_rate to their GATE clock.)
Thank you
Nicolin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-17 2:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-16 11:46 [PATCH] ASoC: fsl_spdif: don't change the root clock rate of spdif in driver Shengjiu Wang
2014-09-16 11:46 ` Shengjiu Wang
2014-09-16 11:46 ` Shengjiu Wang
2014-09-16 18:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-16 18:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-16 18:19 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-16 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-16 18:32 ` Mark Brown
2014-09-17 1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 1:32 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 2:24 ` Nicolin Chen [this message]
2014-09-17 2:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-17 2:24 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-17 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 2:31 ` Shawn Guo
2014-09-17 2:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-17 2:50 ` Nicolin Chen
2014-09-17 2:50 ` Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140917022440.GA3216@Asurada \
--to=nicoleotsuka@gmail.com \
--cc=Li.Xiubo@freescale.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=shawn.guo@freescale.com \
--cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
--cc=timur@tabi.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.