From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
Cc: wim@iguana.be, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: restart the counter immediately after enabling WDT
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:27:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140919172732.GA716@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411108199-1280-2-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:29:58PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The TOP_INIT may be zero, so the timeout period may be very short after
What is TOP_INIT ?
> initialization is done, thus the system may be reset soon after enabling.
> We fix this problem by restarting the counter immediately after enabling
> WDT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index 9f21029..ad0619d 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static int dw_wdt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> dw_wdt_set_top(DW_WDT_MAX_TOP);
This sets the timeout to the maximum, so I guess there must be some other
event/register (TOP_INIT ?) which can be zero.
> writel(WDOG_CONTROL_REG_WDT_EN_MASK,
> dw_wdt.regs + WDOG_CONTROL_REG_OFFSET);
What guarantees that the reset didn't already happen by the time
the keepalive call is executed ? Does this change fix the problem,
or does it just make it more unlikely to be seen ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> + dw_wdt_keepalive();
> }
>
> dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat();
> --
> 2.1.0
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: linux@roeck-us.net (Guenter Roeck)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: restart the counter immediately after enabling WDT
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2014 10:27:32 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140919172732.GA716@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1411108199-1280-2-git-send-email-jszhang@marvell.com>
On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:29:58PM +0800, Jisheng Zhang wrote:
> The TOP_INIT may be zero, so the timeout period may be very short after
What is TOP_INIT ?
> initialization is done, thus the system may be reset soon after enabling.
> We fix this problem by restarting the counter immediately after enabling
> WDT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@marvell.com>
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> index 9f21029..ad0619d 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/dw_wdt.c
> @@ -146,6 +146,7 @@ static int dw_wdt_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
> dw_wdt_set_top(DW_WDT_MAX_TOP);
This sets the timeout to the maximum, so I guess there must be some other
event/register (TOP_INIT ?) which can be zero.
> writel(WDOG_CONTROL_REG_WDT_EN_MASK,
> dw_wdt.regs + WDOG_CONTROL_REG_OFFSET);
What guarantees that the reset didn't already happen by the time
the keepalive call is executed ? Does this change fix the problem,
or does it just make it more unlikely to be seen ?
Thanks,
Guenter
> + dw_wdt_keepalive();
> }
>
> dw_wdt_set_next_heartbeat();
> --
> 2.1.0
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-19 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-19 6:29 [PATCH 0/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: one bug fix and restart handler support Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-19 6:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-19 6:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: restart the counter immediately after enabling WDT Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-19 6:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-19 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2014-09-19 17:27 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-20 13:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-20 13:51 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-23 7:45 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-23 7:45 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-19 6:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] watchdog: dw_wdt: add restart handler support Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-19 6:29 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-20 3:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-20 3:07 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-20 14:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-20 14:08 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-23 6:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-23 6:57 ` Jisheng Zhang
2014-09-20 21:09 ` Guenter Roeck
2014-09-20 21:09 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140919172732.GA716@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=jszhang@marvell.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wim@iguana.be \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.