From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"chris@zankel.net" <chris@zankel.net>,
"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
"jesper.nilsson@axis.com" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"monstr@monstr.eu" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"sam@ravnborg.org" <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926080551.GD31106@ulmo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4240583.SJ4jiIW6Zy@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2002 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:15:14PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 17:07:47 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > The current version doesn't let you do that, so I'll keel the #ifdef
> > sections separate. This also means that I won't apply your patch 17:
> > we will keep needing the #ifdef to support all three relevant combinations:
> >
> > a) architectures that provide neither and want to get the defaults
> > from asm-generic
> > b) architectures that provide the non-relaxed versions and want tog
> > to get just the relaxed version from asm-generic
> > c) architectures that provide both
> >
>
> And here is the new version I applied:
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> index 508a57257de5..3e976be3bdd4 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@ -174,6 +174,43 @@ static inline void writeq(u64 value, void __iomem *addr)
> #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
>
> /*
> + * {read,write}{b,w,l,q}_relaxed() are like the regular version, but
> + * are not guaranteed to provide ordering against spinlocks or memory
> + * accesses.
> + */
> +#ifndef readb_relaxed
> +#define readb_relaxed readb
> +#endif
My original patch to consolidate the read*/write*() and friends
explicitly avoided the use of macros to do this. The reason was that if
we have static inline functions in asm-generic/io.h it defines the
canonical prototype of these functions, so that architectures that want
to override them can just copy the prototype from there.
So for consistency the above would become:
#ifndef readb_relaxed
#define readb_relaxed readb_relaxed
static inline u8 readb_relaxed(const void __iomem *addr)
{
return readb(addr);
}
#endif
And analogously for the others. For the *_relaxed variants it's perhaps
not as important because the signature is the same as for the plain
variants, so I'm not objecting very strongly to the plain macros.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-arch@vger.kernel.org" <linux-arch@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"benh@kernel.crashing.org" <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
"chris@zankel.net" <chris@zankel.net>,
"cmetcalf@tilera.com" <cmetcalf@tilera.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"deller@gmx.de" <deller@gmx.de>,
"dhowells@redhat.com" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
"geert@linux-m68k.org" <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
"heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com" <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
"hpa@zytor.com" <hpa@zytor.com>,
"jcmvbkbc@gmail.com" <jcmvbkbc@gmail.com>,
"jesper.nilsson@axis.com" <jesper.nilsson@axis.com>,
"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
"monstr@monstr.eu" <monstr@monstr.eu>,
"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"rdunlap@infradead.org" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
"sam@ravnborg.org" <sam@ravnborg.org>,
"schwidefsky@de.ibm.com" <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
"starvik@axis.com" <starvik@axis.com>,
"takata@linux-m32r.org" <takata@linux-m32r.org>,
"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"tony.luck@intel.com" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
"daniel.thompson@linaro.org" <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>,
"broonie@linaro.org" <broonie@linaro.org>,
"linux@arm.linux.org.uk" <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2014 10:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140926080551.GD31106@ulmo> (raw)
Message-ID: <20140926080552.bStB-e40F8sROBq3aEbwx9KgqAvv-AMWgTb5sSTAEmk@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4240583.SJ4jiIW6Zy@wuerfel>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2002 bytes --]
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 05:15:14PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 25 September 2014 17:07:47 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > The current version doesn't let you do that, so I'll keel the #ifdef
> > sections separate. This also means that I won't apply your patch 17:
> > we will keep needing the #ifdef to support all three relevant combinations:
> >
> > a) architectures that provide neither and want to get the defaults
> > from asm-generic
> > b) architectures that provide the non-relaxed versions and want tog
> > to get just the relaxed version from asm-generic
> > c) architectures that provide both
> >
>
> And here is the new version I applied:
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/io.h b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> index 508a57257de5..3e976be3bdd4 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/io.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/io.h
> @@ -174,6 +174,43 @@ static inline void writeq(u64 value, void __iomem *addr)
> #endif /* CONFIG_64BIT */
>
> /*
> + * {read,write}{b,w,l,q}_relaxed() are like the regular version, but
> + * are not guaranteed to provide ordering against spinlocks or memory
> + * accesses.
> + */
> +#ifndef readb_relaxed
> +#define readb_relaxed readb
> +#endif
My original patch to consolidate the read*/write*() and friends
explicitly avoided the use of macros to do this. The reason was that if
we have static inline functions in asm-generic/io.h it defines the
canonical prototype of these functions, so that architectures that want
to override them can just copy the prototype from there.
So for consistency the above would become:
#ifndef readb_relaxed
#define readb_relaxed readb_relaxed
static inline u8 readb_relaxed(const void __iomem *addr)
{
return readb(addr);
}
#endif
And analogously for the others. For the *_relaxed variants it's perhaps
not as important because the signature is the same as for the plain
variants, so I'm not objecting very strongly to the plain macros.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-09-26 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-09-24 17:17 [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 01/17] asm-generic: io: implement relaxed accessor macros as conditional wrappers Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:32 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 10:38 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:38 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 10:43 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 11:44 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 11:44 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 02/17] microblaze: io: remove dummy relaxed accessor macros Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 03/17] s390: io: remove dummy relaxed accessor macros for reads Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 04/17] xtensa: " Will Deacon
2014-09-25 15:22 ` Max Filippov
2014-09-25 15:22 ` Max Filippov
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 05/17] frv: io: implement dummy relaxed accessor macros for writes Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 06/17] cris: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 07/17] ia64: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 08/17] m32r: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 09/17] m68k: " Will Deacon
2014-09-25 1:05 ` Greg Ungerer
2014-09-25 1:05 ` Greg Ungerer
2014-09-25 9:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 9:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 9:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-25 9:51 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-25 10:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:33 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 10/17] mn10300: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 11/17] parisc: " Will Deacon
2014-09-25 20:00 ` Helge Deller
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 12/17] powerpc: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 13/17] sparc: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 14/17] tile: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 15/17] x86: " Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 16/17] documentation: memory-barriers: clarify relaxed io accessor semantics Will Deacon
2014-09-24 17:17 ` [PATCH v3 17/17] asm-generic: io: define relaxed accessor macros unconditionally Will Deacon
2014-09-25 10:42 ` [PATCH v3 00/17] Cross-architecture definitions of relaxed MMIO accessors Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 13:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 14:55 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 14:55 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-25 15:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 15:07 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 15:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 15:15 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 15:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-09-25 15:24 ` Daniel Thompson
2014-09-25 19:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 19:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-25 20:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-25 20:17 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-09-26 8:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26 8:40 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 9:28 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 8:05 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2014-09-26 8:05 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-26 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 13:39 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 13:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26 13:46 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2014-09-26 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 21:36 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29 8:23 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-29 8:23 ` Thierry Reding
2014-09-29 9:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29 9:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 15:23 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-01 15:23 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-01 18:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 18:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29 9:25 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-29 9:25 ` Will Deacon
2014-09-29 9:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-29 9:48 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2014-10-30 16:59 ` Will Deacon
2014-10-30 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-30 20:04 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-31 11:09 ` Thierry Reding
2014-10-31 11:09 ` Thierry Reding
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140926080551.GD31106@ulmo \
--to=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=chris@zankel.net \
--cc=cmetcalf@tilera.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jcmvbkbc@gmail.com \
--cc=jesper.nilsson@axis.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=monstr@monstr.eu \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.