All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: remove use of gpiochip_remove() retval
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:14:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007091417.GM25331@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZVyxN+W_8s3Hvij0wu=bE-tyAFhJPVKumRvDkpUDuncA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav
> <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> wrote:
> 
> > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns
> > void.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>
> 
> Already fixed in the GPIO tree.

What does that mean?  That it doesn't need fixing here?

If this patch still needs applying it will carry more weight with your
Ack.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-gpio" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	"linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] mfd: remove use of gpiochip_remove() retval
Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2014 10:14:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141007091417.GM25331@lee--X1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACRpkdZVyxN+W_8s3Hvij0wu=bE-tyAFhJPVKumRvDkpUDuncA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, 01 Oct 2014, Linus Walleij wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Pramod Gurav
> <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com> wrote:
> 
> > Get rid of using return value from gpiochip_remove() as it returns
> > void.
> >
> > Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>
> > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
> > CC: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
> > Cc: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pramod Gurav <pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com>
> 
> Already fixed in the GPIO tree.

What does that mean?  That it doesn't need fixing here?

If this patch still needs applying it will carry more weight with your
Ack.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

  reply	other threads:[~2014-10-07  9:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-30 14:15 [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users of gpiochip_remove() retval Pramod Gurav
2014-09-30 14:15 ` [PATCH 2/2] mfd: remove use " Pramod Gurav
2014-10-01  7:45   ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-07  9:14     ` Lee Jones [this message]
2014-10-07  9:14       ` Lee Jones
2014-10-07  9:19       ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-07 10:02         ` Lee Jones
2014-10-07 10:02           ` Lee Jones
2014-10-01  7:43 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpio: remove remaining users " Linus Walleij
2014-10-01  7:52   ` Pramod Gurav

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141007091417.GM25331@lee--X1 \
    --to=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pramod.gurav@smartplayin.com \
    --cc=sameo@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.