All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] mmc: sh_mmcif: Increase MMCIF clock rate to 97.5MHz
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:09:10 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141121040907.GA31076@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjbvhoj0.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:13AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> > you are correct in assuming that this patch came from the BSP.
> > 
> > Is your opinion that a) changing the clock rate is good but
> > b) it needs to be done using a standard method?
> > 
> > If so, is the main change required to use a standard binding string
> > rather than "renesas,clk-rate"? Is the driver change above needed at all?
> 
> I'm not 100% understand, but, maybe these settings are required for
> MMC/SHDI's good performance.
> I guess we can use CCF method for it ?

That does sound like an idea worth investigating.
I wonder what the best way is to move this forwards.

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>
To: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>
Cc: Yoshihiro Kaneko <ykaneko0929@gmail.com>,
	linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball <chris@printf.net>,
	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] mmc: sh_mmcif: Increase MMCIF clock rate to 97.5MHz
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2014 04:09:10 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141121040907.GA31076@verge.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87zjbvhoj0.wl%kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com>

On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 01:34:13AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote:
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> > you are correct in assuming that this patch came from the BSP.
> > 
> > Is your opinion that a) changing the clock rate is good but
> > b) it needs to be done using a standard method?
> > 
> > If so, is the main change required to use a standard binding string
> > rather than "renesas,clk-rate"? Is the driver change above needed at all?
> 
> I'm not 100% understand, but, maybe these settings are required for
> MMC/SHDI's good performance.
> I guess we can use CCF method for it ?

That does sound like an idea worth investigating.
I wonder what the best way is to move this forwards.

  reply	other threads:[~2014-11-21  4:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-11-11  6:42 [PATCH/RFC] mmc: sh_mmcif: Increase MMCIF clock rate to 97.5MHz Yoshihiro Kaneko
2014-11-11  6:42 ` Yoshihiro Kaneko
2014-11-12  8:37 ` Ulf Hansson
2014-11-12  8:37   ` Ulf Hansson
2014-11-12 13:40 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-11-12 13:40   ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-11-13  0:15 ` Kuninori Morimoto
2014-11-13  0:24   ` Simon Horman
2014-11-13  0:24     ` Simon Horman
2014-11-13  1:34     ` Kuninori Morimoto
2014-11-21  4:09       ` Simon Horman [this message]
2014-11-21  4:09         ` Simon Horman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141121040907.GA31076@verge.net.au \
    --to=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=chris@printf.net \
    --cc=kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com \
    --cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
    --cc=ykaneko0929@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.