From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] i2c: sh_mobile: don't regress on deferred probing
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 15:19:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141210141912.GA8247@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUwsUakz7S_7xCob4__wR-PXcdpZKTGx0i_6ZatDeSvXg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 969 bytes --]
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> > Okay, here is my take on solving the problem found by Geert. I still don't like
> > it much but it is not as bad as I expected it to be ;) Let me know what you
> > think.
>
> Thanks, it's indeed less ugly than I would have expected ;-)
:D
> Note that in spi-rspi.c and spi-sh-msiof, any error returned by *_request_dma()
> is considered an error, and -EPROBE_DEFER is not handled specially.
> So it won't retry if the DMA engine driver isn't available, but just use PIO
> (until unbind/bind).
For historic reasons, i2c-sh_mobile uses subsys_initcall() and at that
time, DMA is never available. Converting to module_init() will just
create its own set of potential regressions :(
> Now we have a nice sample implementation, perhaps I should port it to
> spi-rspi and spi-sh-msiof, too?
>
> Let's wait and see for other comments...
Yeah, let's see first...
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux I2C <linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/2] i2c: sh_mobile: don't regress on deferred probing
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 14:19:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141210141912.GA8247@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdUwsUakz7S_7xCob4__wR-PXcdpZKTGx0i_6ZatDeSvXg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 969 bytes --]
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 2:21 PM, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote:
> > Okay, here is my take on solving the problem found by Geert. I still don't like
> > it much but it is not as bad as I expected it to be ;) Let me know what you
> > think.
>
> Thanks, it's indeed less ugly than I would have expected ;-)
:D
> Note that in spi-rspi.c and spi-sh-msiof, any error returned by *_request_dma()
> is considered an error, and -EPROBE_DEFER is not handled specially.
> So it won't retry if the DMA engine driver isn't available, but just use PIO
> (until unbind/bind).
For historic reasons, i2c-sh_mobile uses subsys_initcall() and at that
time, DMA is never available. Converting to module_init() will just
create its own set of potential regressions :(
> Now we have a nice sample implementation, perhaps I should port it to
> spi-rspi and spi-sh-msiof, too?
>
> Let's wait and see for other comments...
Yeah, let's see first...
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 14:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 13:21 [RFC 0/2] i2c: sh_mobile: don't regress on deferred probing Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [RFC 2/2] i2c: sh_mobile: rework " Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-10 13:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-16 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-16 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1418217709-26392-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [RFC 1/2] i2c: sh_mobile: refactor DMA setup Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 19:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-10 19:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-16 11:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-16 11:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-16 21:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-16 21:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-10 13:49 ` [RFC 0/2] i2c: sh_mobile: don't regress on deferred probing Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-10 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-10 14:19 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2014-12-10 14:19 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20141210141912.GA8247@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.