From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] i2c: sh_mobile: refactor DMA setup
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 22:06:34 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548899BA.40002@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418217709-26392-2-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
Hello.
On 12/10/2014 04:21 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Refactor DMA setup to keep the errno so we can implement better
> deferred probe support in the next step.
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
> index b9c8cf2aac2c..636f2297143a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
[...]
> @@ -749,21 +749,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id sh_mobile_i2c_dt_ids[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sh_mobile_i2c_dt_ids);
>
> -static int sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(struct device *dev, enum dma_transfer_direction dir,
> - dma_addr_t port_addr, struct dma_chan **chan_ptr)
> +static struct dma_chan *sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(struct device *dev,
> + enum dma_transfer_direction dir, dma_addr_t port_addr)
Hm, alignment style changed...
[...]
> @@ -891,13 +886,15 @@ static int sh_mobile_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> /* Init DMA */
> sg_init_table(&pd->sg, 1);
> pd->dma_direction = DMA_NONE;
> - ret = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> - res->start + ICDR, &pd->dma_rx);
> + pd->dma_rx = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> + res->start + ICDR);
The alignment of this line is strange: it's neither here nor there, i.e.
not aligned to the next char after ( above and still contains spaces. I think
we want the old way of the alignment kept, i.e. the line starting under
'pd->dev'...
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pd->dma_rx);
> if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> - res->start + ICDR, &pd->dma_tx);
> + pd->dma_tx = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> + res->start + ICDR);
Likewise.
[...]
WBR, Sergei
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>, linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] i2c: sh_mobile: refactor DMA setup
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2014 19:06:34 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <548899BA.40002@cogentembedded.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1418217709-26392-2-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
Hello.
On 12/10/2014 04:21 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> Refactor DMA setup to keep the errno so we can implement better
> deferred probe support in the next step.
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> ---
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++-------------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
> index b9c8cf2aac2c..636f2297143a 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c
[...]
> @@ -749,21 +749,18 @@ static const struct of_device_id sh_mobile_i2c_dt_ids[] = {
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sh_mobile_i2c_dt_ids);
>
> -static int sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(struct device *dev, enum dma_transfer_direction dir,
> - dma_addr_t port_addr, struct dma_chan **chan_ptr)
> +static struct dma_chan *sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(struct device *dev,
> + enum dma_transfer_direction dir, dma_addr_t port_addr)
Hm, alignment style changed...
[...]
> @@ -891,13 +886,15 @@ static int sh_mobile_i2c_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> /* Init DMA */
> sg_init_table(&pd->sg, 1);
> pd->dma_direction = DMA_NONE;
> - ret = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> - res->start + ICDR, &pd->dma_rx);
> + pd->dma_rx = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_DEV_TO_MEM,
> + res->start + ICDR);
The alignment of this line is strange: it's neither here nor there, i.e.
not aligned to the next char after ( above and still contains spaces. I think
we want the old way of the alignment kept, i.e. the line starting under
'pd->dev'...
> + ret = PTR_ERR(pd->dma_rx);
> if (ret = -EPROBE_DEFER)
> return ret;
>
> - ret = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> - res->start + ICDR, &pd->dma_tx);
> + pd->dma_tx = sh_mobile_i2c_request_dma_chan(pd->dev, DMA_MEM_TO_DEV,
> + res->start + ICDR);
Likewise.
[...]
WBR, Sergei
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-12-10 19:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-10 13:21 [RFC 0/2] i2c: sh_mobile: don't regress on deferred probing Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [RFC 2/2] i2c: sh_mobile: rework " Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-10 13:44 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-16 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-16 11:35 ` Wolfram Sang
[not found] ` <1418217709-26392-1-git-send-email-wsa-z923LK4zBo2bacvFa/9K2g@public.gmane.org>
2014-12-10 13:21 ` [RFC 1/2] i2c: sh_mobile: refactor DMA setup Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 13:21 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 19:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov [this message]
2014-12-10 19:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-16 11:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-16 11:34 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-16 21:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-16 21:06 ` Sergei Shtylyov
2014-12-10 13:49 ` [RFC 0/2] i2c: sh_mobile: don't regress on deferred probing Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-10 13:49 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2014-12-10 14:19 ` Wolfram Sang
2014-12-10 14:19 ` Wolfram Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=548899BA.40002@cogentembedded.com \
--to=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=horms@verge.net.au \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.