All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3: clock: fix boot breakage in legacy mode
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:58:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141215225855.GB23854@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7hfvcgixg5.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

* Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> [141215 10:26]:
> Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:
> 
> > On 12/12/2014 09:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Hi Tero,
> >>
> >> Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> The new usage of determine_rate and set_rate_and_parent calls for
> >>> OMAP DPLLs assumes the DPLLs must have two parents defined, even
> >>> if it is the same clock. Legacy clock data did not fullfill this
> >>> requirement and caused a boot crash. Fixed by adding the missing
> >>> parent information to the DPLL clocks.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> >>> Fixes: 2e1a7b014f ("ARM: OMAP3+: DPLL: use determine_rate() and...")
> >>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> I tested this on linux-next (next-20141210, same version where I found
> >> the bug) and this doesn't fix the boot problem.
> >>
> >> BTW, in testing this, I noticed that the OMAP clock code is still
> >> spitting out compile warnings[1].  These should cleaned up too.
> >
> > Did you apply both of my patches from this set?
> 
> No, I didn't.  That wasn't clear (to me) from the changelogs.

The first one Mike is alredy fixing in his clock branch AFAIK.
 
> > I think the DPLL fix might be required also to get this working
> > properly on OMAP3 legacy.
> 
> Yup, with both applied, it's now booting fine on omap3-beagle-xm legacy
> mode.
> 
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> 
> And, please add:
> 
> Reported-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> 
> (c.f. Reported-by section in Documentation/SubmittingPatches).  

I'll queue the second one separately after Mike's clock changes
hit mainline.

Thanks,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3: clock: fix boot breakage in legacy mode
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:58:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20141215225855.GB23854@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7hfvcgixg5.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>

* Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org> [141215 10:26]:
> Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:
> 
> > On 12/12/2014 09:07 PM, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> >> Hi Tero,
> >>
> >> Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> writes:
> >>
> >>> The new usage of determine_rate and set_rate_and_parent calls for
> >>> OMAP DPLLs assumes the DPLLs must have two parents defined, even
> >>> if it is the same clock. Legacy clock data did not fullfill this
> >>> requirement and caused a boot crash. Fixed by adding the missing
> >>> parent information to the DPLL clocks.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> >>> Fixes: 2e1a7b014f ("ARM: OMAP3+: DPLL: use determine_rate() and...")
> >>> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>
> >>
> >> I tested this on linux-next (next-20141210, same version where I found
> >> the bug) and this doesn't fix the boot problem.
> >>
> >> BTW, in testing this, I noticed that the OMAP clock code is still
> >> spitting out compile warnings[1].  These should cleaned up too.
> >
> > Did you apply both of my patches from this set?
> 
> No, I didn't.  That wasn't clear (to me) from the changelogs.

The first one Mike is alredy fixing in his clock branch AFAIK.
 
> > I think the DPLL fix might be required also to get this working
> > properly on OMAP3 legacy.
> 
> Yup, with both applied, it's now booting fine on omap3-beagle-xm legacy
> mode.
> 
> Tested-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> 
> And, please add:
> 
> Reported-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
> 
> (c.f. Reported-by section in Documentation/SubmittingPatches).  

I'll queue the second one separately after Mike's clock changes
hit mainline.

Thanks,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2014-12-15 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-12 13:21 [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: quick clock fixes for linux-next Tero Kristo
2014-12-12 13:21 ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-12 13:22 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: OMAP2+: clock: fix DPLL code to use new determine rate APIs Tero Kristo
2014-12-12 13:22   ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-12 13:22 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: OMAP3: clock: fix boot breakage in legacy mode Tero Kristo
2014-12-12 13:22   ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-12 19:07   ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-12 19:07     ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-15  7:56     ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-15  7:56       ` Tero Kristo
2014-12-15 18:23       ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-15 18:23         ` Kevin Hilman
2014-12-15 22:58         ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2014-12-15 22:58           ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-16  0:52           ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-16  0:52             ` Tony Lindgren
2014-12-15  4:35 ` [PATCH 0/2] ARM: OMAP2+: quick clock fixes for linux-next Vignesh R
2014-12-15  4:35   ` Vignesh R

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20141215225855.GB23854@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=khilman@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.