From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] nfs: don't dirty ITER_BVEC pages read through direct I/O
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150108092519.GA2673@mew> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AAA27C.6040906@Netapp.com>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:41:00AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> On 12/19/2014 10:18 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > As with the generic blockdev code, kernel pages shouldn't be dirtied by
> > the direct I/O path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/direct.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > index 10bf072..b6ca65c 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct nfs_direct_req {
> > struct pnfs_ds_commit_info ds_cinfo; /* Storage for cinfo */
> > struct work_struct work;
> > int flags;
> > + int should_dirty; /* should we mark read pages dirty? */
> > #define NFS_ODIRECT_DO_COMMIT (1) /* an unstable reply was received */
> > #define NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES (2) /* write verification failed */
> > struct nfs_writeverf verf; /* unstable write verifier */
>
> Can you add should_dirty after the NFS_ODIRECT_* flags?
>
> Thanks,
> Anna
>
> > @@ -370,7 +371,8 @@ static void nfs_direct_read_completion(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
> > struct nfs_page *req = nfs_list_entry(hdr->pages.next);
> > struct page *page = req->wb_page;
> >
> > - if (!PageCompound(page) && bytes < hdr->good_bytes)
> > + if (!PageCompound(page) && bytes < hdr->good_bytes &&
> > + dreq->should_dirty)
> > set_page_dirty(page);
> > bytes += req->wb_bytes;
> > nfs_list_remove_request(req);
> > @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> > dreq->inode = inode;
> > dreq->bytes_left = count;
> > dreq->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(nfs_file_open_context(iocb->ki_filp));
> > + dreq->should_dirty = !iov_iter_is_bvec(iter);
> > l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(dreq->ctx);
> > if (IS_ERR(l_ctx)) {
> > result = PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
> >
>
Thanks, Anna, I'll fix that.
--
Omar
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov-nWWhXC5lh1RBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker-HgOvQuBEEgTQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Alexander Viro
<viro-RmSDqhL/yNMiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>,
Andrew Morton
<akpm-de/tnXTf+JLsfHDXvbKv3WD2FQJk+8+b@public.gmane.org>,
Trond Myklebust
<trond.myklebust-7I+n7zu2hftEKMMhf/gKZA@public.gmane.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch-wEGCiKHe2LqWVfeAwA7xHQ@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-mm-Bw31MaZKKs3YtjvyW6yDsg@public.gmane.org,
linux-nfs-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] nfs: don't dirty ITER_BVEC pages read through direct I/O
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150108092519.GA2673@mew> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AAA27C.6040906-ZwjVKphTwtPQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:41:00AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> On 12/19/2014 10:18 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > As with the generic blockdev code, kernel pages shouldn't be dirtied by
> > the direct I/O path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov-nWWhXC5lh1RBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/direct.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > index 10bf072..b6ca65c 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct nfs_direct_req {
> > struct pnfs_ds_commit_info ds_cinfo; /* Storage for cinfo */
> > struct work_struct work;
> > int flags;
> > + int should_dirty; /* should we mark read pages dirty? */
> > #define NFS_ODIRECT_DO_COMMIT (1) /* an unstable reply was received */
> > #define NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES (2) /* write verification failed */
> > struct nfs_writeverf verf; /* unstable write verifier */
>
> Can you add should_dirty after the NFS_ODIRECT_* flags?
>
> Thanks,
> Anna
>
> > @@ -370,7 +371,8 @@ static void nfs_direct_read_completion(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
> > struct nfs_page *req = nfs_list_entry(hdr->pages.next);
> > struct page *page = req->wb_page;
> >
> > - if (!PageCompound(page) && bytes < hdr->good_bytes)
> > + if (!PageCompound(page) && bytes < hdr->good_bytes &&
> > + dreq->should_dirty)
> > set_page_dirty(page);
> > bytes += req->wb_bytes;
> > nfs_list_remove_request(req);
> > @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> > dreq->inode = inode;
> > dreq->bytes_left = count;
> > dreq->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(nfs_file_open_context(iocb->ki_filp));
> > + dreq->should_dirty = !iov_iter_is_bvec(iter);
> > l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(dreq->ctx);
> > if (IS_ERR(l_ctx)) {
> > result = PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
> >
>
Thanks, Anna, I'll fix that.
--
Omar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-nfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
To: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] nfs: don't dirty ITER_BVEC pages read through direct I/O
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 01:25:19 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150108092519.GA2673@mew> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54AAA27C.6040906@Netapp.com>
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 09:41:00AM -0500, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> Hi Omar,
>
> On 12/19/2014 10:18 PM, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > As with the generic blockdev code, kernel pages shouldn't be dirtied by
> > the direct I/O path.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@osandov.com>
> > ---
> > fs/nfs/direct.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/nfs/direct.c b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > index 10bf072..b6ca65c 100644
> > --- a/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > +++ b/fs/nfs/direct.c
> > @@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ struct nfs_direct_req {
> > struct pnfs_ds_commit_info ds_cinfo; /* Storage for cinfo */
> > struct work_struct work;
> > int flags;
> > + int should_dirty; /* should we mark read pages dirty? */
> > #define NFS_ODIRECT_DO_COMMIT (1) /* an unstable reply was received */
> > #define NFS_ODIRECT_RESCHED_WRITES (2) /* write verification failed */
> > struct nfs_writeverf verf; /* unstable write verifier */
>
> Can you add should_dirty after the NFS_ODIRECT_* flags?
>
> Thanks,
> Anna
>
> > @@ -370,7 +371,8 @@ static void nfs_direct_read_completion(struct nfs_pgio_header *hdr)
> > struct nfs_page *req = nfs_list_entry(hdr->pages.next);
> > struct page *page = req->wb_page;
> >
> > - if (!PageCompound(page) && bytes < hdr->good_bytes)
> > + if (!PageCompound(page) && bytes < hdr->good_bytes &&
> > + dreq->should_dirty)
> > set_page_dirty(page);
> > bytes += req->wb_bytes;
> > nfs_list_remove_request(req);
> > @@ -542,6 +544,7 @@ ssize_t nfs_file_direct_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter,
> > dreq->inode = inode;
> > dreq->bytes_left = count;
> > dreq->ctx = get_nfs_open_context(nfs_file_open_context(iocb->ki_filp));
> > + dreq->should_dirty = !iov_iter_is_bvec(iter);
> > l_ctx = nfs_get_lock_context(dreq->ctx);
> > if (IS_ERR(l_ctx)) {
> > result = PTR_ERR(l_ctx);
> >
>
Thanks, Anna, I'll fix that.
--
Omar
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-08 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-12-20 3:18 [PATCH v2 0/5] clean up and generalize swap-over-NFS Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] iov_iter: add ITER_BVEC helpers Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] direct-io: don't dirty ITER_BVEC pages on read Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 6:01 ` Al Viro
2014-12-20 6:01 ` Al Viro
2014-12-22 7:12 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-22 7:12 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] nfs: don't dirty ITER_BVEC pages read through direct I/O Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-05 14:41 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 14:41 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-01-05 14:41 ` Anna Schumaker
2015-01-08 9:25 ` Omar Sandoval [this message]
2015-01-08 9:25 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-08 9:25 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] swapfile: use ->read_iter and ->write_iter Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 6:13 ` Al Viro
2014-12-20 6:13 ` Al Viro
2014-12-22 7:32 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-22 7:32 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-22 7:32 ` Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] vfs: update swap_{,de}activate documentation Omar Sandoval
2014-12-20 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-14 3:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] clean up and generalize swap-over-NFS Omar Sandoval
2015-01-14 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-14 3:18 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-21 19:14 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-21 19:14 ` Omar Sandoval
2015-01-21 19:14 ` Omar Sandoval
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150108092519.GA2673@mew \
--to=osandov@osandov.com \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@netapp.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.