All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:14:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com> (raw)

Hi all,

Looks like the legacy IRQ numbers are now all wrong at least for omap4
since commit 9a1091ef0017 ("irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain.").

Instead of this:

# cat /proc/interrupts 
            CPU0       CPU1       
 29:       1124        981       GIC  29  twd
 39:          0          0       GIC  39  TWL6030-PIH
 41:          0          0       GIC  41  l3-dbg-irq
 42:          0          0       GIC  42  l3-app-irq
 44:          0          0       GIC  44  DMA
 45:       7854          0       GIC  45  omap-dma-engine
 52:          0          0       GIC  52  gpmc
...


We now have:

# cat /proc/interrupts 
            CPU0       CPU1       
 16:        343          0       GIC  69  gp_timer
 17:       1160       1017       GIC  29  twd
 18:          0          0       GIC  41  l3-dbg-irq
 19:          1          0       GIC  42  l3-app-irq
 22:       7850          0       GIC  45  omap-dma-engine
 44:          0          0  4a310000.gpio  18  DMA
 61:       2730          0  48055000.gpio   2  eth0
223:          0          0       GIC  52  gpmc
...

So the DMA interrupt using the legacy mapping with something like
irq = 12 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START now is wrong and unfortunately
at least omaps still have a bunch of the legacy interrupts still
around.

And that naturally produces all kinds of strange errors like:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147 l3_interrupt_handler+0x214/0x340()
44000000.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER MPU TARGET L4CFG (Idle): Data Access in Supervisor mode during Functional access
...
[<c05f21e4>] (__irq_svc) from [<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44)
[<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore) from [<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq+0x244/0x530)
[<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq) from [<c00917d4>] (setup_irq+0x40/0x8c)
[<c00917d4>] (setup_irq) from [<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe+0x1d4/0x2b4)
[<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe) from [<c03b2200>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
...

Looks like the logic changed from:

if (of_property_read_u32(node, "arm,routable-irqs", &nr_routable_irqs))

to just

if (node)

Which now causes irq_domain_add_linear() to be called instead of
irq_domain_add_legacy(), which causes the breakage.

Anybody got a sane fix in mind for the -rc series, or should we just
revert it for now?

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:14:08 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com> (raw)

Hi all,

Looks like the legacy IRQ numbers are now all wrong at least for omap4
since commit 9a1091ef0017 ("irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain.").

Instead of this:

# cat /proc/interrupts 
            CPU0       CPU1       
 29:       1124        981       GIC  29  twd
 39:          0          0       GIC  39  TWL6030-PIH
 41:          0          0       GIC  41  l3-dbg-irq
 42:          0          0       GIC  42  l3-app-irq
 44:          0          0       GIC  44  DMA
 45:       7854          0       GIC  45  omap-dma-engine
 52:          0          0       GIC  52  gpmc
...


We now have:

# cat /proc/interrupts 
            CPU0       CPU1       
 16:        343          0       GIC  69  gp_timer
 17:       1160       1017       GIC  29  twd
 18:          0          0       GIC  41  l3-dbg-irq
 19:          1          0       GIC  42  l3-app-irq
 22:       7850          0       GIC  45  omap-dma-engine
 44:          0          0  4a310000.gpio  18  DMA
 61:       2730          0  48055000.gpio   2  eth0
223:          0          0       GIC  52  gpmc
...

So the DMA interrupt using the legacy mapping with something like
irq = 12 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START now is wrong and unfortunately
at least omaps still have a bunch of the legacy interrupts still
around.

And that naturally produces all kinds of strange errors like:

WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147 l3_interrupt_handler+0x214/0x340()
44000000.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER MPU TARGET L4CFG (Idle): Data Access in Supervisor mode during Functional access
...
[<c05f21e4>] (__irq_svc) from [<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44)
[<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore) from [<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq+0x244/0x530)
[<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq) from [<c00917d4>] (setup_irq+0x40/0x8c)
[<c00917d4>] (setup_irq) from [<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe+0x1d4/0x2b4)
[<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe) from [<c03b2200>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
...

Looks like the logic changed from:

if (of_property_read_u32(node, "arm,routable-irqs", &nr_routable_irqs))

to just

if (node)

Which now causes irq_domain_add_linear() to be called instead of
irq_domain_add_legacy(), which causes the breakage.

Anybody got a sane fix in mind for the -rc series, or should we just
revert it for now?

Regards,

Tony

             reply	other threads:[~2015-01-14 22:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-14 22:14 Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-01-14 22:14 ` Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017 Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 10:50   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 15:28   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 15:28     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 17:19     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 17:19       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:21       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:21         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:30         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:30           ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:41           ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:41             ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:46             ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-16 16:46               ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-16 17:22             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 17:22               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 17:29               ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 17:29                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:52                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:52                   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:57                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 22:57                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 22:57                     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:57                       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 13:42   ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 14:27   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 14:27     ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 14:43     ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 14:43       ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 15:37       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 15:37         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:56         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-16 16:56           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-16 17:23           ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-16 17:23             ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-17  0:48             ` Simon Horman
2015-01-17  0:48               ` Simon Horman
2015-01-15 16:37       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 16:37         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.