From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Subject: Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:14:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Looks like the legacy IRQ numbers are now all wrong at least for omap4
since commit 9a1091ef0017 ("irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain.").
Instead of this:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
29: 1124 981 GIC 29 twd
39: 0 0 GIC 39 TWL6030-PIH
41: 0 0 GIC 41 l3-dbg-irq
42: 0 0 GIC 42 l3-app-irq
44: 0 0 GIC 44 DMA
45: 7854 0 GIC 45 omap-dma-engine
52: 0 0 GIC 52 gpmc
...
We now have:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
16: 343 0 GIC 69 gp_timer
17: 1160 1017 GIC 29 twd
18: 0 0 GIC 41 l3-dbg-irq
19: 1 0 GIC 42 l3-app-irq
22: 7850 0 GIC 45 omap-dma-engine
44: 0 0 4a310000.gpio 18 DMA
61: 2730 0 48055000.gpio 2 eth0
223: 0 0 GIC 52 gpmc
...
So the DMA interrupt using the legacy mapping with something like
irq = 12 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START now is wrong and unfortunately
at least omaps still have a bunch of the legacy interrupts still
around.
And that naturally produces all kinds of strange errors like:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147 l3_interrupt_handler+0x214/0x340()
44000000.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER MPU TARGET L4CFG (Idle): Data Access in Supervisor mode during Functional access
...
[<c05f21e4>] (__irq_svc) from [<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44)
[<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore) from [<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq+0x244/0x530)
[<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq) from [<c00917d4>] (setup_irq+0x40/0x8c)
[<c00917d4>] (setup_irq) from [<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe+0x1d4/0x2b4)
[<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe) from [<c03b2200>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
...
Looks like the logic changed from:
if (of_property_read_u32(node, "arm,routable-irqs", &nr_routable_irqs))
to just
if (node)
Which now causes irq_domain_add_linear() to be called instead of
irq_domain_add_legacy(), which causes the breakage.
Anybody got a sane fix in mind for the -rc series, or should we just
revert it for now?
Regards,
Tony
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017
Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:14:08 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com> (raw)
Hi all,
Looks like the legacy IRQ numbers are now all wrong at least for omap4
since commit 9a1091ef0017 ("irqchip: gic: Support hierarchy irq domain.").
Instead of this:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
29: 1124 981 GIC 29 twd
39: 0 0 GIC 39 TWL6030-PIH
41: 0 0 GIC 41 l3-dbg-irq
42: 0 0 GIC 42 l3-app-irq
44: 0 0 GIC 44 DMA
45: 7854 0 GIC 45 omap-dma-engine
52: 0 0 GIC 52 gpmc
...
We now have:
# cat /proc/interrupts
CPU0 CPU1
16: 343 0 GIC 69 gp_timer
17: 1160 1017 GIC 29 twd
18: 0 0 GIC 41 l3-dbg-irq
19: 1 0 GIC 42 l3-app-irq
22: 7850 0 GIC 45 omap-dma-engine
44: 0 0 4a310000.gpio 18 DMA
61: 2730 0 48055000.gpio 2 eth0
223: 0 0 GIC 52 gpmc
...
So the DMA interrupt using the legacy mapping with something like
irq = 12 + OMAP44XX_IRQ_GIC_START now is wrong and unfortunately
at least omaps still have a bunch of the legacy interrupts still
around.
And that naturally produces all kinds of strange errors like:
WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1 at drivers/bus/omap_l3_noc.c:147 l3_interrupt_handler+0x214/0x340()
44000000.ocp:L3 Custom Error: MASTER MPU TARGET L4CFG (Idle): Data Access in Supervisor mode during Functional access
...
[<c05f21e4>] (__irq_svc) from [<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x34/0x44)
[<c05f1974>] (_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore) from [<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq+0x244/0x530)
[<c00914a8>] (__setup_irq) from [<c00917d4>] (setup_irq+0x40/0x8c)
[<c00917d4>] (setup_irq) from [<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe+0x1d4/0x2b4)
[<c0039c8c>] (omap_system_dma_probe) from [<c03b2200>] (platform_drv_probe+0x44/0xa4)
...
Looks like the logic changed from:
if (of_property_read_u32(node, "arm,routable-irqs", &nr_routable_irqs))
to just
if (node)
Which now causes irq_domain_add_linear() to be called instead of
irq_domain_add_legacy(), which causes the breakage.
Anybody got a sane fix in mind for the -rc series, or should we just
revert it for now?
Regards,
Tony
next reply other threads:[~2015-01-14 22:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-14 22:14 Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-01-14 22:14 ` Regression with legacy IRQ numbers caused by 9a1091ef0017 Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 10:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 15:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 17:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-15 17:19 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:30 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 16:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:41 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-16 16:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2015-01-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 17:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 17:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 17:29 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:52 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 22:57 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 22:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 22:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 13:42 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 14:27 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 14:43 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-15 15:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-15 15:37 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-01-16 16:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-16 16:56 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-16 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-16 17:23 ` Marc Zyngier
2015-01-17 0:48 ` Simon Horman
2015-01-17 0:48 ` Simon Horman
2015-01-15 16:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-15 16:37 ` Arnd Bergmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150114221407.GS2419@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=jason@lakedaemon.net \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yingjoe.chen@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.