From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:07:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116110742.GJ3843@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B8EF15.4000602@linaro.org>
On 16/01/2015 at 11:59:33 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
> On 01/16/2015 11:48 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 16/01/2015 at 11:39:16 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
> >>>Isn't that already the case?
> >>>Right now, if you call clocksource_suspend, it doesn't matter whether
> >>>the clocksource has an enable or not, it will be suspended. Maybe I'm
> >>>mistaken but my patch doesn't seem to change that behaviour.
> >>
> >>Actually, if there is no enable/disable callback, then CLOCK_SOURCE_USED
> >>will be never set, hence the condition will always fail and the suspend
> >>callback won't be called.
> >>
> >
> >It is set in clocksource_enable/disable, even if there is no
> >enable/disable callback.
>
> Ah, right. But shouldn't we set the flag only if the callback is present and
> succeed as Boris mentioned it ?
>
What Boris was suggesting was that if the enable exist, set it only if
it succeed. Which gives something like that:
int clocksource_enable(struct clocksource *cs)
{
int ret = 0;
if (cs->enable)
ret = cs->enable(cs);
if (!ret)
cs->flags |= CLOCK_SOURCE_USED;
return 0;
}
I will use that version in v2.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 12:07:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150116110742.GJ3843@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <54B8EF15.4000602@linaro.org>
On 16/01/2015 at 11:59:33 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
> On 01/16/2015 11:48 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >On 16/01/2015 at 11:39:16 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
> >>>Isn't that already the case?
> >>>Right now, if you call clocksource_suspend, it doesn't matter whether
> >>>the clocksource has an enable or not, it will be suspended. Maybe I'm
> >>>mistaken but my patch doesn't seem to change that behaviour.
> >>
> >>Actually, if there is no enable/disable callback, then CLOCK_SOURCE_USED
> >>will be never set, hence the condition will always fail and the suspend
> >>callback won't be called.
> >>
> >
> >It is set in clocksource_enable/disable, even if there is no
> >enable/disable callback.
>
> Ah, right. But shouldn't we set the flag only if the callback is present and
> succeed as Boris mentioned it ?
>
What Boris was suggesting was that if the enable exist, set it only if
it succeed. Which gives something like that:
int clocksource_enable(struct clocksource *cs)
{
int ret = 0;
if (cs->enable)
ret = cs->enable(cs);
if (!ret)
cs->flags |= CLOCK_SOURCE_USED;
return 0;
}
I will use that version in v2.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 11:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-16 9:17 [RFC 0/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 9:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 9:17 ` [RFC 1/2] clocksource: track usage Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 9:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-16 10:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-02 20:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-02-02 20:03 ` Kevin Hilman
2015-01-16 9:17 ` [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 9:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-16 10:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-16 10:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:35 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 10:39 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 10:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:48 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 10:59 ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 11:07 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-01-16 11:07 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:45 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 11:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 11:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150116110742.GJ3843@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.