All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: daniel.lezcano@linaro.org (Daniel Lezcano)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:59:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B8EF15.4000602@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150116104804.GE3843@piout.net>

On 01/16/2015 11:48 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/01/2015 at 11:39:16 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
>>> Isn't that already the case?
>>> Right now, if you call clocksource_suspend, it doesn't matter whether
>>> the clocksource has an enable or not, it will be suspended. Maybe I'm
>>> mistaken but my patch doesn't seem to change that behaviour.
>>
>> Actually, if there is no enable/disable callback, then CLOCK_SOURCE_USED
>> will be never set, hence the condition will always fail and the suspend
>> callback won't be called.
>>
>
> It is set in clocksource_enable/disable, even if there is no
> enable/disable callback.

Ah, right. But shouldn't we set the flag only if the callback is present 
and succeed as Boris mentioned it ?

> I only found direct calls to ->enable() in
> timekeeper.c, did I miss some?




-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org ? Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
	Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 11:59:33 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B8EF15.4000602@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150116104804.GE3843@piout.net>

On 01/16/2015 11:48 AM, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 16/01/2015 at 11:39:16 +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote :
>>> Isn't that already the case?
>>> Right now, if you call clocksource_suspend, it doesn't matter whether
>>> the clocksource has an enable or not, it will be suspended. Maybe I'm
>>> mistaken but my patch doesn't seem to change that behaviour.
>>
>> Actually, if there is no enable/disable callback, then CLOCK_SOURCE_USED
>> will be never set, hence the condition will always fail and the suspend
>> callback won't be called.
>>
>
> It is set in clocksource_enable/disable, even if there is no
> enable/disable callback.

Ah, right. But shouldn't we set the flag only if the callback is present 
and succeed as Boris mentioned it ?

> I only found direct calls to ->enable() in
> timekeeper.c, did I miss some?




-- 
  <http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs

Follow Linaro:  <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog


  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-16 10:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-16  9:17 [RFC 0/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16  9:17 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16  9:17 ` [RFC 1/2] clocksource: track usage Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16  9:17   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:39   ` Boris Brezillon
2015-01-16 10:39     ` Boris Brezillon
2015-02-02 20:03   ` Kevin Hilman
2015-02-02 20:03     ` Kevin Hilman
2015-01-16  9:17 ` [RFC 2/2] clocksource: don't suspend/resume when unused Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16  9:17   ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:23   ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-16 10:23     ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-01-16 10:35     ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:35       ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:39       ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 10:39         ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 10:48         ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:48           ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:59           ` Daniel Lezcano [this message]
2015-01-16 10:59             ` Daniel Lezcano
2015-01-16 11:07             ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:07               ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:45               ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:45                 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:23       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 11:23         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-01-16 11:28         ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 11:28           ` Alexandre Belloni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=54B8EF15.4000602@linaro.org \
    --to=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.