From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123101123.GF19922@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D0221EB9-B6B3-4860-83D6-427E3C718193@jcrosoft.com>
On 23/01/2015 at 15:50:13 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
>
> > On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Newer SoCs: at91sam9x5, at91sam9n12, sama5d3 and sama5d4 embed a DDR controller
> > and have a different PMC status register layout than the at91sam9g45. Create
> > another at91_sam9x5_pm_init() function to match this compatibility.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 2 ++
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 7 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > index 0fe1ced608c5..c8252ddac6f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > @@ -61,3 +61,23 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9g45_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9G45")
> > .init_machine = sam9g45_dt_device_init,
> > .dt_compat = at91_9g45_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> > +
> > +static void __init sam9x5_dt_device_init(void)
> > +{
> > + at91_sam9x5_pm_init();
> > + of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char *at91_9x5_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> > + "atmel,at91sam9x5",
> > + "atmel,at91sam9n12",
> > + NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9x5_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9?)
> sam9? sam9x5
> > + /* Maintainer: Atmel */
> > + .map_io = at91_map_io,
> > + .init_early = at91_dt_initialize,
> > + .init_machine = sam9x5_dt_device_init,
> > + .dt_compat = at91_9x5_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
>
> why a second START instead of a pdata?
>
> and create a second dt compatible
> e
The real solution to that is to match the pmc compatible in pm.c
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Cc: Nicolas FERRE <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wenyou Yang <wenyou.yang@atmel.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@atmel.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2015 11:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150123101123.GF19922@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <D0221EB9-B6B3-4860-83D6-427E3C718193@jcrosoft.com>
On 23/01/2015 at 15:50:13 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
>
> > On Jan 23, 2015, at 12:07 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Newer SoCs: at91sam9x5, at91sam9n12, sama5d3 and sama5d4 embed a DDR controller
> > and have a different PMC status register layout than the at91sam9g45. Create
> > another at91_sam9x5_pm_init() function to match this compatibility.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c | 2 +-
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 2 ++
> > arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 7 +++++++
> > 4 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > index 0fe1ced608c5..c8252ddac6f0 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c
> > @@ -61,3 +61,23 @@ DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9g45_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9G45")
> > .init_machine = sam9g45_dt_device_init,
> > .dt_compat = at91_9g45_board_compat,
> > MACHINE_END
> > +
> > +static void __init sam9x5_dt_device_init(void)
> > +{
> > + at91_sam9x5_pm_init();
> > + of_platform_populate(NULL, of_default_bus_match_table, NULL, NULL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const char *at91_9x5_board_compat[] __initconst = {
> > + "atmel,at91sam9x5",
> > + "atmel,at91sam9n12",
> > + NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +DT_MACHINE_START(at91sam9x5_dt, "Atmel AT91SAM9”)
> sam9? sam9x5
> > + /* Maintainer: Atmel */
> > + .map_io = at91_map_io,
> > + .init_early = at91_dt_initialize,
> > + .init_machine = sam9x5_dt_device_init,
> > + .dt_compat = at91_9x5_board_compat,
> > +MACHINE_END
>
> why a second START instead of a pdata?
>
> and create a second dt compatible
> e
The real solution to that is to match the pmc compatible in pm.c
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-23 10:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2 Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: at91: pm: rework cpu detection Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 2:44 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-16 2:44 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-16 10:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: at91: pm: add UDP and UHP checks to newer SoCs Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: at91: pm: prepare for multiplatform Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-22 16:03 ` [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:03 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-23 7:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-23 7:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-23 10:11 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-01-23 10:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: at91: remove useless map_io Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ARM: at91: sama5d4: remove useless call to at91_init_sram Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: at91: remove unused at91_init_sram Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: at91: move at91rm9200_idle() to clk/at91/pmc.c Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2 Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-16 17:11 ` Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150123101123.GF19922@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.