From: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com (Nicolas Ferre)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B9463B.2020304@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421333971-7581-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Le 15/01/2015 15:59, Alexandre Belloni a ?crit :
> This patch sets is based on AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #1
> and depends on AT91 DT for 3.20 #1 because it uses the added SRAM nodes.
>
> The first two patches rework the pm code to get rid of cpu_is_xxx (they will be
> dropped soon) and use the SRAM from the genpool instead of relying on the remap
> done by at91_init_sram.
>
> The 3rd and 4th patches a reworking the pm code further to move at91_pm_init in
> the .init_machine of the SoCs instead of arch_initcall, to get ready for
> multiplatform.
>
> Then the following patches get rid of at91_init_sram, taking .map_io for almost
> all SoCs but the sama5d4 (more cleanups coming soon for that part).
>
> The final patch moves at91rm9200_idle to clk/at91/pmc.c and allows to almost
> empty arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c (It is actually empty once "Atmel System
> Timer cleanups" is applied).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - added patch 3 and 4 to remove the calls to of_machine_is_compatible()
>
> Alexandre Belloni (8):
> ARM: at91: pm: rework cpu detection
> ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM
> ARM: at91: pm: add UDP and UHP checks to newer SoCs
> ARM: at91: pm: prepare for multiplatform
> ARM: at91: remove useless map_io
> ARM: at91: sama5d4: remove useless call to at91_init_sram
> ARM: at91: remove unused at91_init_sram
> ARM: at91: move at91rm9200_idle() to clk/at91/pmc.c
Okay for the whole series. I'm looking forward including the upcoming
one as well.
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
All stacked on top of at91-3.20-cleanup.
Thanks, bye.
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c | 15 -----
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c | 27 ---------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c | 9 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | 7 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | 7 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c | 6 --
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 18 ------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9x5.c | 6 --
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c | 11 ++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c | 27 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 15 ++++-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c | 6 --
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d4.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 20 -------
> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 9 +++
> 18 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Cc: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com>,
"Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard" <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2015 18:11:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <54B9463B.2020304@atmel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1421333971-7581-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Le 15/01/2015 15:59, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
> This patch sets is based on AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #1
> and depends on AT91 DT for 3.20 #1 because it uses the added SRAM nodes.
>
> The first two patches rework the pm code to get rid of cpu_is_xxx (they will be
> dropped soon) and use the SRAM from the genpool instead of relying on the remap
> done by at91_init_sram.
>
> The 3rd and 4th patches a reworking the pm code further to move at91_pm_init in
> the .init_machine of the SoCs instead of arch_initcall, to get ready for
> multiplatform.
>
> Then the following patches get rid of at91_init_sram, taking .map_io for almost
> all SoCs but the sama5d4 (more cleanups coming soon for that part).
>
> The final patch moves at91rm9200_idle to clk/at91/pmc.c and allows to almost
> empty arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c (It is actually empty once "Atmel System
> Timer cleanups" is applied).
>
> Changes in v2:
> - added patch 3 and 4 to remove the calls to of_machine_is_compatible()
>
> Alexandre Belloni (8):
> ARM: at91: pm: rework cpu detection
> ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM
> ARM: at91: pm: add UDP and UHP checks to newer SoCs
> ARM: at91: pm: prepare for multiplatform
> ARM: at91: remove useless map_io
> ARM: at91: sama5d4: remove useless call to at91_init_sram
> ARM: at91: remove unused at91_init_sram
> ARM: at91: move at91rm9200_idle() to clk/at91/pmc.c
Okay for the whole series. I'm looking forward including the upcoming
one as well.
Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
All stacked on top of at91-3.20-cleanup.
Thanks, bye.
> arch/arm/mach-at91/Kconfig | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91rm9200.c | 15 -----
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9260.c | 27 ---------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9261.c | 9 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9263.c | 7 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9g45.c | 7 ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9n12.c | 6 --
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9rl.c | 18 ------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/at91sam9x5.c | 6 --
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-rm9200.c | 11 ++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sam9.c | 27 +++++++++
> arch/arm/mach-at91/board-dt-sama5.c | 1 +
> arch/arm/mach-at91/generic.h | 15 ++++-
> arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c | 110 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d3.c | 6 --
> arch/arm/mach-at91/sama5d4.c | 1 -
> arch/arm/mach-at91/setup.c | 20 -------
> drivers/clk/at91/pmc.c | 9 +++
> 18 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 150 deletions(-)
>
--
Nicolas Ferre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-16 17:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-15 14:59 [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2 Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] ARM: at91: pm: rework cpu detection Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 2:44 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-16 2:44 ` Yang, Wenyou
2015-01-16 10:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 10:26 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] ARM: at91: pm: use the mmio-sram pool to access SRAM Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] ARM: at91: pm: add UDP and UHP checks to newer SoCs Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] ARM: at91: pm: prepare for multiplatform Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-22 16:03 ` [PATCH] ARM: at91: fix PM initialization for newer SoCs Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:03 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:07 ` [PATCH v2] " Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-22 16:07 ` Nicolas Ferre
2015-01-23 7:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-23 7:50 ` Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
2015-01-23 10:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-23 10:11 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] ARM: at91: remove useless map_io Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] ARM: at91: sama5d4: remove useless call to at91_init_sram Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] ARM: at91: remove unused at91_init_sram Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] ARM: at91: move at91rm9200_idle() to clk/at91/pmc.c Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-15 14:59 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-01-16 17:11 ` Nicolas Ferre [this message]
2015-01-16 17:11 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] AT91 cleanup for 3.20 #2 Nicolas Ferre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=54B9463B.2020304@atmel.com \
--to=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.