From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Jeremiah Mahler" <jmmahler@gmail.com>,
"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Ander Conselvan de Oliveira" <conselvan2@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG, bisect] drm/i915: mouse pointer lags and overshoots
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150124112455.GE10113@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150124065732.GA17057@hudson.localdomain>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:57:32PM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> all,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:48:42AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:40:24AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:04:04AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:51:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > There's also an issue in (most) X drivers which exaberates this
> > > > > issues: When changing the cursor buffer the X cursor code does a a)
> > > > > disable cursor b) update cursor image c) enable cursor cycle.
> > > >
> > > > Notably not -intel on which the bug has been observed. And more
> > > > importantly, the slow downs don't seem to correlate with cursor change,
> > > > just cursor movement.
> > > > -Chris
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> > >
> > > It seems that the simple fix for this case (movement only) is to just
> > > skip the prepare_fb/cleanup_fb calls (and the associated vblank wait) in
> > > the transitional plane helper when newfb == oldfb. I just posted a
> > > small patch that makes that change (and solves the cursor lag for me).
> > >
> > > This won't solve the case if userspace uses a different framebuffer for
> > > each update (while trying to update faster than the refresh rate). Is
> > > there any existing userspace that behaves this way that we can test
> > > with?
> >
> > Hm, I've thought I've merged that patch already:
> >
> > commit ab58e3384b9f9863bfd029b458ff337d381bf6d2
> > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Date: Mon Nov 24 20:42:42 2014 +0100
> >
> > drm/atomic-helper: Skip vblank waits for unchanged fbs
> >
> > Or is the problem here that the transitional plane helpers aren't up to
> > the task? If so please reference that in your patch.
> >
> > And we still need a hack for the "changed fb cursor" issue, I'll whip
> > something up.
> > -Daniel
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
> Just checking if anyone has come up with a fix. I am still stuck at
> next-20150112 because of this bug.
I've merged a patch from Matt Roper:
commit d99b70ce7d73d78a88311453ccdd0fa0a670dd50
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Mon Jan 19 08:31:49 2015 -0800
drm/plane-helper: Skip prepare_fb/cleanup_fb when newfb==oldfb
that should rectify the sluggish i915 cursor. But it's in a separate topic
branch which isn't in linux-next. Should show up in drm-next next week
though.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
_______________________________________________
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
To: "Jeremiah Mahler" <jmmahler@gmail.com>,
"Matt Roper" <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>,
"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
"Daniel Vetter" <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
"Ville Syrjälä" <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@linux.ie>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Dave Airlie" <airlied@redhat.com>,
"Ander Conselvan de Oliveira" <conselvan2@gmail.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [BUG, bisect] drm/i915: mouse pointer lags and overshoots
Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2015 12:24:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150124112455.GE10113@phenom.ffwll.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150124065732.GA17057@hudson.localdomain>
On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 10:57:32PM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> all,
>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 06:48:42AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 08:40:24AM -0800, Matt Roper wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:04:04AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 19, 2015 at 11:51:43AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > > > There's also an issue in (most) X drivers which exaberates this
> > > > > issues: When changing the cursor buffer the X cursor code does a a)
> > > > > disable cursor b) update cursor image c) enable cursor cycle.
> > > >
> > > > Notably not -intel on which the bug has been observed. And more
> > > > importantly, the slow downs don't seem to correlate with cursor change,
> > > > just cursor movement.
> > > > -Chris
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
> > >
> > > It seems that the simple fix for this case (movement only) is to just
> > > skip the prepare_fb/cleanup_fb calls (and the associated vblank wait) in
> > > the transitional plane helper when newfb == oldfb. I just posted a
> > > small patch that makes that change (and solves the cursor lag for me).
> > >
> > > This won't solve the case if userspace uses a different framebuffer for
> > > each update (while trying to update faster than the refresh rate). Is
> > > there any existing userspace that behaves this way that we can test
> > > with?
> >
> > Hm, I've thought I've merged that patch already:
> >
> > commit ab58e3384b9f9863bfd029b458ff337d381bf6d2
> > Author: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
> > Date: Mon Nov 24 20:42:42 2014 +0100
> >
> > drm/atomic-helper: Skip vblank waits for unchanged fbs
> >
> > Or is the problem here that the transitional plane helpers aren't up to
> > the task? If so please reference that in your patch.
> >
> > And we still need a hack for the "changed fb cursor" issue, I'll whip
> > something up.
> > -Daniel
> > --
> > Daniel Vetter
> > Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
> > +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
>
> Just checking if anyone has come up with a fix. I am still stuck at
> next-20150112 because of this bug.
I've merged a patch from Matt Roper:
commit d99b70ce7d73d78a88311453ccdd0fa0a670dd50
Author: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Date: Mon Jan 19 08:31:49 2015 -0800
drm/plane-helper: Skip prepare_fb/cleanup_fb when newfb==oldfb
that should rectify the sluggish i915 cursor. But it's in a separate topic
branch which isn't in linux-next. Should show up in drm-next next week
though.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-24 11:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-17 10:06 [BUG, bisect] drm/i915: mouse pointer lags and overshoots Jeremiah Mahler
2015-01-17 10:06 ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-01-18 13:57 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2015-01-18 13:57 ` Andrey Skvortsov
2015-01-19 9:08 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-19 9:08 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-19 10:51 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-19 10:51 ` [Intel-gfx] " Daniel Vetter
2015-01-19 11:04 ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-19 11:04 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2015-01-19 16:40 ` Matt Roper
2015-01-19 16:40 ` [Intel-gfx] " Matt Roper
2015-01-19 20:43 ` Chris Wilson
2015-01-19 20:43 ` [Intel-gfx] " Chris Wilson
2015-01-20 5:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-20 5:48 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-24 6:57 ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-01-24 6:57 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jeremiah Mahler
2015-01-24 11:24 ` Daniel Vetter [this message]
2015-01-24 11:24 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-01-24 20:27 ` Jeremiah Mahler
2015-01-24 20:27 ` [Intel-gfx] " Jeremiah Mahler
2015-01-19 11:14 ` Ville Syrjälä
2015-01-19 11:14 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150124112455.GE10113@phenom.ffwll.local \
--to=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=airlied@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=conselvan2@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jmmahler@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew.d.roper@intel.com \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.