Re: [PATCH V11 00/17] Enable SRIOV on Power8

[Wei Yang <weiyang@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 05:44:42PM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>On Thu, Jan 15, 2015 at 10:27:50AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>> This patchset enables the SRIOV on POWER8.
>> 
>> The gerneral idea is put each VF into one individual PE and allocate required
>> resources like MMIO/DMA/MSI. The major difficulty comes from the MMIO
>> allocation and adjustment for PF's IOV BAR.
>> 
>> On P8, we use M64BT to cover a PF's IOV BAR, which could make an individual VF
>> sit in its own PE. This gives more flexiblity, while at the mean time it
>> brings on some restrictions on the PF's IOV BAR size and alignment.
>> 
>> To achieve this effect, we need to do some hack on pci devices's resources.
>> 1. Expand the IOV BAR properly.
>>    Done by pnv_pci_ioda_fixup_iov_resources().
>> 2. Shift the IOV BAR properly.
>>    Done by pnv_pci_vf_resource_shift().
>> 3. IOV BAR alignment is calculated by arch dependent function instead of an
>>    individual VF BAR size.
>>    Done by pnv_pcibios_sriov_resource_alignment().
>> 4. Take the IOV BAR alignment into consideration in the sizing and assigning.
>>    This is achieved by commit: "PCI: Take additional IOV BAR alignment in
>>    sizing and assigning"
>
>I was hoping to merge this during the v3.20 merge window, but that will
>likely open next week, and none of these patches have been in linux-next at
>all yet, so I think next week would be rushing it a bit.  
>
>Most of the changes are in arch/powerpc, which does help, but there are
>some changes in pci/setup-bus.c that I would like to have some runtime on.
>The changes aren't extensive, but I don't understand that code well enough
>to be comfortable based on just reading the patch.
>
>I pushed the current state of this patchset to my pci/virtualization
>branch.  I think the best way forward would be for you to start with that
>branch, since I've made quite a few tweaks to the patches you posted to the
>list.  Then you can post a v12 with any changes you make for the next
>round.

Thanks :-)

I will rebase code on pci/virtualization and do changes as you mentioned in
previous letters.

Really thanks for your review, which must take you a lot of time, especially
on the PE and M64 BAR stuff. Also thanks for you kindness and tolerance on my
mistakes in communications :-)

>
>Ben, I know you chimed in earlier to help explain PEs.  Are you or another
>powerpc maintainer planning to ack all this?
>
>Bjorn

-- 
Richard Yang
Help you, Help me