meta-networking pending patches

meta-networking pending patches

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 808 bytes --]

Hi Joe,

can you please check pending meta-networking patches?

my master-next shows:
pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe
pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi
pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.
pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10
pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files

and few more are in patchwork:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both

Thanks
-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: meta-networking pending patches

[MacDonald, Joe]

Sure thing. I'll have a look today and update the status appropriately.

-J.

On 10 Mar 2015 06:30, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Joe,

can you please check pending meta-networking patches?

my master-next shows:
pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe
pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi
pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.
pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10
pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files

and few more are in patchwork:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both

Thanks
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

Re: meta-networking pending patches

[Joe MacDonald]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2366 bytes --]

[Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.10 (Tue 13:44) MacDonald, Joe wrote:

> Sure thing. I'll have a look today and update the status appropriately.
> 
> -J.
> 
> On 10 Mar 2015 06:30, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> 
> my master-next shows:
> pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe

This has already been merged (ab75a8c8d0a57411af1452f9f8f41ccf29bb0cc7)
and I don't see it in my patchworks list now.  The filter I'm using is
this:

http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?state=1&q=meta-networking&archive=both

> pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)

I placed this one in 'rework' state on January 26th after requesting a
clarification on the bash requirement and suggesting at least one of the
patches be tweaked.

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/67476

I haven't seen a follow-up on it, but it looks like master-next has the
v3 that I commented on.

> pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe

It looks like this was merged (56e58865851a3160c49d9929011a0eccc9b0c8e2)
and I'm not seeing it in my filter.

> pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi

This was dropped in favour of the version going to meta-selinux.  I
updated patchworks to indicate it was being reworked a while back.

> pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.

I've merged this today.

> pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10

This got missed in my regular filter for obvious reasons.  I've merged
it as well.

> pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
> pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
> pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
> pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files

These were already in my queue but I've dumped them in favour of the
cherry-picks.

> and few more are in patchwork:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both

The others in this list also look like they were missed because they
didn't contain the meta-networking tag in the subject line.  Are you
manually creating that bundle or do you just have better filtering
technology than I do for catching these oddball ones?

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 501 bytes --]

Re: meta-networking pending patches

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3552 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:27:18PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> [Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.10 (Tue 13:44) MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> 
> > Sure thing. I'll have a look today and update the status appropriately.
> > 
> > -J.
> > 
> > On 10 Mar 2015 06:30, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> > 
> > can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> > 
> > my master-next shows:
> > pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
> 
> This has already been merged (ab75a8c8d0a57411af1452f9f8f41ccf29bb0cc7)
> and I don't see it in my patchworks list now.  The filter I'm using is
> this:
> 
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?state=1&q=meta-networking&archive=both

OK, master-next version was adding it to recipes-daemons instead of
recipes-protocols, that's why it wasn't resolved when rebasing
master-next. Will drop it now from master-next.

Please use meta-networking bundle as filter as well:
http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Patchwork#Multiple_layers_sharing_the_same_oe_project_on_patchwork

> > pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
> 
> I placed this one in 'rework' state on January 26th after requesting a
> clarification on the bash requirement and suggesting at least one of the
> patches be tweaked.
> 
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openembedded/67476
> 
> I haven't seen a follow-up on it, but it looks like master-next has the
> v3 that I commented on.

OK

> > pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe
> 
> It looks like this was merged (56e58865851a3160c49d9929011a0eccc9b0c8e2)
> and I'm not seeing it in my filter.

again master-next version had it in different directory
recipes-daemons and merged version is recipes-netkit, will drop it from
master-next.

> > pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi
> 
> This was dropped in favour of the version going to meta-selinux.  I
> updated patchworks to indicate it was being reworked a while back.

OK, dropping from master-next.

> > pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.
> 
> I've merged this today.

thanks

> > pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10
> 
> This got missed in my regular filter for obvious reasons.  I've merged
> it as well.

thanks

> > pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
> > pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
> > pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
> > pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files
> 
> These were already in my queue but I've dumped them in favour of the
> cherry-picks.

thanks

> > and few more are in patchwork:
> > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> 
> The others in this list also look like they were missed because they
> didn't contain the meta-networking tag in the subject line.  Are you
> manually creating that bundle or do you just have better filtering
> technology than I do for catching these oddball ones?

I'm maintaining all bundles manually

First I add to bundles based on e-mail prefix, but then when I'm reading
the commits for cherry-picking them to master-next I sometimes notice
that the patch is touching some layer without saying so in subject
prefix and I add these oddball onces to separate bundle just before
cherry-pick.

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: meta-networking pending patches

[Joe MacDonald]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2546 bytes --]

[Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.11 (Wed 13:39) Martin Jansa wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 06:27:18PM -0400, Joe MacDonald wrote:
> > [Re: [oe] meta-networking pending patches] On 15.03.10 (Tue 13:44) MacDonald, Joe wrote:
> > 
> > > Sure thing. I'll have a look today and update the status appropriately.
> > > 
> > > -J.
> > > 
> > > On 10 Mar 2015 06:30, Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Joe,
> > > 
> > > can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> > > 
> > > my master-next shows:
> > > pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
> > 
> > This has already been merged (ab75a8c8d0a57411af1452f9f8f41ccf29bb0cc7)
> > and I don't see it in my patchworks list now.  The filter I'm using is
> > this:
> > 
> > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/project/oe/list/?state=1&q=meta-networking&archive=both
> 
> OK, master-next version was adding it to recipes-daemons instead of
> recipes-protocols, that's why it wasn't resolved when rebasing
> master-next. Will drop it now from master-next.
> 
> Please use meta-networking bundle as filter as well:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> http://www.openembedded.org/wiki/Patchwork#Multiple_layers_sharing_the_same_oe_project_on_patchwork

Sure.  I'm working on reviewing the other outstanding ones now.

> > > and few more are in patchwork:
> > > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> > 
> > The others in this list also look like they were missed because they
> > didn't contain the meta-networking tag in the subject line.  Are you
> > manually creating that bundle or do you just have better filtering
> > technology than I do for catching these oddball ones?
> 
> I'm maintaining all bundles manually
> 
> First I add to bundles based on e-mail prefix, but then when I'm reading
> the commits for cherry-picking them to master-next I sometimes notice
> that the patch is touching some layer without saying so in subject
> prefix and I add these oddball onces to separate bundle just before
> cherry-pick.

Okay, good to know.  I've completely switched to using pwclient for my
workflow, but I'll try to keep on top of the outliers as well.  Unless
there's a pwclient-friendly way to work with bundles.  I haven't found
anything while poking around except some out-of-tree patches from ~6y
ago.  If you notice something lingering in the bundle, please go ahead
and ping me on it.

-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 501 bytes --]

Re: meta-networking pending patches

[Martin Jansa]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1390 bytes --]

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> Hi Joe,
> 
> can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> 
> my master-next shows:
> pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
> pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
> pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe
> pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi
> pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.
> pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10
> pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
> pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
> pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
> pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files
> 
> and few more are in patchwork:
> http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both

Another round pending in my master-next:

pick 6a89b66 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
pick 5f63e35 wolfssl: change name from cyassl to wolfssl, update to version 3.4.0
pick 446c0cf vpnc: don't rdepend on kernel-module-tun
pick e44ecd9 vsftpd / init: add LSB init infos
pick 5033f44 postfix: add LSB init infos

I plan to create "fido" branch today, so all these will need to go
through fido maintainers if you want to merge them in fido release as
well.

Regards,

-- 
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa     jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]

Re: meta-networking pending patches

[Joe MacDonald]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1981 bytes --]

Hi Martin,

[Re: meta-networking pending patches] On 15.04.13 (Mon 13:02) Martin Jansa wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 02:30:30PM +0100, Martin Jansa wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> > 
> > can you please check pending meta-networking patches?
> > 
> > my master-next shows:
> > pick e7be331 openl2tp: add new recipe
> > pick 64461e1 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
> > pick f5ba5af netkit-telnet: add new recipe
> > pick 1e6dd99 iscsi-initiator-utils: fix SELinux label for initiatorname.iscsi
> > pick 8a09ac6 vlan: install vconfig into /sbin same as Ubuntu and Fedora.
> > pick 6fdadbe stunnel: Update to version 5.10
> > pick e74b325 postfix: add link file /usr/lib/sendmail
> > pick 64de50c wireshark: update to 12.4
> > pick 4428a44 crda: move libnl, libgcrypt to DEPENDS
> > pick 5cd9417 esmtp: update sendmail link files
> > 
> > and few more are in patchwork:
> > http://patchwork.openembedded.org/bundle/jama/meta-networking/?archive=both
> 
> Another round pending in my master-next:
> 
> pick 6a89b66 ipvsadm: Add version 1.26 (initial recipe)
> pick 5f63e35 wolfssl: change name from cyassl to wolfssl, update to version 3.4.0
> pick 446c0cf vpnc: don't rdepend on kernel-module-tun
> pick e44ecd9 vsftpd / init: add LSB init infos
> pick 5033f44 postfix: add LSB init infos

Merged and the patches are updated in patchworks.  Most were simple, the
ipvsadm one had been outstanding for quite a while as I'd requested
changes in it.  I merged the patch from master-next and made the
correction myself before pushing it, since I never did see a v4 and
there wasn't an obvious update in patchworks.

> 
> I plan to create "fido" branch today, so all these will need to go
> through fido maintainers if you want to merge them in fido release as
> well.

I sent out patches tagged for-fido, since I missed the window to get
them merged prior to the branch by a few days.

-J.

> 
> Regards,
> 
-- 
-Joe MacDonald.
:wq

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]