From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: at91: force CPU selection
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 21:30:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150313203056.GL4329@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6645156.Abd4ZAJv10@wuerfel>
On 13/03/2015 at 20:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> >
> > Actually, I had a closer look today and there is already just one level
> > in my current version of patches.
> >
> > I can put everything under menuconfig ARCH_AT91 but I can't remove
> > SOC_SAM_V7 and SOC_SAM_V4_V5 because that is what is used to select
> > which dtb should be compiled.
> >
> > This would also break sama5_defconfig. This is a simple fix but that
> > means that it makes it difficult to migrate an existing .config.
> >
> > I'd say let's keep it that way as this is not broken, unless you really
> > want to see SOC_SAM_V7 and SOC_SAM_V4_V5 being removed.
> >
>
> I'm not sure what the latest version looks like, but I think it's fine
> to have SOC_SAM_V4_V5 automatically selected when CONFIG_AT91 and
> CONFIG_MULTI_V4 || CONFIG_MULTI_V5 are turned on, or selected by
> AT91SAM9 and AT91RM9200.
>
OK, I'm doing that. I'll send v3 in a few minutes.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@maxim.org.za>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: at91: force CPU selection
Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 21:30:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150313203056.GL4329@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6645156.Abd4ZAJv10@wuerfel>
On 13/03/2015 at 20:50:59 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> >
> > Actually, I had a closer look today and there is already just one level
> > in my current version of patches.
> >
> > I can put everything under menuconfig ARCH_AT91 but I can't remove
> > SOC_SAM_V7 and SOC_SAM_V4_V5 because that is what is used to select
> > which dtb should be compiled.
> >
> > This would also break sama5_defconfig. This is a simple fix but that
> > means that it makes it difficult to migrate an existing .config.
> >
> > I'd say let's keep it that way as this is not broken, unless you really
> > want to see SOC_SAM_V7 and SOC_SAM_V4_V5 being removed.
> >
>
> I'm not sure what the latest version looks like, but I think it's fine
> to have SOC_SAM_V4_V5 automatically selected when CONFIG_AT91 and
> CONFIG_MULTI_V4 || CONFIG_MULTI_V5 are turned on, or selected by
> AT91SAM9 and AT91RM9200.
>
OK, I'm doing that. I'll send v3 in a few minutes.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-13 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-10 6:59 [PATCH] ARM: at91: force CPU selection Brian Norris
2015-03-10 6:59 ` Brian Norris
2015-03-10 9:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-10 9:02 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-10 9:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-10 9:42 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-10 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-10 13:42 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-13 18:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-13 18:32 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-13 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-13 19:50 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-13 20:30 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
2015-03-13 20:30 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-10 20:02 ` Brian Norris
2015-03-10 20:02 ` Brian Norris
2015-03-10 21:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
2015-03-10 21:13 ` Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150313203056.GL4329@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.