All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org (Greg Kroah-Hartman)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:07:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a9088tam.fsf@free.fr>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> writes:
> >> > Arnd, Greg,
> >> > 
> >> >   Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
> 
> Hi Arnd and Greg,
> 
> I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. As for the reason it is extracted, see submitted
> commit [1] for reference.
> 
> The main question is : where does it belong in the kernel ?
> 
> The driver is :
>  - for the CPLDs on the Lubbock development platform, which is more or less an
>    old motherboard for Intel Xscale pxa255 SoC (see [2] for more details)
>  - these CPLDs control :
>    - interrupt muxing towards the SoC
>    - several leds
>    - switches read back
>    For the whole patch, see [4]
> 
> Lee's position is that it doesn't belong to drivers/mfd, see [3].
> 
> So where should I submit it ? And more generally, where should CPLDs drivers be
> pushed in the kernel tree ?
> 
> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.

drivers/platform/arm ?

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
	Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
	Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2015 15:07:25 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87a9088tam.fsf@free.fr>

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> writes:
> >> > Arnd, Greg,
> >> > 
> >> >   Perhaps you have some ideas WRT programmables (PLDs/CPLDs/FPGAs)?
> 
> Hi Arnd and Greg,
> 
> I have this driver I'm upstreaming, which comes out of
> arch/arm/mach-pxa/lubbock.c. As for the reason it is extracted, see submitted
> commit [1] for reference.
> 
> The main question is : where does it belong in the kernel ?
> 
> The driver is :
>  - for the CPLDs on the Lubbock development platform, which is more or less an
>    old motherboard for Intel Xscale pxa255 SoC (see [2] for more details)
>  - these CPLDs control :
>    - interrupt muxing towards the SoC
>    - several leds
>    - switches read back
>    For the whole patch, see [4]
> 
> Lee's position is that it doesn't belong to drivers/mfd, see [3].
> 
> So where should I submit it ? And more generally, where should CPLDs drivers be
> pushed in the kernel tree ?
> 
> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.

drivers/platform/arm ?

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-03-25 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-24 15:05 [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-cplds binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-16 13:05   ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 13:05     ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 13:05     ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 13:27     ` robert.jarzmik at free.fr
2015-02-16 13:27       ` robert.jarzmik
2015-02-16 16:27       ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 16:27         ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 22:14         ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-16 22:14           ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-17  7:43           ` Lee Jones
2015-02-17  7:43             ` Lee Jones
2015-02-17 17:38             ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-17 17:38               ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-18  8:07               ` Lee Jones
2015-02-18  8:07                 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-20 16:02                 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-20 16:02                   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28  9:57                   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28  9:57                     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28 15:11                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-28 15:11                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-28 15:29                       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28 15:29                         ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-25 14:07                   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2015-03-25 14:07                     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-26 21:38                     ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-26 21:38                       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-26 21:38                       ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-26 23:47                       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-26 23:47                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-28  2:35                       ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28  2:35                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28  8:29                         ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-28  8:29                           ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-28 13:24                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28 13:24                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28 13:24                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: pxa: lubbock: use new lubbock_cplds driver Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add entry for lubbock-cplds Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-10 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-cplds binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-10 18:41   ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-10 18:41   ` Robert Jarzmik

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150325140725.GA11499@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.