From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 03:35:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201503280335.16280.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871tkbxwup.fsf@free.fr>
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
> >
> > drivers/platform/arm ?
> Most certainly.
>
> I'll submit that to drivers/platform/arm/pxa, and maintain that pxa tree. As for
> drivers/platform/arm, do you want also maintainers to step up, or will you take
> the review/merge burden ?
>
I'd much prefer not to add drivers/platform/arm, which would make it too easy
to add random stuff there. What is the problem with leaving it in mach-pxa?
Arnd
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@free.fr>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@linaro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@hellion.org.uk>,
Kumar Gala <galak@codeaurora.org>,
Daniel Mack <daniel@zonque.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@gmail.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board
Date: Sat, 28 Mar 2015 03:35:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201503280335.16280.arnd@arndb.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871tkbxwup.fsf@free.fr>
On Thursday 26 March 2015, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
>
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 05:02:57PM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> >> If there is no solution, I'll fallback through arch/arm/plat-pxa, not very nice,
> >> but it has to land somewhere, I don't want lubbock to remain broken.
> >
> > drivers/platform/arm ?
> Most certainly.
>
> I'll submit that to drivers/platform/arm/pxa, and maintain that pxa tree. As for
> drivers/platform/arm, do you want also maintainers to step up, or will you take
> the review/merge burden ?
>
I'd much prefer not to add drivers/platform/arm, which would make it too easy
to add random stuff there. What is the problem with leaving it in mach-pxa?
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-28 2:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-24 15:05 [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-cplds binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v4 2/4] mfd: lubbock_cplds: add lubbock IO board Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-16 13:05 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 13:05 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 13:05 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 13:27 ` robert.jarzmik at free.fr
2015-02-16 13:27 ` robert.jarzmik
2015-02-16 16:27 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 16:27 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-16 22:14 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-16 22:14 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-17 7:43 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-17 7:43 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-17 17:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-17 17:38 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-02-18 8:07 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-18 8:07 ` Lee Jones
2015-02-20 16:02 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-20 16:02 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28 9:57 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28 9:57 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28 15:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-28 15:11 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-02-28 15:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-28 15:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-25 14:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-25 14:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-26 21:38 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-26 21:38 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-26 21:38 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-26 23:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-26 23:47 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2015-03-28 2:35 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2015-03-28 2:35 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28 8:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-28 8:29 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-03-28 13:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28 13:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-03-28 13:24 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-01-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v4 3/4] ARM: pxa: lubbock: use new lubbock_cplds driver Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] MAINTAINERS: add entry for lubbock-cplds Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-01-24 15:05 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-10 18:41 ` [PATCH v4 1/4] dt-bindings: mfd: add lubbock-cplds binding Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-10 18:41 ` Robert Jarzmik
2015-02-10 18:41 ` Robert Jarzmik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201503280335.16280.arnd@arndb.de \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.