[U-Boot] [RESEND PATCH 5/6] usb: host: Add ehci-vf USB driver for ARM Vybrid SoC's

[Marek Vasut <marex@denx.de>]

On Thursday, April 09, 2015 at 07:05:15 PM, maitysanchayan at gmail.com wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On 15-04-09 18:09:46, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Tuesday, April 07, 2015 at 09:03:45 AM, maitysanchayan at gmail.com wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > 
> > > On 15-04-01 21:15:21, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, April 01, 2015 at 11:54:22 AM, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > The commit message is missing, please fix in v2.
> > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Sanchayan Maity <maitysanchayan@gmail.com>
> > > > 
> > > > [...]
> > > > 
> > > > > +#define USB_NC_REG_OFFSET				0x00000800
> > > > > +#define USBCx_CTRL_OFFSET				0x00000000
> > > > > +#define USBCx_PHY_CTRL_OFFSET			0x00000018
> > > > 
> > > > Please define the register offsets using the regular struct {}
> > > > method, see for example struct mxs_usbphy_regs and it's usage in
> > > > ehci-mxs.c .
> > > 
> > > I had a query here, just to be sure and avoid rework. The vybrid
> > > defines would be similar to mxs. I assume I can add them to the
> > > regs-common.h file along with a note that the VF610 also has the same
> > > _set, _clr, _tog register? Or perhaps it would be more appropriate to
> > > have the file have generic names which mxs, vf and imx can all
> > > leverage? Though for now this would require reworking all the three
> > > drivers.
> > > 
> > > The USB phy definitions part is ok, as they would go in the arch
> > > specific folder.
> > 
> > If these are really IMX/MXS/VF specific, then the defines should go into
> > arch/arm/include/asm/imx-common/ . Otherwise, you can make chipidea
> > specific file in include/usb/ .
> 
> Not really much VF specific. I was not sure about using the mxs_ prefix
> accessors for VF as well. In the end I found usage in one iMX6 file and
> decided that it makes better sense to actually use the mxs_ existing
> defines. They can be used for Vybrid as well. Except for the non core
> regsiters and a few others no other difference.
> 
> I send a v2 version of the patchset based taking your suggestion into
> account. The driver looks cleaner in comparison to the previous :)
> IMHO. Thanks.
> 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/u-boot at lists.denx.de/msg168727.html

Roger. If you drop the MXS prefix, feel free to do that in a separate
patch, so this set can go in first :)