All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Anssi Hannula <anssi.hannula@iki.fi>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, Michael Halcrow <mhalcrow@google.com>
Subject: Re: ext4 crypto: Do not select from EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION
Date: Sun, 3 May 2015 13:53:20 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150503175320.GI10014@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <554615C6.1060107@iki.fi>

On Sun, May 03, 2015 at 03:34:14PM +0300, Anssi Hannula wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 01.05.2015, 03:18, Herbert Xu kirjoitti:
> > This patch adds a tristate EXT4_ENCRYPTION to do the selections
> > for EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION because selecting from a bool causes all
> > the selected options to be built-in, even if EXT4 itself is a
> > module.
> 
> Hmm, are you sure?
> 
> Since CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION itself depends on CONFIG_EXT4_FS, the
> selector for the selected options becomes (CONFIG_EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION &&
> CONFIG_EXT4_FS && CONFIG_BLOCK).
> 
> Per my testing on git master (without this patch), if EXT4_FS=m and
> EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION=y, both "built-in" and "module" options are allowed
> for the selected options (checked CONFIG_ENCRYPTED_KEYS myself).

I believe the situation which is causing concern is when someone wants
to build a kernel where EXT4_FS=y, but they want the cryptographic
algorithms to be modules.  In that case, since EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION is
'y', it forces the all of the crypto modules to be built into the
kernel, and so it forecloses that option from someone who is building
or packaging a kernel.

	       		   	     - Ted

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-03 17:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-01  0:18 ext4 crypto: Do not select from EXT4_FS_ENCRYPTION Herbert Xu
2015-05-02 13:40 ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-05-03 12:34 ` Anssi Hannula
2015-05-03 17:53   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2015-05-03 18:29     ` Anssi Hannula
2015-05-03 21:11       ` Theodore Ts'o
2015-05-04  1:00         ` Herbert Xu
2015-05-04  1:37           ` Theodore Ts'o

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150503175320.GI10014@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=anssi.hannula@iki.fi \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhalcrow@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.