All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 07:43:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505144308.GA21061@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2213391.JZ0TJA9KXB@wuerfel>

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [150505 03:56]:
> On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > 
> > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still
> > have the following board-*.c files:
> > 
> > BOARD                   REASON NEEDED
> > board-ldp.c             Still used in RMKs boot test system
> > board-omap3logic.c      Getting a .dts file for v4.2
> > board-omap3pandora.c    Got a .dts file for v4.1
> > board-rx51-*.c          Needs /proc/atags support for user space
> > 
> > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep
> > the platform data around for one more merge window in case of
> > reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4
> > if no issues needing reverting are found.
> 
> Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the
> rx51 /proc/atags support?

I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for device tree
based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more
info on that.

Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are
still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT:
Add support for Revision":

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 07:43:08 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505144308.GA21061@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2213391.JZ0TJA9KXB@wuerfel>

* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [150505 03:56]:
> On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > 
> > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still
> > have the following board-*.c files:
> > 
> > BOARD                   REASON NEEDED
> > board-ldp.c             Still used in RMKs boot test system
> > board-omap3logic.c      Getting a .dts file for v4.2
> > board-omap3pandora.c    Got a .dts file for v4.1
> > board-rx51-*.c          Needs /proc/atags support for user space
> > 
> > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep
> > the platform data around for one more merge window in case of
> > reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4
> > if no issues needing reverting are found.
> 
> Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the
> rx51 /proc/atags support?

I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for device tree
based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more
info on that.

Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are
still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT:
Add support for Revision":

http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-05 14:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-04 20:01 [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2 Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for cm-t35 Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Overo Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06 16:14   ` Ash Charles
2015-05-06 16:14     ` Ash Charles
2015-05-04 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Beagleboards Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 10:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2 Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-05 10:54   ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-05 14:43   ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-05-05 14:43     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 14:54     ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 14:54       ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 15:06       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 15:06         ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 16:39         ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 16:39           ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 16:58           ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-05 16:58             ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-05 17:00           ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 17:00             ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06  8:52             ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-06  8:52               ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-06 14:42               ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06 14:42                 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-15 19:52                 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-15 19:52                   ` Pali Rohár

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150505144308.GA21061@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.