From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 16:54:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505145407.GK18002@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150505144308.GA21061@atomide.com>
On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [150505 03:56]:
> > On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still
> > > have the following board-*.c files:
> > >
> > > BOARD REASON NEEDED
> > > board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test system
> > > board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file for v4.2
> > > board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for v4.1
> > > board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags support for user space
> > >
> > > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep
> > > the platform data around for one more merge window in case of
> > > reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4
> > > if no issues needing reverting are found.
> >
> > Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the
> > rx51 /proc/atags support?
>
> I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for device tree
> based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more
> info on that.
>
> Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are
> still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT:
> Add support for Revision":
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not check if
you merged them or not. I did not get any new comments for them for a
while and right now I do not have time for looking at it again.
I'm against removing board-rx51*.c files before /proc/cpuinfo and
/proc/atags will be available also for DT booted machine...
Plus there were some other regression for DT booted N900 (not only /proc
files), but I do not remember them now. I sent more emails where I
wrote it. Maybe it is fixed, maybe not, just search into archive for my
emails.
I can try to find some time at the weekend (this or next) to test
4.1-rc* kernel on N900 and report what is working...
Thanks!
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: pali.rohar@gmail.com (Pali Rohár)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2
Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 16:54:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150505145407.GK18002@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150505144308.GA21061@atomide.com>
On Tuesday 05 May 2015 07:43:08 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [150505 03:56]:
> > On Monday 04 May 2015 13:01:54 Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > >
> > > For dropping the remaining omap3 legacy boot support, we still
> > > have the following board-*.c files:
> > >
> > > BOARD REASON NEEDED
> > > board-ldp.c Still used in RMKs boot test system
> > > board-omap3logic.c Getting a .dts file for v4.2
> > > board-omap3pandora.c Got a .dts file for v4.1
> > > board-rx51-*.c Needs /proc/atags support for user space
> > >
> > > I'm hoping we can drop those for v4.3 merge window, then keep
> > > the platform data around for one more merge window in case of
> > > reverting needed, then drop the platform data too for v4.4
> > > if no issues needing reverting are found.
> >
> > Sounds great. Has there been a conclusion about what to do for the
> > rx51 /proc/atags support?
>
> I believe we just need to enable /proc/atags also for device tree
> based booting if CONFIG_ARM_ATAG_DTB_COMPAT. Pali may have more
> info on that.
>
> Then looks like Pali's two patches for showing the revision are
> still pending in thread "[PATCH v2 0/2] ARM: /proc/cpuinfo: DT:
> Add support for Revision":
>
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg401535.html
>
> Regards,
>
> Tony
I think I already sent all need patches to ML. But I did not check if
you merged them or not. I did not get any new comments for them for a
while and right now I do not have time for looking at it again.
I'm against removing board-rx51*.c files before /proc/cpuinfo and
/proc/atags will be available also for DT booted machine...
Plus there were some other regression for DT booted N900 (not only /proc
files), but I do not remember them now. I sent more emails where I
wrote it. Maybe it is fixed, maybe not, just search into archive for my
emails.
I can try to find some time at the weekend (this or next) to test
4.1-rc* kernel on N900 and report what is working...
Thanks!
--
Pali Roh?r
pali.rohar at gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-05 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-04 20:01 [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2 Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` [PATCH 1/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for cm-t35 Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` [PATCH 2/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Overo Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06 16:14 ` Ash Charles
2015-05-06 16:14 ` Ash Charles
2015-05-04 20:01 ` [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Remove legacy booting support for Beagleboards Tony Lindgren
2015-05-04 20:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 10:54 ` [PATCH 0/3] Drop more omap3 legacy board-*.c files for v4.2 Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-05 10:54 ` Arnd Bergmann
2015-05-05 14:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 14:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 14:54 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
2015-05-05 14:54 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 15:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 15:06 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 16:39 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 16:39 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-05 16:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-05 16:58 ` Nicolas Pitre
2015-05-05 17:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-05 17:00 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06 8:52 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-06 8:52 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-06 14:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-06 14:42 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-05-15 19:52 ` Pali Rohár
2015-05-15 19:52 ` Pali Rohár
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150505145407.GK18002@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.