From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
rob.herring@linaro.org, arnd.bergmann@linaro.org,
broonie@kernel.org, mike.turquette@linaro.org,
sboyd@codeaurora.org, linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@linaro.org,
olof@lixom.net, Sudeep.Holla@arm.com, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org, l.stach@pengutronix.de,
thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, ta.omasab@gmail.com,
kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com, khilman@linaro.org,
santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:44:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150526051409.GI23464@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555D6CC8.9050201@ti.com>
On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> I would suggest adding a link to how future vendor specific extension
> docs might look like - maybe this is probably not the time to discuss
> this.. but anyways.. we could make some statement to the effect of "SoC
> vendor specfic extensions are documented as
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/<vendor>,opp.txt and should
> clearly indicate that the extensions are permitted only under the
> operating-points-v2 compatible description."
Will this work ?:
If required, this can be extended for SoC vendor specfic bindings. Such bindings
should be documented as Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/<vendor>-opp.txt
and should have a compatible description like: "operating-points-v2-<vendor>".
--
viresh
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings
Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 10:44:09 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150526051409.GI23464@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555D6CC8.9050201@ti.com>
On 21-05-15, 00:27, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> I would suggest adding a link to how future vendor specific extension
> docs might look like - maybe this is probably not the time to discuss
> this.. but anyways.. we could make some statement to the effect of "SoC
> vendor specfic extensions are documented as
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/<vendor>,opp.txt and should
> clearly indicate that the extensions are permitted only under the
> operating-points-v2 compatible description."
Will this work ?:
If required, this can be extended for SoC vendor specfic bindings. Such bindings
should be documented as Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/<vendor>-opp.txt
and should have a compatible description like: "operating-points-v2-<vendor>".
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-26 5:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-20 3:41 [PATCH V5 0/3] OPP: Introduce OPP (V2) bindings Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` [PATCH V5 1/3] OPP: Redefine bindings to overcome shortcomings Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 13:27 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-20 13:27 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqKR0-TcBjCnoaLBR9M2wGHCOuO2KSyL+4U+dpTvHGzubQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-20 13:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 13:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:27 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:27 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:46 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:58 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:58 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 6:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 6:06 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-22 15:55 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-22 15:55 ` Rob Herring
[not found] ` <CAL_JsqKhpyLgh5_1jZ_u0OP7=Piw=pgqZdQJ0K4Rm7DQ5ve+gA-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-05-26 5:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-26 5:20 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-26 5:14 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-05-26 5:14 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` [PATCH V5 2/3] OPP: Allow multiple OPP tables to be passed via DT Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:34 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:34 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:50 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-26 4:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-26 4:51 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` [PATCH V5 3/3] OPP: Add binding for 'opp-suspend' Viresh Kumar
2015-05-20 3:41 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:32 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:32 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 5:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 5:49 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-05-21 6:04 ` Nishanth Menon
2015-05-21 6:04 ` Nishanth Menon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150526051409.GI23464@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=Sudeep.Holla@arm.com \
--cc=arnd.bergmann@linaro.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=kesavan.abhilash@gmail.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.turquette@linaro.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rob.herring@linaro.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@oracle.com \
--cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=ta.omasab@gmail.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=viswanath.puttagunta@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.