All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix sparse warning for lock
Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:34:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150805223455.GD5180@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438781204-13283-1-git-send-email-van.freenix@gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:26:44PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Use __acquire() and __release() in the right place to silence the sparse
> lock checking warning.
> 
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:177:13: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_fillrect' - different lock contexts for basic block
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:243:9: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_copyarea' - different lock contexts for basic block
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:247:13: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_imageblit' - different lock contexts for basic block
> 

Sparse is really bad at locking stuff.  Smatch is also really bad for
locking and I have been promising to re-write that check for years, but
I take comfort always in the fact that at least it's not as bad as
Sparse.

You should pretty much ignore Sparse locking warnings.

regards,
dan carpenter


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Peng Fan <van.freenix@gmail.com>
Cc: sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com, teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix sparse warning for lock
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 01:34:55 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150805223455.GD5180@mwanda> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438781204-13283-1-git-send-email-van.freenix@gmail.com>

On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 09:26:44PM +0800, Peng Fan wrote:
> Use __acquire() and __release() in the right place to silence the sparse
> lock checking warning.
> 
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:177:13: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_fillrect' - different lock contexts for basic block
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:243:9: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_copyarea' - different lock contexts for basic block
> drivers/staging/sm750fb/sm750.c:247:13: warning: context imbalance in 'lynxfb_ops_imageblit' - different lock contexts for basic block
> 

Sparse is really bad at locking stuff.  Smatch is also really bad for
locking and I have been promising to re-write that check for years, but
I take comfort always in the fact that at least it's not as bad as
Sparse.

You should pretty much ignore Sparse locking warnings.

regards,
dan carpenter


  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-05 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-03-09 20:57 [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: Fix sparse warning Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-09 20:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-10  7:00 ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-10  7:00   ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-10  8:47   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-10  8:59     ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-10  8:59       ` Dan Carpenter
2015-03-10  9:14       ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-03-10  7:42 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-10  7:54   ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-03-10  8:44   ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2015-08-05 13:26 ` [PATCH] staging: sm750fb: fix sparse warning for lock Peng Fan
2015-08-05 13:26   ` Peng Fan
2015-08-05 19:01   ` Greg KH
2015-08-05 19:01     ` Greg KH
2015-08-05 22:34   ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2015-08-05 22:34     ` Dan Carpenter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150805223455.GD5180@mwanda \
    --to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
    --cc=teddy.wang@siliconmotion.com \
    --cc=van.freenix@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.