All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: tj@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	jack@suse.cz, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression]
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:44:35 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150813004435.GN3902@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150812101204.GE17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>

[cc linux-fsdevel because it looks like a sync regression in the
generic writeback code.  Also, not trimming away original email so
people can read it in full. ]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:12:04PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've been seeing generic/04[89] fails on XFS since 4.2-rc1 from time to
> time, but the failure isn't reproduced on every test host. Recently I
> finally got a host that could reproduce the failure reliably.
> 
> It's a regression since 4.1 kernel based on my tests, 4.1 kernel passed
> the tests and the failures showed up starting from 4.2-rc1.

I've seen this failure twice on one of my 1p/1GB RAM VMs in the past
couple of weeks running 4.2-rc4 and 4.2-rc6, but I haven't been able
to reproduce it reliably (2 failures in ~50 runs on the VM) so
haven't been able to track down the cause.  I even thought yesterday
I should ask and see if anyone else is seeing this test fail
occasionally, but then shit happened around here....

It might be a couple of days before I really get a chance to dig
into this, so it might be best if Tejun can look into it first.

Cheers,

Dave.

> What xfstests generic/04[89] test is
> 
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 xfstests]# ./lsqa.pl tests/generic/04[89]
> FSQA Test No. 048
> 
> Test for NULL files problem
> test inode size is on disk after sync
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> FSQA Test No. 049
> 
> Test for NULL files problem
> test inode size is on disk after sync - expose log replay bug
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> And the failure is like (test files have zero size)
> 
> root@dhcp-66-86-11 xfstests]# ./check generic/048
> FSTYP         -- xfs (non-debug)
> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 dhcp-66-86-11 4.2.0-rc5
> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda6
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sda6 /mnt/testarea/scratch
> 
> generic/048 28s ... - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//generic/048.out.bad)
>     --- tests/generic/048.out   2015-07-16 17:28:15.800000000 +0800
>     +++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/048.out.bad     2015-08-12 18:04:52.923000000 +0800
>     @@ -1 +1,32 @@
>      QA output created by 048
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/969 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/970 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/971 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/972 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/973 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/974 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     ...
> 
> 
> And I bisected to the following commit
> 
> commit e79729123f6392b36450113c6c52074b7d389c85
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date:   Fri May 22 17:13:48 2015 -0400
> 
>     writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean
>     
>     There are several places in fs/fs-writeback.c which queues
>     wb_writeback_work without checking whether the target wb
>     (bdi_writeback) has dirty inodes or not.  The only thing
>     wb_writeback_work does is writing back the dirty inodes for the target
>     wb and queueing a work item for a clean wb is essentially noop.  There
>     are some side effects such as bandwidth stats being updated and
>     triggering tracepoints but these don't affect the operation in any
>     meaningful way.
>     
>     This patch makes all writeback_inodes_sb_nr() and sync_inodes_sb()
>     skip wb_queue_work() if the target bdi is clean.  Also, it moves
>     dirtiness check from wakeup_flusher_threads() to
>     __wb_start_writeback() so that all its callers benefit from the check.
>     
>     While the overhead incurred by scheduling a noop work isn't currently
>     significant, the overhead may be higher with cgroup writeback support
>     as we may end up issuing noop work items to a lot of clean wb's.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>     Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>     Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>     Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
> 
> 
> Attachments are my xfstests config file and host info requested by
> http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F
> 
> If you need more info please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eryu

> It's a RHEL7 kvm guest running on RHEL6.6 with 8G mem and 4 vcpus.
> 
> The disk configuration in guest xml is
> 
> <disk type='file' device='disk'>
>       <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/>
>       <source file='/home/osimage/rhel7.img'/>
>       <target dev='hda' bus='ide'/>
>       <alias name='ide0-0-0'/>
>       <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/>
> </disk>
> 
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# grep -c proc /proc/cpuinfo
> 4
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:        7912932 kB
> MemFree:         7547480 kB
> MemAvailable:    7599440 kB
> Buffers:             944 kB
> Cached:           219292 kB
> SwapCached:            0 kB
> Active:           170072 kB
> Inactive:         106352 kB
> Active(anon):      56476 kB
> Inactive(anon):     8384 kB
> Active(file):     113596 kB
> Inactive(file):    97968 kB
> Unevictable:           0 kB
> Mlocked:               0 kB
> SwapTotal:       8257532 kB
> SwapFree:        8257532 kB
> Dirty:             42556 kB
> Writeback:             0 kB
> AnonPages:         56020 kB
> Mapped:            33008 kB
> Shmem:              8552 kB
> Slab:              42520 kB
> SReclaimable:      18648 kB
> SUnreclaim:        23872 kB
> KernelStack:        2336 kB
> PageTables:         3280 kB
> NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
> Bounce:                0 kB
> WritebackTmp:          0 kB
> CommitLimit:    12213996 kB
> Committed_AS:     260636 kB
> VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
> VmallocUsed:       26336 kB
> VmallocChunk:   34359623680 kB
> HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
> AnonHugePages:     12288 kB
> HugePages_Total:       0
> HugePages_Free:        0
> HugePages_Rsvd:        0
> HugePages_Surp:        0
> Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
> DirectMap4k:       69620 kB
> DirectMap2M:     8318976 kB
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# cat /proc/mounts
> proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> sysfs /sys sysfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> devtmpfs /dev devtmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,size=3943408k,nr_inodes=985852,mode=755 0 0
> securityfs /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev 0 0
> devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,seclabel,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0
> tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,mode=755 0 0
> tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd 0 0
> pstore /sys/fs/pstore pstore rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/memory cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,memory 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/devices cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,perf_event 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/hugetlb cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,hugetlb 0 0
> configfs /sys/kernel/config configfs rw,relatime 0 0
> /dev/sda3 / xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> selinuxfs /sys/fs/selinux selinuxfs rw,relatime 0 0
> systemd-1 /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc autofs rw,relatime,fd=34,pgrp=1,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct 0 0
> debugfs /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> hugetlbfs /dev/hugepages hugetlbfs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> mqueue /dev/mqueue mqueue rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> /dev/sda1 /boot xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> /dev/sda6 /mnt/testarea/scratch xfs rw,context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> /dev/sda5 /mnt/testarea/test xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# cat /proc/partitions
> major minor  #blocks  name
> 
>    8        0  314572800 sda
>    8        1     512000 sda1
>    8        2    8257536 sda2
>    8        3   52428800 sda3
>    8        4          1 sda4
>    8        5   15728640 sda5
>    8        6   15728640 sda6
>    8        7   15728640 sda7
>    8        8   15728640 sda8
>    8        9   15728640 sda9
>    8       10   15728640 sda10
>    8       11   15728640 sda11
>    8       16  104857600 sdb
>    8       17  104856576 sdb1
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# lvs
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]#

> TEST_DEV=/dev/sda5
> TEST_DIR=/mnt/testarea/test				# mount point of TEST PARTITION
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/testarea/scratch			# mount point for SCRATCH PARTITION
> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda6

> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, tj@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, jack@suse.cz,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression]
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 10:44:35 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150813004435.GN3902@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150812101204.GE17933@dhcp-13-216.nay.redhat.com>

[cc linux-fsdevel because it looks like a sync regression in the
generic writeback code.  Also, not trimming away original email so
people can read it in full. ]

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 06:12:04PM +0800, Eryu Guan wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've been seeing generic/04[89] fails on XFS since 4.2-rc1 from time to
> time, but the failure isn't reproduced on every test host. Recently I
> finally got a host that could reproduce the failure reliably.
> 
> It's a regression since 4.1 kernel based on my tests, 4.1 kernel passed
> the tests and the failures showed up starting from 4.2-rc1.

I've seen this failure twice on one of my 1p/1GB RAM VMs in the past
couple of weeks running 4.2-rc4 and 4.2-rc6, but I haven't been able
to reproduce it reliably (2 failures in ~50 runs on the VM) so
haven't been able to track down the cause.  I even thought yesterday
I should ask and see if anyone else is seeing this test fail
occasionally, but then shit happened around here....

It might be a couple of days before I really get a chance to dig
into this, so it might be best if Tejun can look into it first.

Cheers,

Dave.

> What xfstests generic/04[89] test is
> 
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 xfstests]# ./lsqa.pl tests/generic/04[89]
> FSQA Test No. 048
> 
> Test for NULL files problem
> test inode size is on disk after sync
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> FSQA Test No. 049
> 
> Test for NULL files problem
> test inode size is on disk after sync - expose log replay bug
> 
> --------------------------------------------------
> 
> And the failure is like (test files have zero size)
> 
> root@dhcp-66-86-11 xfstests]# ./check generic/048
> FSTYP         -- xfs (non-debug)
> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 dhcp-66-86-11 4.2.0-rc5
> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sda6
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- -o context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0 /dev/sda6 /mnt/testarea/scratch
> 
> generic/048 28s ... - output mismatch (see /root/xfstests/results//generic/048.out.bad)
>     --- tests/generic/048.out   2015-07-16 17:28:15.800000000 +0800
>     +++ /root/xfstests/results//generic/048.out.bad     2015-08-12 18:04:52.923000000 +0800
>     @@ -1 +1,32 @@
>      QA output created by 048
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/969 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/970 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/971 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/972 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/973 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     +file /mnt/testarea/scratch/974 has incorrect size - sync failed
>     ...
> 
> 
> And I bisected to the following commit
> 
> commit e79729123f6392b36450113c6c52074b7d389c85
> Author: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
> Date:   Fri May 22 17:13:48 2015 -0400
> 
>     writeback: don't issue wb_writeback_work if clean
>     
>     There are several places in fs/fs-writeback.c which queues
>     wb_writeback_work without checking whether the target wb
>     (bdi_writeback) has dirty inodes or not.  The only thing
>     wb_writeback_work does is writing back the dirty inodes for the target
>     wb and queueing a work item for a clean wb is essentially noop.  There
>     are some side effects such as bandwidth stats being updated and
>     triggering tracepoints but these don't affect the operation in any
>     meaningful way.
>     
>     This patch makes all writeback_inodes_sb_nr() and sync_inodes_sb()
>     skip wb_queue_work() if the target bdi is clean.  Also, it moves
>     dirtiness check from wakeup_flusher_threads() to
>     __wb_start_writeback() so that all its callers benefit from the check.
>     
>     While the overhead incurred by scheduling a noop work isn't currently
>     significant, the overhead may be higher with cgroup writeback support
>     as we may end up issuing noop work items to a lot of clean wb's.
>     
>     Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>     Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
>     Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
>     Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
> 
> 
> Attachments are my xfstests config file and host info requested by
> http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F
> 
> If you need more info please let me know.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eryu

> It's a RHEL7 kvm guest running on RHEL6.6 with 8G mem and 4 vcpus.
> 
> The disk configuration in guest xml is
> 
> <disk type='file' device='disk'>
>       <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none'/>
>       <source file='/home/osimage/rhel7.img'/>
>       <target dev='hda' bus='ide'/>
>       <alias name='ide0-0-0'/>
>       <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/>
> </disk>
> 
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# grep -c proc /proc/cpuinfo
> 4
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# cat /proc/meminfo
> MemTotal:        7912932 kB
> MemFree:         7547480 kB
> MemAvailable:    7599440 kB
> Buffers:             944 kB
> Cached:           219292 kB
> SwapCached:            0 kB
> Active:           170072 kB
> Inactive:         106352 kB
> Active(anon):      56476 kB
> Inactive(anon):     8384 kB
> Active(file):     113596 kB
> Inactive(file):    97968 kB
> Unevictable:           0 kB
> Mlocked:               0 kB
> SwapTotal:       8257532 kB
> SwapFree:        8257532 kB
> Dirty:             42556 kB
> Writeback:             0 kB
> AnonPages:         56020 kB
> Mapped:            33008 kB
> Shmem:              8552 kB
> Slab:              42520 kB
> SReclaimable:      18648 kB
> SUnreclaim:        23872 kB
> KernelStack:        2336 kB
> PageTables:         3280 kB
> NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
> Bounce:                0 kB
> WritebackTmp:          0 kB
> CommitLimit:    12213996 kB
> Committed_AS:     260636 kB
> VmallocTotal:   34359738367 kB
> VmallocUsed:       26336 kB
> VmallocChunk:   34359623680 kB
> HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
> AnonHugePages:     12288 kB
> HugePages_Total:       0
> HugePages_Free:        0
> HugePages_Rsvd:        0
> HugePages_Surp:        0
> Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
> DirectMap4k:       69620 kB
> DirectMap2M:     8318976 kB
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# cat /proc/mounts
> proc /proc proc rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> sysfs /sys sysfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> devtmpfs /dev devtmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,size=3943408k,nr_inodes=985852,mode=755 0 0
> securityfs /sys/kernel/security securityfs rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> tmpfs /dev/shm tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev 0 0
> devpts /dev/pts devpts rw,seclabel,nosuid,noexec,relatime,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 0 0
> tmpfs /run tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,mode=755 0 0
> tmpfs /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,mode=755 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/systemd cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,xattr,release_agent=/usr/lib/systemd/systemd-cgroups-agent,name=systemd 0 0
> pstore /sys/fs/pstore pstore rw,seclabel,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpuset cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpuset 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/cpu,cpuacct cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,cpu,cpuacct 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/blkio cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,blkio 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/memory cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,memory 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/devices cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,devices 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/freezer cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,freezer 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/net_cls cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,net_cls 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/perf_event cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,perf_event 0 0
> cgroup /sys/fs/cgroup/hugetlb cgroup rw,nosuid,nodev,noexec,relatime,hugetlb 0 0
> configfs /sys/kernel/config configfs rw,relatime 0 0
> /dev/sda3 / xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> selinuxfs /sys/fs/selinux selinuxfs rw,relatime 0 0
> systemd-1 /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc autofs rw,relatime,fd=34,pgrp=1,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct 0 0
> debugfs /sys/kernel/debug debugfs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> hugetlbfs /dev/hugepages hugetlbfs rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> mqueue /dev/mqueue mqueue rw,seclabel,relatime 0 0
> /dev/sda1 /boot xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> /dev/sda6 /mnt/testarea/scratch xfs rw,context=system_u:object_r:nfs_t:s0,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> /dev/sda5 /mnt/testarea/test xfs rw,seclabel,relatime,attr2,inode64,noquota 0 0
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# cat /proc/partitions
> major minor  #blocks  name
> 
>    8        0  314572800 sda
>    8        1     512000 sda1
>    8        2    8257536 sda2
>    8        3   52428800 sda3
>    8        4          1 sda4
>    8        5   15728640 sda5
>    8        6   15728640 sda6
>    8        7   15728640 sda7
>    8        8   15728640 sda8
>    8        9   15728640 sda9
>    8       10   15728640 sda10
>    8       11   15728640 sda11
>    8       16  104857600 sdb
>    8       17  104856576 sdb1
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]# lvs
> [root@dhcp-66-86-11 ~]#

> TEST_DEV=/dev/sda5
> TEST_DIR=/mnt/testarea/test				# mount point of TEST PARTITION
> SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/testarea/scratch			# mount point for SCRATCH PARTITION
> SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/sda6

> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@oss.sgi.com
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs


-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-08-13  0:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 94+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-12 10:12 generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code Eryu Guan
2015-08-12 10:27 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-13  0:44 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-13  0:44   ` generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Dave Chinner
2015-08-13 15:34   ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 15:34     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 19:16     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 22:44   ` [PATCH block/for-linus] writeback: fix syncing of I_DIRTY_TIME inodes Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 22:44     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-14 11:14     ` Jan Kara
2015-08-14 11:14       ` Jan Kara
2015-08-14 15:14       ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-14 15:14         ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-17 20:00         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-17 20:00           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18  5:33           ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-18  5:33             ` Damien Wyart
2015-08-17 20:02       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-17 20:02         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18  9:16         ` Jan Kara
2015-08-18  9:16           ` Jan Kara
2015-08-18 17:47           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 17:47             ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 19:54             ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 19:54               ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18 21:56               ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-18 21:56                 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-20  6:12                 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20  6:12                   ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:01                   ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:36                   ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:36                     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:37                     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 14:37                       ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-20 16:55                       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-20 16:55                         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-20 23:04                         ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-20 23:04                           ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 18:10                           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 18:10                             ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:27                             ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 22:27                               ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 22:53                               ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:53                                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-21 10:20                 ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-21 10:20                   ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-22  0:30                   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-22  0:30                     ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-22  4:46                     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-22  4:46                       ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  1:11                       ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  1:11                         ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  3:18                         ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  3:18                           ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  6:24                           ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  6:24                             ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  8:34                             ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  8:34                               ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-24  8:55                               ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  8:55                                 ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24  9:19                             ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24  9:19                               ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 14:51                               ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 14:51                                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 17:11                                 ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 17:11                                   ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 19:08                                   ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 19:08                                     ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 19:32                                     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 19:32                                       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 21:09                                       ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 21:09                                         ` Jan Kara
2015-08-24 21:45                                         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 21:45                                           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:54                                           ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:54                                             ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-24 22:57                                           ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-24 22:57                                             ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-25 18:11     ` [PATCH v2 block/for-linus] writeback: sync_inodes_sb() must write out I_DIRTY_TIME inodes and always call wait_sb_inodes() Tejun Heo
2015-08-25 18:11       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-25 20:37       ` Jens Axboe
2015-08-25 20:37         ` Jens Axboe
2015-08-26  9:00       ` Jan Kara
2015-08-26  9:00         ` Jan Kara
2015-08-13 23:24   ` generic/04[89] fail on XFS due to change in writeback code [4.2-rc1 regression] Tejun Heo
2015-08-13 23:24     ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-14  6:19     ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-14  6:19       ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-17 20:27       ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-17 20:27         ` Tejun Heo
2015-08-18  3:57         ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-18  3:57           ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-18  5:31           ` Eryu Guan
2015-08-18  5:31             ` Eryu Guan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150813004435.GN3902@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=axboe@fb.com \
    --cc=eguan@redhat.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.