From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:58:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817115817.GA9912@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508121714290.19264@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:16:50PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures
> > when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need
> > to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> > index 1b357997cac5..6eb27cb480b7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ extern void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
> > */
> > static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
> > {
> > + if (!cpusets_enabled())
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > return read_seqcount_begin(¤t->mems_allowed_seq);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
> > */
> > static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
> > {
> > + if (!cpusets_enabled())
> > + return false;
> > +
> > return read_seqcount_retry(¤t->mems_allowed_seq, seq);
> > }
> >
>
> This patch is an obvious improvement, but I think it's also possible to
> change this to be
>
> if (nr_cpusets() <= 1)
> return false;
>
> and likewise in the existing cpusets_enabled() check in
> get_page_from_freelist(). A root cpuset may not exclude mems on the
> system so, even if mounted, there's no need to check or be worried about
> concurrent change when there is only one cpuset.
Good idea. I'll make this a separate patch on top and rename cpuset_enabled
to cpuset_mems_enabled to be clear about what it's checking.
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2015 12:58:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150817115817.GA9912@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1508121714290.19264@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 05:16:50PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Mel Gorman wrote:
>
> > There is a seqcounter that protects against spurious allocation failures
> > when a task is changing the allowed nodes in a cpuset. There is no need
> > to check the seqcounter until a cpuset exists.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
> > Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
> > Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
> > ---
> > include/linux/cpuset.h | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/cpuset.h b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> > index 1b357997cac5..6eb27cb480b7 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/cpuset.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/cpuset.h
> > @@ -104,6 +104,9 @@ extern void cpuset_print_task_mems_allowed(struct task_struct *p);
> > */
> > static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
> > {
> > + if (!cpusets_enabled())
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > return read_seqcount_begin(¤t->mems_allowed_seq);
> > }
> >
> > @@ -115,6 +118,9 @@ static inline unsigned int read_mems_allowed_begin(void)
> > */
> > static inline bool read_mems_allowed_retry(unsigned int seq)
> > {
> > + if (!cpusets_enabled())
> > + return false;
> > +
> > return read_seqcount_retry(¤t->mems_allowed_seq, seq);
> > }
> >
>
> This patch is an obvious improvement, but I think it's also possible to
> change this to be
>
> if (nr_cpusets() <= 1)
> return false;
>
> and likewise in the existing cpusets_enabled() check in
> get_page_from_freelist(). A root cpuset may not exclude mems on the
> system so, even if mounted, there's no need to check or be worried about
> concurrent change when there is only one cpuset.
Good idea. I'll make this a separate patch on top and rename cpuset_enabled
to cpuset_mems_enabled to be clear about what it's checking.
Thanks.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-17 11:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-12 10:45 [PATCH 00/10] Remove zonelist cache and high-order watermark checking v2 Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 01/10] mm, page_alloc: Delete the zonelist_cache Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 13:18 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 13:42 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 13:42 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-21 9:29 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-21 9:29 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 13:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-20 13:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-20 14:17 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 14:17 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 14:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-20 14:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 02/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary parameter from zone_watermark_ok_safe Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 12:30 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 03/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary recalculations for dirty zone balancing Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 12:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 12:45 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 13:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 13:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 14:25 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-13 0:16 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-13 0:16 ` David Rientjes
2015-08-17 11:58 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2015-08-17 11:58 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 05/10] mm, page_alloc: Use masks and shifts when converting GFP flags to migrate types Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 14:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-08-12 14:45 ` Christoph Lameter
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 06/10] mm: page_alloc: Distinguish between being unable to sleep, unwilling to unwilling and avoiding waking kswapd Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-12 13:22 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-19 14:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-19 14:44 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-20 9:14 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 9:14 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-21 13:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-21 13:42 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-21 20:39 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-21 20:39 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 07/10] mm: page_alloc: Rename __GFP_WAIT to __GFP_RECLAIM Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-20 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 12:28 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-20 12:46 ` Michal Hocko
2015-08-21 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-21 14:20 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-08-21 20:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-21 20:56 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 08/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove MIGRATE_RESERVE Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 09/10] mm, page_alloc: Reserve pageblocks for high-order atomic allocations on demand Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` [PATCH 10/10] mm, page_alloc: Only enforce watermarks for order-0 allocations Mel Gorman
2015-08-12 10:45 ` Mel Gorman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-20 8:00 [RFC PATCH 00/10] Remove zonelist cache and high-order watermark checking Mel Gorman
2015-07-20 8:00 ` [PATCH 04/10] mm, page_alloc: Remove unnecessary taking of a seqlock when cpusets are disabled Mel Gorman
2015-07-20 8:00 ` Mel Gorman
2015-07-22 0:11 ` David Rientjes
2015-07-22 0:11 ` David Rientjes
2015-07-28 12:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
2015-07-28 12:32 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150817115817.GA9912@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=rientjes@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.