All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: dave@sr71.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, peterz@infradead.org, riel@redhat.com,
	rientjes@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] mm/vmalloc: Cache the vmalloc memory info
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:47:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824074714.GA20106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150824073422.GC13082@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> +/*
> + * Return a consistent snapshot of the current vmalloc allocation
> + * statistics, for /proc/meminfo:
> + */
> +void get_vmalloc_info(struct vmalloc_info *vmi)
> +{
> +	int gen = READ_ONCE(vmap_info_gen);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the generation counter of the cache matches that of
> +	 * the vmalloc generation counter then return the cache:
> +	 */
> +	if (READ_ONCE(vmap_info_cache_gen) == gen) {
> +		int gen_after;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The two read barriers make sure that we read
> +		 * 'gen', 'vmap_info_cache' and 'gen_after' in
> +		 * precisely that order:
> +		 */
> +		smp_rmb();
> +		*vmi = vmap_info_cache;
> +
> +		smp_rmb();
> +		gen_after = READ_ONCE(vmap_info_gen);
> +
> +		/* The cache is still valid: */
> +		if (gen == gen_after)
> +			return;
> +
> +		/* Ok, the cache got invalidated just now, regenerate it */
> +		gen = gen_after;
> +	}

One more detail: I just realized that with the read barriers, the READ_ONCE() 
accesses are not needed anymore - the barriers and the control dependencies are 
enough.

This will further simplify the code.

Thanks,

	Ingo

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>
Cc: dave@sr71.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk, peterz@infradead.org, riel@redhat.com,
	rientjes@google.com, torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v4] mm/vmalloc: Cache the vmalloc memory info
Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2015 09:47:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150824074714.GA20106@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150824073422.GC13082@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> +/*
> + * Return a consistent snapshot of the current vmalloc allocation
> + * statistics, for /proc/meminfo:
> + */
> +void get_vmalloc_info(struct vmalloc_info *vmi)
> +{
> +	int gen = READ_ONCE(vmap_info_gen);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If the generation counter of the cache matches that of
> +	 * the vmalloc generation counter then return the cache:
> +	 */
> +	if (READ_ONCE(vmap_info_cache_gen) == gen) {
> +		int gen_after;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The two read barriers make sure that we read
> +		 * 'gen', 'vmap_info_cache' and 'gen_after' in
> +		 * precisely that order:
> +		 */
> +		smp_rmb();
> +		*vmi = vmap_info_cache;
> +
> +		smp_rmb();
> +		gen_after = READ_ONCE(vmap_info_gen);
> +
> +		/* The cache is still valid: */
> +		if (gen == gen_after)
> +			return;
> +
> +		/* Ok, the cache got invalidated just now, regenerate it */
> +		gen = gen_after;
> +	}

One more detail: I just realized that with the read barriers, the READ_ONCE() 
accesses are not needed anymore - the barriers and the control dependencies are 
enough.

This will further simplify the code.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-24  7:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-08-23  4:48 [PATCH 0/3] mm/vmalloc: Cache the /proc/meminfo vmalloc statistics George Spelvin
2015-08-23  4:48 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-23  6:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-23  6:04   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-23  6:46   ` George Spelvin
2015-08-23  6:46     ` George Spelvin
2015-08-23  8:17     ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] mm/vmalloc: Cache the vmalloc memory info Ingo Molnar
2015-08-23  8:17       ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-23 20:53       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-23 20:53         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-24  6:58         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  6:58           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  8:39           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-24  8:39             ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-23 21:56       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-23 21:56         ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-24  7:00         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  7:00           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25 16:39         ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-25 16:39           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-25 17:03           ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-25 17:03             ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-24  1:04       ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24  1:04         ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24  7:34         ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  7:34           ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  7:47           ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-08-24  7:47             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  7:50             ` [PATCH 3/3 v5] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24  7:50               ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-24 12:54               ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 12:54                 ` George Spelvin
2015-08-25  9:56                 ` [PATCH 3/3 v6] " Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25  9:56                   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-25 10:36                   ` George Spelvin
2015-08-25 10:36                     ` George Spelvin
2015-08-25 12:59                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-25 12:59                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-25 14:19                   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-25 14:19                     ` Rasmus Villemoes
2015-08-25 15:11                     ` George Spelvin
2015-08-25 15:11                       ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 13:11           ` [PATCH 3/3 v4] " John Stoffel
2015-08-24 13:11             ` John Stoffel
2015-08-24 15:11             ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 15:11               ` George Spelvin
2015-08-24 15:55               ` John Stoffel
2015-08-24 15:55                 ` John Stoffel
2015-08-25 12:46       ` [PATCH 3/3 v3] " Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-25 12:46         ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150824074714.GA20106@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=dave@sr71.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux@horizon.com \
    --cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=rientjes@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.