All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
To: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: add common logic to detect early UART usage
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:06:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907090603.GU9999@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441382419-4343-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de>

Hello Lucas,

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:00:12PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Both earlycon and eralyprintk depend on the bootloader setup UART
> clocks being retained. This patch adds the common logic to detect such
> situations and make the information available to the clock drivers, as
> well as adding the facilities to disable those clocks at the end of
> the kernel init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> index df12b5307175..3357e29e43ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> @@ -73,3 +73,49 @@ void imx_cscmr1_fixup(u32 *val)
>  	*val ^= CSCMR1_FIXUP;
>  	return;
>  }
> +
> +static int __initdata imx_keep_uart_clocks;
> +static struct clk __initdata ***imx_uart_clocks;
> +
> +static int __init imx_keep_uart_clocks_param(char *str)
> +{
> +	imx_keep_uart_clocks = 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +__setup_param("earlycon", imx_keep_uart_earlycon,
> +	      imx_keep_uart_clocks_param, 0);
> +__setup_param("earlyprintk", imx_keep_uart_earlyprintk,
> +	      imx_keep_uart_clocks_param, 0);
> +
> +void __init imx_register_uart_clocks(struct clk **clks[])

const struct clk **clks[]?

I wonder why you need an array of pointers to pointers of clocks. Isn't
one indirection less possible and more easy?

> +{
> +	if (imx_keep_uart_clocks) {
> +		int i;
> +
> +		imx_uart_clocks = clks;
> +		for (i = 0;; i++) {
> +			if (imx_uart_clocks[i])
> +				clk_prepare_enable(*imx_uart_clocks[i]);
> +			else
> +				break;
> +		}

I would have written this as:

	for (i = 0; imx_uart_clocks[i]; ++i)
		clk_prepare_enable(*imx_uart_clocks[i]);

but I guess that's a matter of taste.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de (Uwe Kleine-König)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: add common logic to detect early UART usage
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 11:06:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150907090603.GU9999@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1441382419-4343-2-git-send-email-l.stach@pengutronix.de>

Hello Lucas,

On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 06:00:12PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Both earlycon and eralyprintk depend on the bootloader setup UART
> clocks being retained. This patch adds the common logic to detect such
> situations and make the information available to the clock drivers, as
> well as adding the facilities to disable those clocks at the end of
> the kernel init.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk.c | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/clk/imx/clk.h |  1 +
>  2 files changed, 47 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> index df12b5307175..3357e29e43ab 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/imx/clk.c
> @@ -73,3 +73,49 @@ void imx_cscmr1_fixup(u32 *val)
>  	*val ^= CSCMR1_FIXUP;
>  	return;
>  }
> +
> +static int __initdata imx_keep_uart_clocks;
> +static struct clk __initdata ***imx_uart_clocks;
> +
> +static int __init imx_keep_uart_clocks_param(char *str)
> +{
> +	imx_keep_uart_clocks = 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +__setup_param("earlycon", imx_keep_uart_earlycon,
> +	      imx_keep_uart_clocks_param, 0);
> +__setup_param("earlyprintk", imx_keep_uart_earlyprintk,
> +	      imx_keep_uart_clocks_param, 0);
> +
> +void __init imx_register_uart_clocks(struct clk **clks[])

const struct clk **clks[]?

I wonder why you need an array of pointers to pointers of clocks. Isn't
one indirection less possible and more easy?

> +{
> +	if (imx_keep_uart_clocks) {
> +		int i;
> +
> +		imx_uart_clocks = clks;
> +		for (i = 0;; i++) {
> +			if (imx_uart_clocks[i])
> +				clk_prepare_enable(*imx_uart_clocks[i]);
> +			else
> +				break;
> +		}

I would have written this as:

	for (i = 0; imx_uart_clocks[i]; ++i)
		clk_prepare_enable(*imx_uart_clocks[i]);

but I guess that's a matter of taste.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-K?nig            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-09-07  9:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-09-04 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/8] i.MX early debug UART clock fixes Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] clk: imx: add common logic to detect early UART usage Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-06 14:21   ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-06 14:21     ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-07  9:06   ` Uwe Kleine-König [this message]
2015-09-07  9:06     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-09-07  9:15     ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-07  9:15       ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-07  9:50       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-09-07  9:50         ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] clk: imx25: retain early UART clocks during kernel init Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-06 14:23   ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-06 14:23     ` Shawn Guo
2015-09-07  9:10     ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-09-07  9:10       ` Uwe Kleine-König
2015-09-07  9:18       ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-07  9:18         ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] clk: imx27: " Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] clk: imx31: " Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] clk: imx35: " Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] clk: imx5: " Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] clk: imx6: " Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] clk: imx7d: " Lucas Stach
2015-09-04 16:00   ` Lucas Stach

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150907090603.GU9999@pengutronix.de \
    --to=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=patchwork-lst@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.