From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
dipankar@in.ibm.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
josh@joshtriplett.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com, dvhart@linux.intel.com,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com,
bobby prani <bobby.prani@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to allow consolidation
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 12:24:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008102423.GK3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151007151829.GH3910@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, Oct 07, 2015 at 08:18:29AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Actually, this would be quite good. "Premature abstraction is the
> root of all evil" and all that, but this abstraction is anything but
> premature. My thought would be to have it against commit cd58087c9cee
> ("Merge branches 'doc.2015.10.06a', 'percpu-rwsem.2015.10.06a' and
> 'torture.2015.10.06a' into HEAD") in -rcu given the merge conflicts
> that would otherwise arise.
OK here goes, compile tested this time ;-)
---
Subject: rcu: Clarify the smp_mb__after_unlock_lock usage
Because undocumented barriers are bad remove all the uncommented
smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() usage and replace it with a documented set
of wrappers.
The problem is that PPC has RCpc UNLOCK+LOCK where all other archs have
RCsc, which means that on PPC UNLOCK x + LOCK y does not form a full
barrier (which also implies transitivity) and needs help.
AFAICT the only case where this really matters is the rcu_node tree
traversal, where we want to ensure the state a node is 'complete' before
propagating its state up the tree, such that once we reach the top, all
CPUs agree on the observed state.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 128 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
kernel/rcu/tree.h | 11 ----
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 18 +++----
3 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index b7cd210f3b1e..6ee3a6ffcc27 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1482,6 +1482,56 @@ static void trace_rcu_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
}
/*
+ * Place this after a lock-acquisition primitive to guarantee that
+ * an UNLOCK+LOCK pair act as a full barrier. This guarantee applies
+ * if the UNLOCK and LOCK are executed by the same CPU or if the
+ * UNLOCK and LOCK operate on the same lock variable.
+ */
+#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
+#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() smp_mb() /* Full ordering for lock. */
+#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
+#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() do { } while (0)
+#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
+
+/*
+ * Wrappers for the rcu_node::lock acquire.
+ *
+ * Because the rcu_nodes form a tree, the tree traversal locking will observe
+ * different lock values, this in turn means that an UNLOCK of one level
+ * followed by a LOCK of another level does not imply a full memory barrier;
+ * and most importantly transitivity is lost.
+ *
+ * In order to restore full ordering between tree levels, augment the regular
+ * lock acquire functions with smp_mb__after_unlock_lock().
+ */
+static inline void raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock);
+ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+}
+
+static inline void raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
+ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+}
+
+#define raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags) \
+do { \
+ typecheck(unsigned long, flags); \
+ flags = _raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&(rnp)->lock); \
+ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); \
+} while (0)
+
+static inline bool raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(struct rcu_node *rnp)
+{
+ bool locked = raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->lock);
+ if (locked)
+ smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ return locked;
+}
+
+/*
* Start some future grace period, as needed to handle newly arrived
* callbacks. The required future grace periods are recorded in each
* rcu_node structure's ->need_future_gp field. Returns true if there
@@ -1534,10 +1584,8 @@ rcu_start_future_gp(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
* hold it, acquire the root rcu_node structure's lock in order to
* start one (if needed).
*/
- if (rnp != rnp_root) {
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp_root->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
- }
+ if (rnp != rnp_root)
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
/*
* Get a new grace-period number. If there really is no grace
@@ -1786,11 +1834,10 @@ static void note_gp_changes(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
if ((rdp->gpnum == READ_ONCE(rnp->gpnum) &&
rdp->completed == READ_ONCE(rnp->completed) &&
!unlikely(READ_ONCE(rdp->gpwrap))) || /* w/out lock. */
- !raw_spin_trylock(&rnp->lock)) { /* irqs already off, so later. */
+ !raw_spin_trylock_rcu_node(rnp)) { /* irqs already off, so later. */
local_irq_restore(flags);
return;
}
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
needwake = __note_gp_changes(rsp, rnp, rdp);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
if (needwake)
@@ -1814,8 +1861,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity, jiffies);
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
if (!READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags)) {
/* Spurious wakeup, tell caller to go back to sleep. */
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
@@ -1847,8 +1893,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
*/
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) {
rcu_gp_slow(rsp, gp_preinit_delay);
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
if (rnp->qsmaskinit == rnp->qsmaskinitnext &&
!rnp->wait_blkd_tasks) {
/* Nothing to do on this leaf rcu_node structure. */
@@ -1904,8 +1949,7 @@ static int rcu_gp_init(struct rcu_state *rsp)
*/
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
rcu_gp_slow(rsp, gp_init_delay);
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rsp->rda);
rcu_preempt_check_blocked_tasks(rnp);
rnp->qsmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
@@ -1973,8 +2017,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_fqs(struct rcu_state *rsp, bool first_time)
}
/* Clear flag to prevent immediate re-entry. */
if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) {
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags,
READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & ~RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS);
raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rnp->lock);
@@ -1993,8 +2036,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
struct rcu_node *rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
WRITE_ONCE(rsp->gp_activity, jiffies);
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
gp_duration = jiffies - rsp->gp_start;
if (gp_duration > rsp->gp_max)
rsp->gp_max = gp_duration;
@@ -2019,8 +2061,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
* grace period is recorded in any of the rcu_node structures.
*/
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp);
WARN_ON_ONCE(rcu_preempt_blocked_readers_cgp(rnp));
WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->qsmask);
WRITE_ONCE(rnp->completed, rsp->gpnum);
@@ -2035,8 +2076,7 @@ static void rcu_gp_cleanup(struct rcu_state *rsp)
rcu_gp_slow(rsp, gp_cleanup_delay);
}
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
- raw_spin_lock_irq(&rnp->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); /* Order GP before ->completed update. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irq_rcu_node(rnp); /* Order GP before ->completed update. */
rcu_nocb_gp_set(rnp, nocb);
/* Declare grace period done. */
@@ -2284,8 +2324,7 @@ rcu_report_qs_rnp(unsigned long mask, struct rcu_state *rsp,
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
rnp_c = rnp;
rnp = rnp->parent;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
oldmask = rnp_c->qsmask;
}
@@ -2332,8 +2371,7 @@ static void rcu_report_unblock_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
gps = rnp->gpnum;
mask = rnp->grpmask;
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp_p->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_p); /* irqs already disabled. */
rcu_report_qs_rnp(mask, rsp, rnp_p, gps, flags);
}
@@ -2355,8 +2393,7 @@ rcu_report_qs_rdp(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
struct rcu_node *rnp;
rnp = rdp->mynode;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if ((rdp->cpu_no_qs.b.norm &&
rdp->rcu_qs_ctr_snap == __this_cpu_read(rcu_qs_ctr)) ||
rdp->gpnum != rnp->gpnum || rnp->completed == rnp->gpnum ||
@@ -2582,8 +2619,7 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dead_rnp(struct rcu_node *rnp_leaf)
rnp = rnp->parent;
if (!rnp)
break;
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); /* GP memory ordering. */
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp->qsmaskinit &= ~mask;
rnp->qsmask &= ~mask;
if (rnp->qsmaskinit) {
@@ -2611,8 +2647,7 @@ static void rcu_cleanup_dying_idle_cpu(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* Remove outgoing CPU from mask in the leaf rcu_node structure. */
mask = rdp->grpmask;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(); /* Enforce GP memory-order guarantee. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags); /* Enforce GP memory-order guarantee. */
rnp->qsmaskinitnext &= ~mask;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
@@ -2809,8 +2844,7 @@ static void force_qs_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) {
cond_resched_rcu_qs();
mask = 0;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if (rnp->qsmask == 0) {
if (rcu_state_p == &rcu_sched_state ||
rsp != rcu_state_p ||
@@ -2881,8 +2915,7 @@ static void force_quiescent_state(struct rcu_state *rsp)
/* rnp_old == rcu_get_root(rsp), rnp == NULL. */
/* Reached the root of the rcu_node tree, acquire lock. */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_old->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp_old, flags);
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_old->fqslock);
if (READ_ONCE(rsp->gp_flags) & RCU_GP_FLAG_FQS) {
rsp->n_force_qs_lh++;
@@ -3005,8 +3038,7 @@ static void __call_rcu_core(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_data *rdp,
if (!rcu_gp_in_progress(rsp)) {
struct rcu_node *rnp_root = rcu_get_root(rsp);
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp_root->lock);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp_root);
needwake = rcu_start_gp(rsp);
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp_root->lock);
if (needwake)
@@ -3426,8 +3458,7 @@ static void sync_exp_reset_tree_hotplug(struct rcu_state *rsp)
* CPUs for the current rcu_node structure up the rcu_node tree.
*/
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if (rnp->expmaskinit == rnp->expmaskinitnext) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
continue; /* No new CPUs, nothing to do. */
@@ -3447,8 +3478,7 @@ static void sync_exp_reset_tree_hotplug(struct rcu_state *rsp)
rnp_up = rnp->parent;
done = false;
while (rnp_up) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp_up->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp_up, flags);
if (rnp_up->expmaskinit)
done = true;
rnp_up->expmaskinit |= mask;
@@ -3472,8 +3502,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused sync_exp_reset_tree(struct rcu_state *rsp)
sync_exp_reset_tree_hotplug(rsp);
rcu_for_each_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
WARN_ON_ONCE(rnp->expmask);
rnp->expmask = rnp->expmaskinit;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
@@ -3531,8 +3560,7 @@ static void __rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
mask = rnp->grpmask;
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled */
rnp = rnp->parent;
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled */
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs already disabled */
WARN_ON_ONCE(!(rnp->expmask & mask));
rnp->expmask &= ~mask;
}
@@ -3549,8 +3577,7 @@ static void __maybe_unused rcu_report_exp_rnp(struct rcu_state *rsp,
{
unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
__rcu_report_exp_rnp(rsp, rnp, wake, flags);
}
@@ -3564,8 +3591,7 @@ static void rcu_report_exp_cpu_mult(struct rcu_state *rsp, struct rcu_node *rnp,
{
unsigned long flags;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
if (!(rnp->expmask & mask)) {
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
return;
@@ -3708,8 +3734,7 @@ static void sync_rcu_exp_select_cpus(struct rcu_state *rsp,
sync_exp_reset_tree(rsp);
rcu_for_each_leaf_node(rsp, rnp) {
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
/* Each pass checks a CPU for identity, offline, and idle. */
mask_ofl_test = 0;
@@ -4198,8 +4223,7 @@ rcu_init_percpu_data(int cpu, struct rcu_state *rsp)
*/
rnp = rdp->mynode;
mask = rdp->grpmask;
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs already disabled. */
rnp->qsmaskinitnext |= mask;
rnp->expmaskinitnext |= mask;
if (!rdp->beenonline)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 9fb4e238d4dc..1d2eb0859f70 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -653,14 +653,3 @@ static inline void rcu_nocb_q_lengths(struct rcu_data *rdp, long *ql, long *qll)
}
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_TRACE */
-/*
- * Place this after a lock-acquisition primitive to guarantee that
- * an UNLOCK+LOCK pair act as a full barrier. This guarantee applies
- * if the UNLOCK and LOCK are executed by the same CPU or if the
- * UNLOCK and LOCK operate on the same lock variable.
- */
-#ifdef CONFIG_PPC
-#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() smp_mb() /* Full ordering for lock. */
-#else /* #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
-#define smp_mb__after_unlock_lock() do { } while (0)
-#endif /* #else #ifdef CONFIG_PPC */
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index 630c19772630..fa0e3b96a9ed 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -301,8 +301,7 @@ static void rcu_preempt_note_context_switch(void)
/* Possibly blocking in an RCU read-side critical section. */
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(rcu_state_p->rda);
rnp = rdp->mynode;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.blocked = true;
t->rcu_blocked_node = rnp;
@@ -457,8 +456,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t)
*/
for (;;) {
rnp = t->rcu_blocked_node;
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs already disabled. */
if (rnp == t->rcu_blocked_node)
break;
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
@@ -989,8 +987,7 @@ static int rcu_boost(struct rcu_node *rnp)
READ_ONCE(rnp->boost_tasks) == NULL)
return 0; /* Nothing left to boost. */
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
/*
* Recheck under the lock: all tasks in need of boosting
@@ -1176,8 +1173,7 @@ static int rcu_spawn_one_boost_kthread(struct rcu_state *rsp,
"rcub/%d", rnp_index);
if (IS_ERR(t))
return PTR_ERR(t);
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
rnp->boost_kthread_task = t;
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
sp.sched_priority = kthread_prio;
@@ -1567,8 +1563,7 @@ static void rcu_prepare_for_idle(void)
if (!*rdp->nxttail[RCU_DONE_TAIL])
continue;
rnp = rdp->mynode;
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_rcu_node(rnp); /* irqs already disabled. */
needwake = rcu_accelerate_cbs(rsp, rnp, rdp);
raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
if (needwake)
@@ -2068,8 +2063,7 @@ static void rcu_nocb_wait_gp(struct rcu_data *rdp)
bool needwake;
struct rcu_node *rnp = rdp->mynode;
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
- smp_mb__after_unlock_lock();
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave_rcu_node(rnp, flags);
needwake = rcu_start_future_gp(rnp, rdp, &c);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
if (needwake)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-06 16:29 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/18] Expedited grace-period improvements for 4.4 Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/18] rcu: Use rsp->expedited_wq instead of sync_rcu_preempt_exp_wq Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 02/18] rcu: Move rcu_report_exp_rnp() to allow consolidation Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 20:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-06 20:58 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 7:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 8:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2015-10-07 11:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 11:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:05 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:09 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:11 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-07 12:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:44 ` [kbuild-all] " Fengguang Wu
2015-10-07 13:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 14:21 ` Fengguang Wu
2015-10-07 14:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:18 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 10:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-10-07 15:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 17:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 17:46 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 0:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 03/18] rcu: Consolidate tree setup for synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 04/18] rcu: Use single-stage IPI algorithm for RCU expedited grace period Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 18:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 15:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:14 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:13 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 05/18] rcu: Move synchronize_sched_expedited() to combining tree Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 06/18] rcu: Rename qs_pending to core_needs_qs Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 07/18] rcu: Invert passed_quiesce and rename to cpu_no_qs Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 08/18] rcu: Make ->cpu_no_qs be a union for aggregate OR Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 09/18] rcu: Switch synchronize_sched_expedited() to IPI Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:24 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 10/18] rcu: Stop silencing lockdep false positive for expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 11/18] rcu: Stop excluding CPU hotplug in synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 12/18] cpu: Remove try_get_online_cpus() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 13/18] rcu: Prepare for consolidating expedited CPU selection Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 14/18] rcu: Consolidate " Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 15/18] rcu: Add online/offline info to expedited stall warning message Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 16/18] rcu: Add tasks to expedited stall-warning messages Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 17/18] rcu: Enable stall warnings for synchronize_rcu_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-06 16:29 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 18/18] rcu: Better hotplug handling for synchronize_sched_expedited() Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-07 14:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 16:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 15:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-08 18:01 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-09 0:11 ` Paul E. McKenney
2015-10-09 0:48 ` Josh Triplett
2015-10-09 3:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151008102423.GK3604@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bobby.prani@gmail.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dipankar@in.ibm.com \
--cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.