All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:22:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151112122257.GE3641@gandi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424516AF-C3E7-4D00-8889-ED7EA8EF315E@intel.com>

On Nov11 22:13, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> Just so you know, there are patches in queue that will improve this situation in two ways:
> 1) When the I2C probe times out, the code assumes that the cage is empty and does not retry the access until the next probe.
> 2) The driver will use its own private workqueue, so it will not affect the system workqueues at all.

Thanks guys for the details,  I will have a look.
-- 
William
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20151112/429bf702/attachment.asc>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>
To: "Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@intel.com>
Cc: William Dauchy <william@gandi.net>,
	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org"
	<intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org>,
	"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Tantilov, Emil S" <emil.s.tantilov@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:22:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151112122257.GE3641@gandi.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <424516AF-C3E7-4D00-8889-ED7EA8EF315E@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 433 bytes --]

On Nov11 22:13, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> Just so you know, there are patches in queue that will improve this situation in two ways:
> 1) When the I2C probe times out, the code assumes that the cage is empty and does not retry the access until the next probe.
> 2) The driver will use its own private workqueue, so it will not affect the system workqueues at all.

Thanks guys for the details,  I will have a look.
-- 
William

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-12 12:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-11 17:35 [Intel-wired-lan] regression in ixgbe SFP detection patch William Dauchy
2015-11-11 17:35 ` William Dauchy
2015-11-11 20:33 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Tantilov, Emil S
2015-11-11 20:33   ` Tantilov, Emil S
2015-11-11 21:34   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " William Dauchy
2015-11-11 21:34     ` William Dauchy
2015-11-11 22:09     ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Alexander Duyck
2015-11-11 22:09       ` Alexander Duyck
2015-11-11 22:13   ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Rustad, Mark D
2015-11-11 22:13     ` Rustad, Mark D
2015-11-12 12:22     ` William Dauchy [this message]
2015-11-12 12:22       ` William Dauchy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151112122257.GE3641@gandi.net \
    --to=william@gandi.net \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.