All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2015 01:38:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117013830.GV8456@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447673600-8881-2-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
>    ... when != of_node_put(child)
>        when != e = child
> (
>    return child;
> |
> *  return ...;
> )
>    ...
>  }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> ---

For this patch:

Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

>  drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[snip patch, which fixes of_node_put() handling for
for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, which creates PHY devices with
devm_phy_create()]

This reminds me of a potential problem I'm looking at in other
subsystems: from code reading (I haven't seen any issues in practice,
probably because I don't use OF_DYNAMIC) it looks like device-creating
infrastructure like the PHY subsystem should be acquiring a reference to
the device_node when they stash it away. But drivers/phy/phy-core.c does
not do this, AFAICT.

See phy_create(), which does

	phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;

and later might reuse this of_node pointer, even though it never called
of_node_get() on this node.

Potential patch to fix this (not tested).

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index fc48fac003a6..8df29caeeef9 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 	phy->dev.class = phy_class;
 	phy->dev.parent = dev;
 	phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
+	of_node_get(phy->dev.of_node);
 	phy->id = id;
 	phy->ops = ops;
 
@@ -726,6 +727,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 	return phy;
 
 put_dev:
+	of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
 	put_device(&phy->dev);  /* calls phy_release() which frees resources */
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_phy_create);
  */
 void phy_destroy(struct phy *phy)
 {
+	of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&phy->dev);
 	device_unregister(&phy->dev);
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:38:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117013830.GV8456@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447673600-8881-2-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
>    ... when != of_node_put(child)
>        when != e = child
> (
>    return child;
> |
> *  return ...;
> )
>    ...
>  }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> ---

For this patch:

Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

>  drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[snip patch, which fixes of_node_put() handling for
for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, which creates PHY devices with
devm_phy_create()]

This reminds me of a potential problem I'm looking at in other
subsystems: from code reading (I haven't seen any issues in practice,
probably because I don't use OF_DYNAMIC) it looks like device-creating
infrastructure like the PHY subsystem should be acquiring a reference to
the device_node when they stash it away. But drivers/phy/phy-core.c does
not do this, AFAICT.

See phy_create(), which does

	phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;

and later might reuse this of_node pointer, even though it never called
of_node_get() on this node.

Potential patch to fix this (not tested).

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index fc48fac003a6..8df29caeeef9 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 	phy->dev.class = phy_class;
 	phy->dev.parent = dev;
 	phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
+	of_node_get(phy->dev.of_node);
 	phy->id = id;
 	phy->ops = ops;
 
@@ -726,6 +727,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 	return phy;
 
 put_dev:
+	of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
 	put_device(&phy->dev);  /* calls phy_release() which frees resources */
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_phy_create);
  */
 void phy_destroy(struct phy *phy)
 {
+	of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&phy->dev);
 	device_unregister(&phy->dev);
 }

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
	kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org,
	Gregory Fong <gregory.0xf0@gmail.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2015 17:38:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151117013830.GV8456@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447673600-8881-2-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 12:33:14PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> for_each_available_child_of_node performs an of_node_get on each iteration,
> so a return from the middle of the loop requires an of_node_put.
> 
> A simplified version of the semantic patch that finds this problem is as
> follows (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr):
> 
> // <smpl>
> @@
> expression root,e;
> local idexpression child;
> @@
> 
>  for_each_available_child_of_node(root, child) {
>    ... when != of_node_put(child)
>        when != e = child
> (
>    return child;
> |
> *  return ...;
> )
>    ...
>  }
> // </smpl>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>
> 
> ---

For this patch:

Acked-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

>  drivers/phy/phy-brcmstb-sata.c |   17 ++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

[snip patch, which fixes of_node_put() handling for
for_each_available_child_of_node() loop, which creates PHY devices with
devm_phy_create()]

This reminds me of a potential problem I'm looking at in other
subsystems: from code reading (I haven't seen any issues in practice,
probably because I don't use OF_DYNAMIC) it looks like device-creating
infrastructure like the PHY subsystem should be acquiring a reference to
the device_node when they stash it away. But drivers/phy/phy-core.c does
not do this, AFAICT.

See phy_create(), which does

	phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;

and later might reuse this of_node pointer, even though it never called
of_node_get() on this node.

Potential patch to fix this (not tested).

Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>

diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
index fc48fac003a6..8df29caeeef9 100644
--- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
+++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c
@@ -697,6 +697,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 	phy->dev.class = phy_class;
 	phy->dev.parent = dev;
 	phy->dev.of_node = node ?: dev->of_node;
+	of_node_get(phy->dev.of_node);
 	phy->id = id;
 	phy->ops = ops;
 
@@ -726,6 +727,7 @@ struct phy *phy_create(struct device *dev, struct device_node *node,
 	return phy;
 
 put_dev:
+	of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
 	put_device(&phy->dev);  /* calls phy_release() which frees resources */
 	return ERR_PTR(ret);
 
@@ -775,6 +777,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(devm_phy_create);
  */
 void phy_destroy(struct phy *phy)
 {
+	of_node_put(phy->dev.of_node);
 	pm_runtime_disable(&phy->dev);
 	device_unregister(&phy->dev);
 }

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-17  1:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-16 11:33 [PATCH 0/7] add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17  1:38   ` Brian Norris [this message]
2015-11-17  1:38     ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17  1:38     ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17  6:12     ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17  6:12       ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17  6:12       ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:44       ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:44         ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:44         ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:48         ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:48           ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:48           ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 18:30           ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:30             ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:30             ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34             ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34               ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34               ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 22:33             ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 22:33               ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 22:33               ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 19:05               ` device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:05                 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:05                 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:05                 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 20:39                 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:39                   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:39                   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:39                   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-19 18:44                 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 18:44                   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 18:44                   ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 19:14                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-19 19:14                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-19 19:14                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-19 22:58                     ` Rob Herring
2015-11-27 14:14     ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-27 14:26       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-27 14:14       ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] phy: mt65xx-usb3: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] phy: berlin-sata: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-19 20:48   ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-11-19 20:48     ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] phy: rockchip-usb: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 19:27   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:27     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:27     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:31     ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:31       ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:31       ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:46       ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:46         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:46         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:46         ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:38         ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:38           ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:38           ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:40           ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:40             ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:40             ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42   ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42     ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] phy: miphy28lp: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] phy: miphy365x: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] phy: cygnus: pcie: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33   ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 17:12   ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 17:12     ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 17:12     ` Ray Jui

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151117013830.GV8456@google.com \
    --to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.