From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] phy: rockchip-usb: add missing of_node_put
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 19:31:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118193129.GA48815@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19587543.sZ81DoLUBT@diego>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. November 2015, 12:33:17 schrieb Julia Lawall:
> hmm, while I agree that the rockchip phy has an issue in the node lifecycle,
> I'm not sure that patch fixes it fully.
>
> It currently iterates over each phy, but would only of_node_put the phy it
> handled last. So if an error happens on the 3rd phy, the first 2 are already
> instantiated and would also get removed when the overall probe fails, but
> their of_node would never be "put".
Note the behavior of of_get_next_child() (and
of_get_next_available_child()); it "Decrements the refcount of prev." So
the loop only keeps a reference for (at most) one node at a time.
I believe Julia's patch is correct. It's possible the commit description
could have made this aspect clearer though, since I was confused about
this at first as well.
Regards,
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Jason Cooper <jason@lakedaemon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] phy: rockchip-usb: add missing of_node_put
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:31:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118193129.GA48815@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19587543.sZ81DoLUBT@diego>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. November 2015, 12:33:17 schrieb Julia Lawall:
> hmm, while I agree that the rockchip phy has an issue in the node lifecycle,
> I'm not sure that patch fixes it fully.
>
> It currently iterates over each phy, but would only of_node_put the phy it
> handled last. So if an error happens on the 3rd phy, the first 2 are already
> instantiated and would also get removed when the overall probe fails, but
> their of_node would never be "put".
Note the behavior of of_get_next_child() (and
of_get_next_available_child()); it "Decrements the refcount of prev." So
the loop only keeps a reference for (at most) one node at a time.
I believe Julia's patch is correct. It's possible the commit description
could have made this aspect clearer though, since I was confused about
this at first as well.
Regards,
Brian
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: computersforpeace@gmail.com (Brian Norris)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] phy: rockchip-usb: add missing of_node_put
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 11:31:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118193129.GA48815@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <19587543.sZ81DoLUBT@diego>
On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 08:27:07PM +0100, Heiko St?bner wrote:
> Am Montag, 16. November 2015, 12:33:17 schrieb Julia Lawall:
> hmm, while I agree that the rockchip phy has an issue in the node lifecycle,
> I'm not sure that patch fixes it fully.
>
> It currently iterates over each phy, but would only of_node_put the phy it
> handled last. So if an error happens on the 3rd phy, the first 2 are already
> instantiated and would also get removed when the overall probe fails, but
> their of_node would never be "put".
Note the behavior of of_get_next_child() (and
of_get_next_available_child()); it "Decrements the refcount of prev." So
the loop only keeps a reference for (at most) one node at a time.
I believe Julia's patch is correct. It's possible the commit description
could have made this aspect clearer though, since I was confused about
this at first as well.
Regards,
Brian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-18 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-16 11:33 [PATCH 0/7] add missing of_node_put Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 1:38 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 1:38 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 1:38 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 6:12 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:44 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:44 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:44 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 17:48 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:48 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 17:48 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 18:30 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:30 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:30 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 18:34 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-17 22:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 22:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-17 22:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 19:05 ` device_node lifetime (was: Re: [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put) Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:05 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:05 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:05 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 20:39 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:39 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:39 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:39 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-19 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 18:44 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-19 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-19 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-19 19:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-11-19 22:58 ` Rob Herring
2015-11-27 14:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] phy: brcmstb-sata: add missing of_node_put Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-27 14:26 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-27 14:14 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 2/7] phy: mt65xx-usb3: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 3/7] phy: berlin-sata: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-19 20:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-11-19 20:48 ` Sebastian Hesselbarth
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 4/7] phy: rockchip-usb: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 19:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:27 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:31 ` Brian Norris [this message]
2015-11-18 19:31 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:31 ` Brian Norris
2015-11-18 19:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 19:46 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:38 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:38 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:38 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-18 20:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 20:40 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-18 21:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 5/7] phy: miphy28lp: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 6/7] phy: miphy365x: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` [PATCH 7/7] phy: cygnus: pcie: " Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 11:33 ` Julia Lawall
2015-11-16 17:12 ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 17:12 ` Ray Jui
2015-11-16 17:12 ` Ray Jui
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151118193129.GA48815@google.com \
--to=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.