From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -next] netfilter: nf_ct_sctp: validate vtag for new conntrack entries
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 16:15:29 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151126161529.GA4350@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151126160227.GQ16828@macbook.localdomain>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 04:02:27PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 26.11, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:24:11PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > Consider:
> > >
> > > -i eth0 -j CT --track
> > > -i eth0 -p sctp --dport 1234 -j ACCEPT
> > > -i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
[...]
> > IMO we should skip enabling things by default. When we enable things
> > by default someone else follow up later on with some scenario we
> > didn't consider and then we've got problems. I think we should go in
> > the direction of explicit configurations, we already do this for
> > conntrack helpers.
>
> Well as I already said, it doesn't solve anything regarding this problem,
> so how is it relevant?
This doesn't sound so complicated to me:
add rule filter prerouting \
ip protocol { tcp, udp, sctp } track
You just specify what you need for stateful tracking.
The case above you indicate is enabling conntrack for all packets, the
-j CT --track is what should govern this IMO.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
To: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
Michal Kubecek <mkubecek@suse.cz>,
Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>,
netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org,
Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@gmail.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -next] netfilter: nf_ct_sctp: validate vtag for new conntrack entries
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2015 17:15:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151126161529.GA4350@salvia> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151126160227.GQ16828@macbook.localdomain>
On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 04:02:27PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> On 26.11, Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 26, 2015 at 03:24:11PM +0000, Patrick McHardy wrote:
> > > Consider:
> > >
> > > -i eth0 -j CT --track
> > > -i eth0 -p sctp --dport 1234 -j ACCEPT
> > > -i eth0 -m state --state ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT
[...]
> > IMO we should skip enabling things by default. When we enable things
> > by default someone else follow up later on with some scenario we
> > didn't consider and then we've got problems. I think we should go in
> > the direction of explicit configurations, we already do this for
> > conntrack helpers.
>
> Well as I already said, it doesn't solve anything regarding this problem,
> so how is it relevant?
This doesn't sound so complicated to me:
add rule filter prerouting \
ip protocol { tcp, udp, sctp } track
You just specify what you need for stateful tracking.
The case above you indicate is enabling conntrack for all packets, the
-j CT --track is what should govern this IMO.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-26 16:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-25 19:13 [RFC PATCH -next] netfilter: nf_ct_sctp: validate vtag for new conntrack entries Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-11-25 19:13 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-11-25 19:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-25 19:42 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-25 20:20 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-11-25 20:20 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-11-25 20:58 ` Michal Kubecek
2015-11-25 20:58 ` Michal Kubecek
2015-11-26 9:51 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 9:51 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 12:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-11-26 12:52 ` Marcelo Ricardo Leitner
2015-11-26 14:15 ` Patrick McHardy
2015-11-26 14:33 ` Florian Westphal
2015-11-26 14:33 ` Florian Westphal
2015-11-26 14:49 ` Patrick McHardy
2015-11-26 15:07 ` Florian Westphal
2015-11-26 15:07 ` Florian Westphal
2015-11-26 15:11 ` Patrick McHardy
2015-11-26 15:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 15:12 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 15:24 ` Patrick McHardy
2015-11-26 15:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 15:54 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 16:02 ` Patrick McHardy
2015-11-26 16:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso [this message]
2015-11-26 16:15 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 16:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2015-11-26 16:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 16:43 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2015-11-26 16:53 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151126161529.GA4350@salvia \
--to=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-sctp@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcelo.leitner@gmail.com \
--cc=mkubecek@suse.cz \
--cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=vyasevich@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.