Re: [PATCH (v6) 1/2] mtd: brcmnand: Add brcm,bcm63268-nand device tree binding

[Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com>]

+ Broadcom list + Kamal

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 08:19:37PM -0000, Simon Arlott wrote:
> Add device tree binding for NAND on the BCM63268.
> 
> The BCM63268 has a NAND interrupt register with combined status and enable
> registers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Simon Arlott <simon@fire.lp0.eu>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt      | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
> index 4ff7128..f2a71c8 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/brcm,brcmnand.txt
> @@ -72,6 +72,14 @@ we define additional 'compatible' properties and associated register resources w
>         and enable registers
>       - reg-names: (required) "nand-int-base"
> 
> +   * "brcm,nand-bcm63268"
> +     - compatible: should contain "brcm,nand-bcm<soc>", "brcm,nand-bcm63268"

Looks like you're aiming to support bcm63168? Is bcm63268 the first
chip to include this style of register then? The numbering seems
backwards, but that may just be reality.

> +     - reg: (required) the 'NAND_INTR_BASE' register range, with combined status
> +       and enable registers, and boot address registers
> +     - reg-names: (required) "nand-intr-base"
> +     - clock: (required) reference to the clock for the NAND controller
> +     - clock-names: (required) "nand"
> +
>     * "brcm,nand-iproc"
>       - reg: (required) the "IDM" register range, for interrupt enable and APB
>         bus access endianness configuration, and the "EXT" register range,
> @@ -148,3 +156,30 @@ nand@f0442800 {
>  		};
>  	};
>  };
> +
> +nand@10000200 {
> +	compatible = "brcm,nand-bcm63168", "brcm,nand-bcm63268",
> +		"brcm,brcmnand-v4.0", "brcm,brcmnand";
> +	reg = <0x10000200 0x180>,
> +	      <0x10000600 0x200>,
> +	      <0x100000b0 0x10>;
> +	reg-names = "nand", "nand-cache", "nand-intr-base";
> +	interrupt-parent = <&periph_intc>;
> +	interrupts = <50>;
> +	clocks = <&periph_clk 20>;
> +	clock-names = "nand";
> +
> +	#address-cells = <1>;
> +	#size-cells = <0>;
> +
> +	nand0: nandcs@0 {
> +		compatible = "brcm,nandcs";
> +		reg = <0>;
> +		nand-on-flash-bbt;
> +		nand-ecc-strength = <1>;
> +		nand-ecc-step-size = <512>;
> +
> +		#address-cells = <0>;
> +		#size-cells = <0>;

What are these {address,size}-cells for? If you need them for
partitioning, then those are wrong -- they shouldn't be zero. Maybe just
drop them? (I can cut them out when applying, if that's the only change
to make.)

> +	};
> +};

Brian