From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: fu.wei@linaro.org
Cc: tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org, tn@semihalf.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net,
lenb@kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org, graeme.gregory@linaro.org,
al.stone@linaro.org, hanjun.guo@linaro.org, mark.rutland@arm.com,
Marc.Zyngier@arm.com, rruigrok@codeaurora.org,
harba@qti.qualcomm.com, jcm@redhat.com, msalter@redhat.com,
grant.likely@linaro.org, rrichter@cavium.com,
jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com, jon.zhixiong.zhang@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64.
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:34:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208123433.GB404@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449558183-12259-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:03:03PM +0800, fu.wei@linaro.org wrote:
> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
[...]
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> /*
> * Check if firmware advertises firmware first mode. We need FF bit to be set
> * along with a set of MC banks which work in FF mode.
> */
> static int __init hest_parse_cmc(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
> {
> - return arch_apei_enable_cmcff(hest_hdr, data);
> + if (!acpi_disable_cmcff)
Why do not you define the flag above in this file (move it out of x86 -
that's what I was aiming at in my previous reply) and remove this ifdeffery
altogether (First firmware handling could apply to arm64 too according to
specs and ACPI on arm64 guidelines) ?
arch_apei_enable_cmcff() is a weak function that does nothing on arm64
and if we need to add an implementation we can do it later.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> + return !arch_apei_enable_cmcff(hest_hdr, data);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int __init hest_ia_init(void)
> +{
> + return apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int __init hest_ia_init(void) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> struct ghes_arr {
> struct platform_device **ghes_devs;
> unsigned int count;
> @@ -232,8 +244,9 @@ void __init acpi_hest_init(void)
> goto err;
> }
>
> - if (!acpi_disable_cmcff)
> - apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL);
> + rc = hest_ia_init();
> + if (rc)
> + goto err;
>
> if (!ghes_disable) {
> rc = apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_ghes_count, &ghes_count);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com (Lorenzo Pieralisi)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64.
Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2015 12:34:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151208123433.GB404@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1449558183-12259-1-git-send-email-fu.wei@linaro.org>
On Tue, Dec 08, 2015 at 03:03:03PM +0800, fu.wei at linaro.org wrote:
> From: Tomasz Nowicki <tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org>
[...]
> +#if defined(__i386__) || defined(__x86_64__)
> /*
> * Check if firmware advertises firmware first mode. We need FF bit to be set
> * along with a set of MC banks which work in FF mode.
> */
> static int __init hest_parse_cmc(struct acpi_hest_header *hest_hdr, void *data)
> {
> - return arch_apei_enable_cmcff(hest_hdr, data);
> + if (!acpi_disable_cmcff)
Why do not you define the flag above in this file (move it out of x86 -
that's what I was aiming at in my previous reply) and remove this ifdeffery
altogether (First firmware handling could apply to arm64 too according to
specs and ACPI on arm64 guidelines) ?
arch_apei_enable_cmcff() is a weak function that does nothing on arm64
and if we need to add an implementation we can do it later.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
> + return !arch_apei_enable_cmcff(hest_hdr, data);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int __init hest_ia_init(void)
> +{
> + return apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL);
> +}
> +#else
> +static inline int __init hest_ia_init(void) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> struct ghes_arr {
> struct platform_device **ghes_devs;
> unsigned int count;
> @@ -232,8 +244,9 @@ void __init acpi_hest_init(void)
> goto err;
> }
>
> - if (!acpi_disable_cmcff)
> - apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_cmc, NULL);
> + rc = hest_ia_init();
> + if (rc)
> + goto err;
>
> if (!ghes_disable) {
> rc = apei_hest_parse(hest_parse_ghes_count, &ghes_count);
> --
> 2.5.0
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-12-08 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-08 7:03 [PATCH v4] acpi, apei, arm64: APEI initial support for aarch64 fu.wei
2015-12-08 7:03 ` fu.wei at linaro.org
2015-12-08 11:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-12-08 11:26 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-12-08 12:45 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-08 12:45 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-08 12:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2015-12-08 12:34 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-12-08 12:52 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-12-08 12:52 ` Hanjun Guo
2015-12-08 13:08 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-08 13:08 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-08 14:07 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-12-08 14:07 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2015-12-09 3:25 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-09 3:25 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-10 2:02 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-10 2:02 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-10 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-10 11:01 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-14 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 11:20 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-14 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-14 11:46 ` Will Deacon
2015-12-14 12:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 12:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 12:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-08 15:53 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-08 15:53 ` Suzuki K. Poulose
2015-12-09 3:00 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-09 3:00 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-09 3:00 ` Fu Wei
2015-12-14 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-12-14 10:46 ` Borislav Petkov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151208123433.GB404@red-moon \
--to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=Marc.Zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=al.stone@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=fu.wei@linaro.org \
--cc=graeme.gregory@linaro.org \
--cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
--cc=hanjun.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=harba@qti.qualcomm.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jcm@redhat.com \
--cc=jon.zhixiong.zhang@gmail.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linaro-acpi@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=msalter@redhat.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rrichter@cavium.com \
--cc=rruigrok@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tn@semihalf.com \
--cc=tomasz.nowicki@linaro.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.