All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:10:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151210071022.GA31969@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151210070635.GC31922@1wt.eu>

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:06:35AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Kees,
> 
> Why not add a new file flag instead ?
> 
> Something like this (editing your patch by hand to illustrate) :
(...)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 3aa514254161..409bd7047e7e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -913,3 +913,4 @@
>  #define FL_OFDLCK       1024    /* lock is "owned" by struct file */
>  #define FL_LAYOUT       2048    /* outstanding pNFS layout */
> +#define FL_DROP_PRIVS   4096    /* lest something weird decides that 2 is OK */

Crap, these ones are for locks, we need to use O_* instead
But anyway you get the idea, I mean there are probably many spare bits
overthere.

Another option I was thinking about was to change f_mode and detect the
change on close. But I don't know what to compare it against.

Willy

--
To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
the body to majordomo@kvack.org.  For more info on Linux MM,
see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, yalin wang <yalin.wang2010@gmail.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:10:22 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151210071022.GA31969@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151210070635.GC31922@1wt.eu>

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 08:06:35AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Kees,
> 
> Why not add a new file flag instead ?
> 
> Something like this (editing your patch by hand to illustrate) :
(...)
> diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
> index 3aa514254161..409bd7047e7e 100644
> --- a/include/linux/fs.h
> +++ b/include/linux/fs.h
> @@ -913,3 +913,4 @@
>  #define FL_OFDLCK       1024    /* lock is "owned" by struct file */
>  #define FL_LAYOUT       2048    /* outstanding pNFS layout */
> +#define FL_DROP_PRIVS   4096    /* lest something weird decides that 2 is OK */

Crap, these ones are for locks, we need to use O_* instead
But anyway you get the idea, I mean there are probably many spare bits
overthere.

Another option I was thinking about was to change f_mode and detect the
change on close. But I don't know what to compare it against.

Willy


  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-10  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-09 22:51 [PATCH v5] fs: clear file privilege bits when mmap writing Kees Cook
2015-12-09 22:51 ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10  1:21 ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-10  1:21   ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-12-10  3:25   ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10  3:25     ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10  4:14 ` Al Viro
2015-12-10  4:14   ` Al Viro
2015-12-10  7:06 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-12-10  7:06   ` Willy Tarreau
2015-12-10  7:10   ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2015-12-10  7:10     ` Willy Tarreau
2015-12-10 18:05   ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 18:05     ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 18:16     ` Willy Tarreau
2015-12-10 18:16       ` Willy Tarreau
2015-12-10 18:18       ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 18:18         ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 19:33       ` Al Viro
2015-12-10 19:33         ` Al Viro
2015-12-10 19:47         ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 19:47           ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 20:27           ` Al Viro
2015-12-10 20:27             ` Al Viro
2015-12-10 21:45             ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 21:45               ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 21:56               ` Al Viro
2015-12-10 21:56                 ` Al Viro
2015-12-10 22:00                 ` Kees Cook
2015-12-10 22:00                   ` Kees Cook
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-12-10 22:33 Kees Cook
2016-01-07 19:36 ` Kees Cook
2016-01-08  0:30 ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151210071022.GA31969@1wt.eu \
    --to=w@1wt.eu \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=yalin.wang2010@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.