All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>,
	linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>,
	Delio Brignoli <dbrignoli@audioscience.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Rosenberger <ilu@linutronix.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:18:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151222221847.GH2793@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151222205604.GA14912@quark.deferred.io>

* Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> [151222 12:56]:
> On 12/22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [151222 12:28]:
> > > On 12/22/2015 05:27 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > >On dm814x we have 13 ADPLLs with 3 to 4 outputs on each. The
> > > >ADPLLs have several dividers and muxes controlled by a shared
> > > >control register for each PLL.
> > > >
> > > >Note that for the clocks to work as device drivers for booting on
> > > >dm814x, this patch depends on "ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall
> > > >levels to postcore_initcall".
> > > >
> > > >Also note that this patch does not implement clk_set_rate for the
> > > >PLL, that will be posted later on when available.
> > > >
> > > >Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> > > >Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > >Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > >Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > >---
> > > >
> > > >If no more comments, Tero can you please apply into an immutable
> > > >branch against v4.4-rc1 that I can merge in too?
> > > >
> > > >Changes since v3:
> > > >
> > > >- We want to create the clkdev entry for all clocks, not just outputs
> > > >- ti_adpll_wait_lock loops did not do the right thing
> > > >- We want to use CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in ti_adpll_init_dco
> > > 
> > > I have just one comment below still, once that is addressed:
> > > 
> > > Conditionally-acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > Stephen / Michael, can you pick this up for next merge? I don't have
> > > anything else coming for the window this time, and I am probably going to be
> > > on vacation just nicely to not be able to push anything anyway.
> > 
> > Also, I managed to remove the dependency to the dts changes. So there's
> > no longer any need to set up an immutable branch for this patch.
> 
> Can you split the binding description into a separate patch and send it
> to the dt mailing list? Feel free to add my Ack to it.

OK will do thanks.

> Stephen and I are trying to not take that stuff anymore.

Sure, no problem.

Regards,

Tony

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 14:18:48 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151222221847.GH2793@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151222205604.GA14912@quark.deferred.io>

* Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com> [151222 12:56]:
> On 12/22, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com> [151222 12:28]:
> > > On 12/22/2015 05:27 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > >On dm814x we have 13 ADPLLs with 3 to 4 outputs on each. The
> > > >ADPLLs have several dividers and muxes controlled by a shared
> > > >control register for each PLL.
> > > >
> > > >Note that for the clocks to work as device drivers for booting on
> > > >dm814x, this patch depends on "ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall
> > > >levels to postcore_initcall".
> > > >
> > > >Also note that this patch does not implement clk_set_rate for the
> > > >PLL, that will be posted later on when available.
> > > >
> > > >Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> > > >Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> > > >Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > >Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> > > >---
> > > >
> > > >If no more comments, Tero can you please apply into an immutable
> > > >branch against v4.4-rc1 that I can merge in too?
> > > >
> > > >Changes since v3:
> > > >
> > > >- We want to create the clkdev entry for all clocks, not just outputs
> > > >- ti_adpll_wait_lock loops did not do the right thing
> > > >- We want to use CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in ti_adpll_init_dco
> > > 
> > > I have just one comment below still, once that is addressed:
> > > 
> > > Conditionally-acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> > > 
> > > Stephen / Michael, can you pick this up for next merge? I don't have
> > > anything else coming for the window this time, and I am probably going to be
> > > on vacation just nicely to not be able to push anything anyway.
> > 
> > Also, I managed to remove the dependency to the dts changes. So there's
> > no longer any need to set up an immutable branch for this patch.
> 
> Can you split the binding description into a separate patch and send it
> to the dt mailing list? Feel free to add my Ack to it.

OK will do thanks.

> Stephen and I are trying to not take that stuff anymore.

Sure, no problem.

Regards,

Tony

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 22:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 15:27 [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:30 ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-22 20:30   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-22 20:30   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-22 20:32   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:32     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:56     ` Michael Turquette
2015-12-22 20:56       ` Michael Turquette
2015-12-22 22:18       ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2015-12-22 22:18         ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151222221847.GH2793@atomide.com \
    --to=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=b.hutchman@gmail.com \
    --cc=dbrignoli@audioscience.com \
    --cc=ilu@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthijsvanduin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.