All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>,
	Delio Brignoli <dbrignoli@audioscience.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Rosenberger <ilu@linutronix.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:30:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5679B2D6.4050102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450798030-23680-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com>

On 12/22/2015 05:27 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On dm814x we have 13 ADPLLs with 3 to 4 outputs on each. The
> ADPLLs have several dividers and muxes controlled by a shared
> control register for each PLL.
>
> Note that for the clocks to work as device drivers for booting on
> dm814x, this patch depends on "ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall
> levels to postcore_initcall".
>
> Also note that this patch does not implement clk_set_rate for the
> PLL, that will be posted later on when available.
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>
> If no more comments, Tero can you please apply into an immutable
> branch against v4.4-rc1 that I can merge in too?
>
> Changes since v3:
>
> - We want to create the clkdev entry for all clocks, not just outputs
> - ti_adpll_wait_lock loops did not do the right thing
> - We want to use CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in ti_adpll_init_dco

I have just one comment below still, once that is addressed:

Conditionally-acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

Stephen / Michael, can you pick this up for next merge? I don't have 
anything else coming for the window this time, and I am probably going 
to be on vacation just nicely to not be able to push anything anyway.

<snip>

> +
> +/* Warn if clkout or clkoutx2 try to set unavailable parent */
> +static int ti_adpll_clkout_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> +	struct ti_adpll_clkout_data *co = to_clkout(hw);
> +	struct ti_adpll_data *d = co->adpll;
> +
> +	if (ti_adpll_clock_is_bypass(d) != index)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +

I think this part is still somewhat weird. You are not doing anything 
useful in this function, so do you need to implement it at all? Just 
returning -EINVAL always might work also. EAGAIN is wrong return value 
anyway as it can pretty much never succeed.

-Tero

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

<snip>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Cc: linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	Brian Hutchinson <b.hutchman@gmail.com>,
	Delio Brignoli <dbrignoli@audioscience.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@baylibre.com>,
	Matthijs van Duin <matthijsvanduin@gmail.com>,
	Philipp Rosenberger <ilu@linutronix.de>,
	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:30:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5679B2D6.4050102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450798030-23680-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com>

On 12/22/2015 05:27 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On dm814x we have 13 ADPLLs with 3 to 4 outputs on each. The
> ADPLLs have several dividers and muxes controlled by a shared
> control register for each PLL.
>
> Note that for the clocks to work as device drivers for booting on
> dm814x, this patch depends on "ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall
> levels to postcore_initcall".
>
> Also note that this patch does not implement clk_set_rate for the
> PLL, that will be posted later on when available.
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>
> If no more comments, Tero can you please apply into an immutable
> branch against v4.4-rc1 that I can merge in too?
>
> Changes since v3:
>
> - We want to create the clkdev entry for all clocks, not just outputs
> - ti_adpll_wait_lock loops did not do the right thing
> - We want to use CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in ti_adpll_init_dco

I have just one comment below still, once that is addressed:

Conditionally-acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

Stephen / Michael, can you pick this up for next merge? I don't have 
anything else coming for the window this time, and I am probably going 
to be on vacation just nicely to not be able to push anything anyway.

<snip>

> +
> +/* Warn if clkout or clkoutx2 try to set unavailable parent */
> +static int ti_adpll_clkout_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> +	struct ti_adpll_clkout_data *co = to_clkout(hw);
> +	struct ti_adpll_data *d = co->adpll;
> +
> +	if (ti_adpll_clock_is_bypass(d) != index)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +

I think this part is still somewhat weird. You are not doing anything 
useful in this function, so do you need to implement it at all? Just 
returning -EINVAL always might work also. EAGAIN is wrong return value 
anyway as it can pretty much never succeed.

-Tero

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

<snip>


WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: t-kristo@ti.com (Tero Kristo)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2015 22:30:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5679B2D6.4050102@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1450798030-23680-1-git-send-email-tony@atomide.com>

On 12/22/2015 05:27 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> On dm814x we have 13 ADPLLs with 3 to 4 outputs on each. The
> ADPLLs have several dividers and muxes controlled by a shared
> control register for each PLL.
>
> Note that for the clocks to work as device drivers for booting on
> dm814x, this patch depends on "ARM: OMAP2+: Change core_initcall
> levels to postcore_initcall".
>
> Also note that this patch does not implement clk_set_rate for the
> PLL, that will be posted later on when available.
>
> Cc: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>
> Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> ---
>
> If no more comments, Tero can you please apply into an immutable
> branch against v4.4-rc1 that I can merge in too?
>
> Changes since v3:
>
> - We want to create the clkdev entry for all clocks, not just outputs
> - ti_adpll_wait_lock loops did not do the right thing
> - We want to use CLK_GET_RATE_NOCACHE in ti_adpll_init_dco

I have just one comment below still, once that is addressed:

Conditionally-acked-by: Tero Kristo <t-kristo@ti.com>

Stephen / Michael, can you pick this up for next merge? I don't have 
anything else coming for the window this time, and I am probably going 
to be on vacation just nicely to not be able to push anything anyway.

<snip>

> +
> +/* Warn if clkout or clkoutx2 try to set unavailable parent */
> +static int ti_adpll_clkout_set_parent(struct clk_hw *hw, u8 index)
> +{
> +	struct ti_adpll_clkout_data *co = to_clkout(hw);
> +	struct ti_adpll_data *d = co->adpll;
> +
> +	if (ti_adpll_clock_is_bypass(d) != index)
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +

I think this part is still somewhat weird. You are not doing anything 
useful in this function, so do you need to implement it at all? Just 
returning -EINVAL always might work also. EAGAIN is wrong return value 
anyway as it can pretty much never succeed.

-Tero

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +

<snip>

  reply	other threads:[~2015-12-22 20:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-12-22 15:27 [PATCH v4] clk: ti: Add support for dm814x ADPLL Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 15:27 ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:30 ` Tero Kristo [this message]
2015-12-22 20:30   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-22 20:30   ` Tero Kristo
2015-12-22 20:32   ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:32     ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 20:56     ` Michael Turquette
2015-12-22 20:56       ` Michael Turquette
2015-12-22 22:18       ` Tony Lindgren
2015-12-22 22:18         ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5679B2D6.4050102@ti.com \
    --to=t-kristo@ti.com \
    --cc=b.hutchman@gmail.com \
    --cc=dbrignoli@audioscience.com \
    --cc=ilu@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-clk@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=matthijsvanduin@gmail.com \
    --cc=mturquette@baylibre.com \
    --cc=narmstrong@baylibre.com \
    --cc=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.