All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>
To: Shannon Zhao <zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>
Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	will.deacon@arm.com, wei@redhat.com, cov@codeaurora.org,
	shannon.zhao@linaro.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com,
	hangaohuai@huawei.com, Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new vcpu device control group for PMUv3
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:52:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208125247.GG620@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454656456-11640-22-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:14:16PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> 
> To configure the virtual PMUv3 overflow interrupt number, we use the
> vcpu kvm_device ioctl, encapsulating the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
> attribute within the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL group.
> 
> After configuring the PMUv3, call the vcpu ioctl with attribute
> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT to initialize the PMUv3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt |  24 ++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h            |  15 ++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c                         |   3 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |   6 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h          |   5 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c                     |  51 ++++++++++++
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h                      |  23 ++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c                         | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 255 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> index 3cc59c5..d626237 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> @@ -6,3 +6,27 @@ KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, and KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR. The interface uses the same struct
>  kvm_device_attr as other devices, but targets VCPU-wide settings and controls.
>  
>  The groups and attributes per virtual cpu, if any, are architecture specific.
> +
> +1. GROUP: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL
> +Architectures: ARM64
> +
> +1.1. ATTRIBUTE: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
> +Parameters: in kvm_device_attr.addr the address for PMU overflow interrupt

so kvm_device_attr.addr is a pointer to an unsigned long or an int, or?

> +Returns: -EBUSY: The PMU overflow interrupt is already set
> +         -ENXIO: The overflow interrupt not set when attempting to get it
> +         -ENODEV: PMUv3 not supported
> +         -EINVAL: Invalid PMU overflow interrupt number supplied
> +
> +A value describing the PMUv3 (Performance Monitor Unit v3) overflow interrupt
> +number for this vcpu. This interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but the interrupt
> +type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI, the interrupt number is same for all

nit: s/is same/is the same/

> +vcpus, while as an SPI it must be different for each vcpu.

nit: s/it must be different for each vcpu/
       it must be a separate number per vcpu/

> +
> +1.2 ATTRIBUTE: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT
> +Parameters: no additional parameter in kvm_device_attr.addr
> +Returns: -ENODEV: PMUv3 not supported
> +         -ENXIO: PMUv3 not properly configured as required prior to calling this
> +                 attribute
> +         -EBUSY: PMUv3 already initialized
> +
> +Request the initialization of the PMUv3.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f9f2779..6dd0992 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -242,5 +242,20 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 34d7395..dc8644f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -846,6 +847,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -859,6 +861,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index cb220b7..a855a30 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -359,5 +359,11 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 6aedbe3..f209ea1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>  #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL	4
>  #define   KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT	0
>  
> +/* Device Control API on vcpu fd */
> +#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL	0
> +#define   KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ	0
> +#define   KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT	1
> +
>  /* KVM_IRQ_LINE irq field index values */
>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT		24
>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK		0xff
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index fcb7788..dbe45c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -380,3 +380,54 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 5f86e1d..f09abf6 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v)		((v)->arch.pmu.ready)
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(v)	((v)->arch.pmu.irq_num >= VGIC_NR_SGIS)
>  u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val);
>  u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -52,11 +53,18 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
>  				    u64 select_idx);
>  bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  #else
>  struct kvm_pmu {
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v)		(false)
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(v)	(false)
>  static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  					    u64 select_idx)
>  {
> @@ -79,6 +87,21 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  						  u64 data, u64 select_idx) {}
>  static inline bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) { return false; }
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 2467d62..06b7cb3 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kvm.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> @@ -393,3 +394,130 @@ bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void)
>  	 */
>  	return (perf_num_counters() > 0);
>  }
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features) ||
> +	    !kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> +	vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				  struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> +				  int *irq, bool is_set)
> +{
> +	if (!is_set) {
> +		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			return -ENXIO;
> +
> +		*irq = vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num;
> +	} else {
> +		if (kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +
> +		kvm_debug("Set kvm ARM PMU irq: %d\n", *irq);
> +		vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num = *irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

are you going to be reusing this function in later patches?  If not, I
don't see the benefit of having this indirection over simply including
it directly in the callers below.

> +
> +static bool irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool is_ppi)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (is_ppi) {
> +			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num != irq)
> +				return false;
> +		} else {
> +			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num == irq)
> +				return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
> +		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +		int reg;
> +
> +		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The PMU overflow interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but for one
> +		 * VM the interrupt type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI,
> +		 * the interrupt number is same for all vcpus, while as an SPI
> +		 * it must be different for each vcpu.
> +		 */
> +		if (reg < VGIC_NR_SGIS || reg >= vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs ||
> +		    !irq_is_valid(vcpu->kvm, reg, reg < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		return kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(vcpu, attr, &reg, true);
> +	}
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> +		return kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(vcpu);
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
> +		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +		int reg = -1;
> +
> +		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(vcpu, attr, &reg, false);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		return put_user(reg, uaddr);
> +	}
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ:
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> +		if (kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() &&
> +		    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.0.4
> 
> 

Besides the style and wording comments:

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: christoffer.dall@linaro.org (Christoffer Dall)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v11 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new vcpu device control group for PMUv3
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:52:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160208125247.GG620@cbox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1454656456-11640-22-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com>

On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 03:14:16PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> From: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> 
> To configure the virtual PMUv3 overflow interrupt number, we use the
> vcpu kvm_device ioctl, encapsulating the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
> attribute within the KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL group.
> 
> After configuring the PMUv3, call the vcpu ioctl with attribute
> KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT to initialize the PMUv3.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao <shannon.zhao@linaro.org>
> Acked-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>
> ---
> CC: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt |  24 ++++++
>  arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h            |  15 ++++
>  arch/arm/kvm/arm.c                         |   3 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h          |   6 ++
>  arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h          |   5 ++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c                     |  51 ++++++++++++
>  include/kvm/arm_pmu.h                      |  23 ++++++
>  virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c                         | 128 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  8 files changed, 255 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> index 3cc59c5..d626237 100644
> --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/devices/vcpu.txt
> @@ -6,3 +6,27 @@ KVM_GET_DEVICE_ATTR, and KVM_HAS_DEVICE_ATTR. The interface uses the same struct
>  kvm_device_attr as other devices, but targets VCPU-wide settings and controls.
>  
>  The groups and attributes per virtual cpu, if any, are architecture specific.
> +
> +1. GROUP: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL
> +Architectures: ARM64
> +
> +1.1. ATTRIBUTE: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ
> +Parameters: in kvm_device_attr.addr the address for PMU overflow interrupt

so kvm_device_attr.addr is a pointer to an unsigned long or an int, or?

> +Returns: -EBUSY: The PMU overflow interrupt is already set
> +         -ENXIO: The overflow interrupt not set when attempting to get it
> +         -ENODEV: PMUv3 not supported
> +         -EINVAL: Invalid PMU overflow interrupt number supplied
> +
> +A value describing the PMUv3 (Performance Monitor Unit v3) overflow interrupt
> +number for this vcpu. This interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but the interrupt
> +type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI, the interrupt number is same for all

nit: s/is same/is the same/

> +vcpus, while as an SPI it must be different for each vcpu.

nit: s/it must be different for each vcpu/
       it must be a separate number per vcpu/

> +
> +1.2 ATTRIBUTE: KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT
> +Parameters: no additional parameter in kvm_device_attr.addr
> +Returns: -ENODEV: PMUv3 not supported
> +         -ENXIO: PMUv3 not properly configured as required prior to calling this
> +                 attribute
> +         -EBUSY: PMUv3 already initialized
> +
> +Request the initialization of the PMUv3.
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index f9f2779..6dd0992 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -242,5 +242,20 @@ static inline void kvm_arm_init_debug(void) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
>  static inline void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) {}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					     struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> index 34d7395..dc8644f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -833,6 +833,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -846,6 +847,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> @@ -859,6 +861,7 @@ static int kvm_arm_vcpu_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  
>  	switch (attr->group) {
>  	default:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(vcpu, attr);
>  		break;
>  	}
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index cb220b7..a855a30 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -359,5 +359,11 @@ void kvm_arm_init_debug(void);
>  void kvm_arm_setup_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_clear_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
>  void kvm_arm_reset_debug_ptr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_HOST_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> index 6aedbe3..f209ea1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/kvm.h
> @@ -205,6 +205,11 @@ struct kvm_arch_memory_slot {
>  #define KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_GRP_CTRL	4
>  #define   KVM_DEV_ARM_VGIC_CTRL_INIT	0
>  
> +/* Device Control API on vcpu fd */
> +#define KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL	0
> +#define   KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ	0
> +#define   KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT	1
> +
>  /* KVM_IRQ_LINE irq field index values */
>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_SHIFT		24
>  #define KVM_ARM_IRQ_TYPE_MASK		0xff
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> index fcb7788..dbe45c3 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
> @@ -380,3 +380,54 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  	}
>  	return 0;
>  }
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_vcpu_arch_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			       struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->group) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_CTRL:
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(vcpu, attr);
> +		break;
> +	default:
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> index 5f86e1d..f09abf6 100644
> --- a/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> +++ b/include/kvm/arm_pmu.h
> @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ struct kvm_pmu {
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v)		((v)->arch.pmu.ready)
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(v)	((v)->arch.pmu.irq_num >= VGIC_NR_SGIS)
>  u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 select_idx, u64 val);
>  u64 kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
> @@ -52,11 +53,18 @@ void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val);
>  void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 data,
>  				    u64 select_idx);
>  bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +			    struct kvm_device_attr *attr);
>  #else
>  struct kvm_pmu {
>  };
>  
>  #define kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(v)		(false)
> +#define kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(v)	(false)
>  static inline u64 kvm_pmu_get_counter_value(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  					    u64 select_idx)
>  {
> @@ -79,6 +87,21 @@ static inline void kvm_pmu_handle_pmcr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 val) {}
>  static inline void kvm_pmu_set_counter_event_type(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>  						  u64 data, u64 select_idx) {}
>  static inline bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void) { return false; }
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +static inline int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +					  struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
>  #endif
>  
>  #endif
> diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> index 2467d62..06b7cb3 100644
> --- a/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> +++ b/virt/kvm/arm/pmu.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>  #include <linux/kvm.h>
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  #include <linux/perf_event.h>
> +#include <linux/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_pmu.h>
>  #include <kvm/arm_vgic.h>
> @@ -393,3 +394,130 @@ bool kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3(void)
>  	 */
>  	return (perf_num_counters() > 0);
>  }
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	if (!kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3())
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features) ||
> +	    !kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
> +	if (kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu))
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +
> +	kvm_pmu_vcpu_reset(vcpu);
> +	vcpu->arch.pmu.ready = true;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +				  struct kvm_device_attr *attr,
> +				  int *irq, bool is_set)
> +{
> +	if (!is_set) {
> +		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			return -ENXIO;
> +
> +		*irq = vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num;
> +	} else {
> +		if (kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			return -EBUSY;
> +
> +		kvm_debug("Set kvm ARM PMU irq: %d\n", *irq);
> +		vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num = *irq;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}

are you going to be reusing this function in later patches?  If not, I
don't see the benefit of having this indirection over simply including
it directly in the callers below.

> +
> +static bool irq_is_valid(struct kvm *kvm, int irq, bool is_ppi)
> +{
> +	int i;
> +	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
> +
> +	kvm_for_each_vcpu(i, vcpu, kvm) {
> +		if (!kvm_arm_pmu_irq_initialized(vcpu))
> +			continue;
> +
> +		if (is_ppi) {
> +			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num != irq)
> +				return false;
> +		} else {
> +			if (vcpu->arch.pmu.irq_num == irq)
> +				return false;
> +		}
> +	}
> +
> +	return true;
> +}
> +
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_set_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
> +		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +		int reg;
> +
> +		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		if (get_user(reg, uaddr))
> +			return -EFAULT;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The PMU overflow interrupt could be a PPI or SPI, but for one
> +		 * VM the interrupt type must be same for each vcpu. As a PPI,
> +		 * the interrupt number is same for all vcpus, while as an SPI
> +		 * it must be different for each vcpu.
> +		 */
> +		if (reg < VGIC_NR_SGIS || reg >= vcpu->kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs ||
> +		    !irq_is_valid(vcpu->kvm, reg, reg < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS))
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +
> +		return kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(vcpu, attr, &reg, true);
> +	}
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> +		return kvm_arm_pmu_v3_init(vcpu);
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_get_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ: {
> +		int __user *uaddr = (int __user *)(long)attr->addr;
> +		int reg = -1;
> +
> +		if (!test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return -ENODEV;
> +
> +		ret = kvm_arm_pmu_irq_access(vcpu, attr, &reg, false);
> +		if (ret)
> +			return ret;
> +		return put_user(reg, uaddr);
> +	}
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> +
> +int kvm_arm_pmu_v3_has_attr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_device_attr *attr)
> +{
> +	switch (attr->attr) {
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_IRQ:
> +	case KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3_INIT:
> +		if (kvm_arm_support_pmu_v3() &&
> +		    test_bit(KVM_ARM_VCPU_PMU_V3, vcpu->arch.features))
> +			return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -ENXIO;
> +}
> -- 
> 2.0.4
> 
> 

Besides the style and wording comments:

Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@linaro.org>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-08 12:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-05  7:13 [PATCH v11 00/21] KVM: ARM64: Add guest PMU support Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13 ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13 ` [PATCH v11 01/21] ARM64: Move PMU register related defines to asm/pmu.h Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13 ` [PATCH v11 02/21] KVM: ARM64: Define PMU data structure for each vcpu Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13 ` [PATCH v11 03/21] KVM: ARM64: Add offset defines for PMU registers Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13 ` [PATCH v11 04/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMCR register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:13   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 05/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMSELR register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 06/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMCEID0 and PMCEID1 register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-08 12:09   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 12:09     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-20 13:15     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-20 13:15       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-20 13:30       ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-20 13:30         ` Peter Maydell
2016-02-20 13:34         ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-20 13:34           ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 07/21] KVM: ARM64: PMU: Add perf event map and introduce perf event creating function Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 08/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for event type register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 09/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for event counter register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 10/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMCNTENSET and PMCNTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 12/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMOVSSET and PMOVSCLR register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 13/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMSWINC register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 14/21] KVM: ARM64: Add helper to handle PMCR register bits Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 15/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMUSERENR register Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 16/21] KVM: ARM64: Add PMU overflow interrupt routing Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-08 12:26   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 12:26     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-20 13:32     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-20 13:32       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-22  7:35     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-22  7:35       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 17/21] KVM: ARM64: Reset PMU state when resetting vcpu Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 18/21] KVM: ARM64: Free perf event of PMU when destroying vcpu Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 19/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new feature bit for PMUv3 Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-08 12:29   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 12:29     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-22  7:43     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-22  7:43       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 20/21] KVM: ARM: Introduce per-vcpu kvm device controls Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-08 12:40   ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-08 12:40     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-20 13:38     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-20 13:38       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14 ` [PATCH v11 21/21] KVM: ARM64: Add a new vcpu device control group for PMUv3 Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-05  7:14   ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-08 12:52   ` Christoffer Dall [this message]
2016-02-08 12:52     ` Christoffer Dall
2016-02-22  7:45     ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-22  7:45       ` Shannon Zhao
2016-02-22  7:45       ` Shannon Zhao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160208125247.GG620@cbox \
    --to=christoffer.dall@linaro.org \
    --cc=cov@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hangaohuai@huawei.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
    --cc=peter.huangpeng@huawei.com \
    --cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
    --cc=shannon.zhao@linaro.org \
    --cc=wei@redhat.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=zhaoshenglong@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.